Le passé n’existe pas - La théorie du récentisme - TDM #5

Le passé n’existe pas - La théorie du récentisme - TDM #5

Introduction to the Video and Its Sponsor

Overview of Cooper Application

  • The video is sponsored by Cooper, an application that summarizes books, conferences, documentaries, and podcasts into essential insights within 20 minutes.
  • Links to the application are provided in the description, with a discussion about it planned for later in the video.

Exploring Historical Theories

Concept of Added Imaginary Centuries

  • The video introduces theories suggesting that imaginary centuries may have been added to world chronology.
  • It sets up a premise questioning historical timelines rather than presenting a new Netflix series.

Introduction of Fomenko's Theory

Background on Anatoly Fomenko

  • Discussion begins with archaeologist Clotilde de Chêne Musil and transitions to Anatoly Fomenko, a mathematician and physicist from Moscow University.
  • Fomenko’s interest in astronomy led him to identify inconsistencies between historical sources and astronomical events like eclipses.

Critique of Historical Chronology

Errors in Historical Dating

  • Fomenko proposes that historians might have mistakenly recorded dates; for instance, misreading "300" as "1300."
  • This misinterpretation could imply that significant historical events like the Trojan War were actually medieval crusades.

Methodology Behind Fomenko's Claims

Statistical Approach to History

  • Fomenko employs mathematical and statistical methods to analyze historical sequences.
  • He identifies "event sequences," where empires rise around universal religions before fragmenting into independent kingdoms.

Documentary Sequences Analysis

Documented Evidence Misinterpretation

  • He discusses "documentary sequences," arguing that similar numbers of texts over different periods suggest they may refer to the same timeframe.
  • This leads to claims that if Christ had lived during the Middle Ages, it would explain certain historical conflicts like the Fourth Crusade against Constantinople.

Other Recentist Theorists

Variations in Recentism

  • The video mentions other recentist thinkers such as Yuto Peur and François de Sartre who propose differing theories on history.

Contextual Influences on Russian Historiography

Soviet Influence on Historical Interpretation

  • Fomenko's background in a Soviet bloc context influenced his dismissal of traditional history in favor of mathematical sciences.

Shift from Textual Analysis

Focus on Quantitative Data

  • Russian recentism shifts focus away from textual analysis towards counting occurrences within texts without considering their content or context.

Reimagining History

New Narratives Proposed by Recentists

  • Once official chronology is set aside, new narratives can be constructed; for example, envisioning a grand Orthodox empire influencing all subsequent kingdoms.

Disagreement Between Recentists and Historians

Overview of Recentist Perspectives

  • The recentists humorously suggest that if one wants to spend half an hour laughing, they should look online, but they question the validity of historical sources.
  • They argue that written sources are confusing due to their varied writing styles and languages, leading to assumptions about different historical periods.
  • A key figure in this debate is Scaliger, a 16th-century scholar who emphasized comparing Greek and Roman calendars with Jewish, Egyptian, Babylonian, and Persian chronologies.

Critique of Historical Methodology

  • Recentists claim that archaeology may be more reliable than history; however, they criticize carbon dating as being derived from official history.
  • They allege that historians maintain secrets for personal or professional interests regarding chronological inaccuracies since Scaliger's time.
  • Some recentists assert absurd claims about the Russian Empire extending into Ireland based on linguistic interpretations.

Conspiracy Theories in Historical Interpretation

  • There are suggestions of a supranational conspiracy among elites to keep historical truths hidden for centuries.
  • Historians largely ignore these claims because they seem too far-fetched to warrant serious consideration.

Limitations of Recentist Arguments

  • Notably absent from recentist discussions are trained historians; instead, mathematicians and artists dominate the discourse.
  • Recentists prioritize document dates over context or authorship, undermining the complexity inherent in historical analysis.

Understanding Historical Context

  • Professional historians analyze not just dates but also the language and context behind documents to understand their significance better.
  • The reliability of ancient documents is questioned; just because a document can be dated does not guarantee its truthfulness or accuracy.

Challenges in Historical Research

  • Historians must navigate human fallibility when interpreting documents; even dated records can contain falsehoods or exaggerations.
  • Reliable authorship is determined by consistency across multiple sources rather than isolated texts devoid of context.

Statistical Methods vs. Human Elements in History

  • The reductionist approach taken by recentists overlooks the human aspects crucial to understanding history; statistics cannot capture all nuances.
  • While recentists claim nothing is true historically, this perspective leads to convoluted theories requiring numerous hypotheses for coherence.

Understanding Historical Chronology and Its Critiques

The Complexity of Simplifying History

  • The speaker discusses the challenge of simplifying history, noting that attempts to do so often lead to unnecessary complications. They propose addressing two main accusations from critics regarding historical chronology.

Scientific Methods in Dating History

  • The first accusation is that history lacks scientific methods for validation. The speaker counters this by mentioning carbon-14 dating as a well-known method, which critics claim was created retroactively to support official timelines.
  • Carbon-14 dating is not the only method; it has been calibrated using archaeological objects. Other dating techniques include beryllium-10 for ice cores, tritium for water and wine, dendrochronology for tree ages, and radiocarbon dating for ancient plant seeds.
  • Historians and archaeologists utilize multiple dating methods simultaneously to ensure accuracy. This multi-faceted approach allows them to cross-check measurements, acknowledging that while individual measures may be approximate, they can still yield coherent results.

Historical Re-evaluation Over Time

  • The second major point raised by critics is the assertion that historians never question established chronologies. However, figures like Flavius Josephus (1st century), Tabari (9th century), Scaliger (16th century), and Isaac Newton (18th century) have all challenged chronological frameworks throughout history.
  • Scaliger aimed for objectivity by comparing various chronologies. Modern historians benefit from advanced scientific tools unavailable in earlier times, allowing them to explore beyond what Scaliger could achieve.

Misconceptions About Historical Critique

  • Dismissing Scaliger does not invalidate all chronologists across time; modern historians possess superior tools that enable deeper analysis and sometimes contradict earlier conclusions.
  • The speaker humorously notes how some conspiracy theories surrounding historical critiques can be amusing but warns against taking extreme views too seriously due to their often aggressive nature on forums.

Tools for Learning and Understanding History

  • A linguist named Andrea Lignac speculates whether some critiques are merely academic jokes among researchers about the limitations of science in distinguishing parody from serious theory.
  • Emphasizing the abundance of educational resources available today, the speaker introduces Cooper—a summarization app offering insights into non-fiction content such as books and documentaries—highlighting its utility in learning efficiently.

Engaging with Educational Content

  • Cooper provides concise summaries of essential information from various sources, making it easier for users to learn quickly through reading or listening formats during daily activities like commuting or exercising.
  • Users can explore diverse topics including history and science through Cooper's platform. A special offer provides a 40% discount on subscriptions for early sign-ups—encouraging curiosity-driven learning opportunities.
Video description

Cette vidéo est en partenariat avec Koober, l'outil dont je parlais pour s'instruire et apprendre de nouvelles choses. Pour profitez de l'offre à -40%, cliquez sur ce lien : https://affiliation.onelink.me/aoMW/lesrevuesdumonde ____________ • Tipeee : https://bit.ly/2RFKECb • Instagram : https://bit.ly/3kzpvpK • Twitter : https://bit.ly/3myo3Wt • Facebook : https://bit.ly/3iOlWLE Pour toutes démarches professionnelles ou commerciales : lesrevuesdumonde@gmail.com ■ Pour aller plus loin, quelques liens utiles et sources FOMENKO, PENSEUR “SOVIETIQUE” Andreï Zalizniak, La linguistique selon Fomenko (Lingvistika po A.T.Fomenko), Istorija i antiistorija (Kritika «novoj xronologii» akademika A.T.Fomenko). Moscou, 2000. Mischa Gabowitsch, Fomenko et la “nouvelle chronologie”, 2009. http://www.ilya.it/chrono/frpages/fomenkodebatfr.html James H. Billington, Russia in search of itself. Washington, D.C., Woodrow Wilson Center Press Baltimore–Londres, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2004. https://journals.openedition.org/monderusse/4217 DIVERS Thomas C. Durand, “Le récentisme, une falsification de l’Histoire”, in La Menace Théoriste. https://menace-theoriste.fr/recentisme-1/ Science Étonnante, Comment mesurer l'âge des choses grâce au Carbone 14 ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3z9AEqSwFU SOURCES RECENTISTES François de Sarre, Où est donc passé le Moyen- ge ? L'invention de l'ère chrétienne. https://notionsdhistoire.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/ou_est_donc_passe_le_moyen-age.pdf Documentaire sur la chronologie de Fomenko : Godland Pictures, L’Histoire : science ou fiction ? (Годлэнд Пикчерз), 2009. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71381T9T0vU&feature=youtu.be&t=11m8s Site du “Mouvement Matricien” https://matricien.wordpress.com/ ■ Écriture Jean de Boisséson, Charlie Danger ■ Montage Bilou, Charlie Danger ■ BO des RDM La grande table productions - • Site officiel : http://grandetableproductions.com • Youtube : https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_fQ... • Soundcloud : https://soundcloud.com/la-grande-table ■ Graphismes et Intro Mr Sley - • Portefolio : www.behance.net/guillaumebasley • Instagram : www.instagram.com/guillaume.basley/ Adem pour la miniature A bientôt pour de nouvelles aventures ! © Les Revues du Monde