Why XPS Only Analyze Core Electrons -  X-rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy

Why XPS Only Analyze Core Electrons - X-rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy

XPS Analysis: Understanding Core Electrons

Core vs. Valence Electrons in XPS

  • In X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), the focus is on core electrons rather than valence electrons, as the peaks observed in the spectrum originate from these core electrons.
  • A comparison between oxygen and titanium dioxide (Titania) illustrates that larger atoms like Titania have higher binding energies for their core electrons, resulting in distinct peak positions in the spectrum.

Elemental Analysis through Binding Energy

  • The presence of peaks at lower binding energy indicates smaller atoms such as oxygen, while higher binding energy peaks suggest larger atoms like Titania.
  • Core electrons are less influenced by surrounding atoms compared to valence electrons, leading to minimal shifts (0 to 10 eV), termed chemical shifts.

Importance of Binding Energy

  • Valence electron binding energies exhibit significant variation due to bonding interactions, making them less reliable for elemental composition analysis compared to core electron binding energies.
  • Core electron peaks are crucial for accurate elemental analysis in XPS; they include first S, 2S, and 2P levels.

Cross-section and Ionization Probability

  • The term "cross-section" refers to the probability of photoionization; core electrons have a higher cross-section due to stronger nuclear attraction compared to loosely bound valence electrons.
  • The use of aluminum and magnesium x-ray sources in XPS targets core electron emissions effectively since their binding energies range significantly higher than those of valence electrons.

Techniques for Electron Emission Analysis

  • Ultraviolet Photoelectron Spectroscopy (UPS) is used for analyzing valence electrons due to its lower penetration power compared to x-rays used in XPS.
  • When x-rays interact with a sample, they emit both core and valence electrons; however, only core electron peaks appear sharp and distinct while valence electron signals are often weak and difficult to observe.

Comparative Binding Energies

  • An example comparing oxygen and Titania shows that Titania's greater number of protons leads to higher attractive forces on its core electrons, resulting in increased binding energy.
  • This difference means that when x-rays excite these elements, Titania will show peaks at higher binding energies than oxygen due to its larger atomic structure.

Understanding Core Electrons and Their Binding Energy

The Nature of Core Electrons

  • Core electrons are tightly bound to the nucleus, resulting in greater binding energy. This strong binding means they are less influenced by external factors compared to valence electrons.

Influence of Neighboring Atoms

  • The binding energy of core electrons can shift due to perturbations from neighboring atoms or orbitals, with a range of 0 to 10 electron volts. This shift is symmetric for insulators but asymmetric for conductors, indicating more variation in conductors.

Binding Energy Range

  • The binding energy for elements typically falls around 1100 electron volts, which is sufficient for core electrons but not for valence electrons. This alignment increases the probability and cross-section for photoionization events involving core electrons.

Comparison Between Core and Valence Electrons

  • Core level electrons are less affected by their environment than valence electrons, which participate in bonding with neighboring atoms. Valence electrons have lower binding energy and are more susceptible to environmental influences.

Challenges in Extracting Information from Valence Electrons

  • Due to their loose binding and constant interaction with surrounding atoms, valence electrons do not provide reliable information about individual atoms. Variations in their environment lead to difficulties in extracting precise elemental data from them.
Video description

Why Core Electrons for XPS analysis? Why not the valence electrons ? If we look into the XPS spectra, there are peaks only from the core electrons like 1s, 2s, etc... NOT from the valence electrons ... Three main reasons: 1. The core electrons are less affected by the environment as compared to the valence electrons and the calculated Binding Energy (BE) of the core electrons is the EXACT calculation to reveal about the elements present in the sample. 2. The x-rays sources energy in XPS are in the range (0 - 1400 eV) and most elements core electrons BE ~1100 eV, so there is a matching of core electron BE and x-rays source energy. It means XPS is design for core- electrons emission. 3. The core-electrons have higher cross section as compared to the valence electrons. Therefore, there is a higher probabilities for x-rays to interact with the core electrons than the valence electrons. Let's discuss in details: First, the core electrons are tightly bound to the nucleus having high BE and mostly influenced by the nucleus and there is a little affect from the nearby orbitals or nearest atoms. But this change in BE is very small from 0 - 10 eV, called chemical shift and the observed BE of these core electrons in XPS provide the exact information for elemental analysis. The BE of these core-electrons are the characteristic of particular element. Whereas valence electrons are affected a lot by the environment. For instance, the valence electrons can make chemical bonds with the nearest atoms and roaming freely so there is a significant variation in the BE and can NOT be used for elemental analysis. Secondly, In XPS, the common x-rays sources are Al Kα ~1486.6 eV and Mg Kα ~1253.6 eV. When these high energy x-rays interact with the sample, the x-rays energy are matching with the core-electron BE and the probability (cross section) of core electron emission is higher. Therefore, XPS is design for core electrons emission because most elements core electron BE ~1100 eV. While for valence electrons, there is lower cross section (less probability for photoionization). Therefore, the XPS peaks from these valence electrons are not clear and distinct and can NOT be used for elemental analysis. Here, for valence electron spectroscopy, ultraviolet photoelectrons spectroscopy (UPS) are widely used. To sum up, on the basis of aforementioned discussion, we have proved that XPS is truly a core electron spectroscopy. In fact, there are peaks from the valence electrons with low intensity relatively to the core electrons peaks. XPS - X-rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy || Surface vs. Ultra thin film vs. Thin film https://youtu.be/3slRII-sJEI Secret Behind "hv = BE+KE+Ø" Equation for X-rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy https://youtu.be/zKbBA-Mdcqg XPS vs XRF vs Auger Effect- X-rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy https://youtu.be/WMSiReWsUCk What is Binding Energy (BE) in X-rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)? https://youtu.be/gImrgl8Mp7k Why XPS is a Surface Sensitive Technique? https://youtu.be/xb3jZ7Z9EoU Why p-orbital, d-orbital, f-orbital have TWO Peaks- Doublet in XPS Spectra https://youtu.be/LL281sSvdDc Importance of Survey Spectra in XPS - X rays Photoelectron Spectroscopy https://youtu.be/t4WJ3_sXbzY