0102001625JP082411252 copia defensa

Judicial Proceedings Overview

Introduction to the Hearing

• The session resumes at 10:47 AM, with a report to the presiding judge regarding an urgent communication received from Astrid Guadalupe Galicia Reyes, a specialized prosecutor in crimes against women and related issues. This communication states that expert Luis David Haulina cannot attend physically but can participate virtually due to urgent investigative work in another district.

Notification of Experts

• A second official document is presented from Héctor Ronsón García, detailing notifications sent to various experts (Laura Esmeralda Lucero Precero, María de Jesús Mazabaldes, Francisco Javier García Espinoza, and Luis David Paulila) for their attendance at the current hearing.

Legal Representation Confirmation

• The social representation is confirmed present in court. Martín Rocha González has designated a legal advisor who is also present. The judge allows this advisor to proceed with their individualization as they are currently the only properly identified party involved in the proceedings.

Advisor's Knowledge of Case

• The appointed legal professional confirms awareness of Article 110 of the National Code of Criminal Procedure and acknowledges understanding of the investigation file relevant to this case while accepting their role formally. This acceptance is noted by the judge as valid under Article 54 of the same code.

Verification Process

• The judge verifies that all identification requirements are met according to Article 54 and checks if there’s any uncertainty regarding knowledge about previous hearings or developments in this criminal process before proceeding further with formalities concerning legal representation.

Identification and Documentation

Identification Confirmation

• An identification card issued by the National Electoral Institute is reviewed; it remains valid until 2029 and matches the individual being verified for participation in these proceedings. Additionally, confirmation is made regarding their professional license number associated with a law degree.

Acknowledgment of Previous Hearings

• The appointed advisor indicates they have been briefed on prior hearings by another counsel who attended those sessions, ensuring continuity in understanding case developments without confusion about procedural history or status updates within this trial context.

Legal Representation Dynamics

Continuation of Legal Counsel Designation

• The court seeks clarification on whether the victim continues with their current legal representation or wishes to revoke it; it’s confirmed that they will maintain this designation moving forward into future hearings where both advisors may need to clarify who speaks on behalf during proceedings without overlap in roles.

Official Notifications Recorded

• Two official documents referenced earlier are acknowledged: one confirming notification sent regarding Manuel Sotero Pérez's attendance at court and another detailing procedural compliance observed by judicial authorities during witness management protocols established for maintaining order within courtroom settings throughout these proceedings.

Transcript Summary Legal Proceedings and Testimonies

Overview of the Hearing Process

• The hearing addresses a request for correction regarding an error in the scheduled date for a hearing set for May 15, 2025. The speaker emphasizes that this was an involuntary mistake.

• Licenciado Héctor Ronson García informs the court about a different communication specifying the correct date and time for the proceedings, which is now set for November 24 of the current year.

• A request from fiscal Claudia Gerónimo Mandujano highlights urgent needs related to two separate investigations, indicating that expert Luis David Jaulyla will not be able to attend physically but may participate via videoconference.

Expert Witnesses' Attendance Issues

• The judge acknowledges that if authorized, expert witnesses can attend virtually through videoconferencing, providing their contact details as necessary.

• Notifications were sent to several witnesses regarding their attendance; however, some have indicated they cannot appear in person due to various reasons including health issues.

Communication with Experts

• An official document confirms that expert Luis David Jauhila cannot attend physically and requests permission to join via videoconference instead.

• The presence of other individuals involved in the case is noted, including police officers and additional experts who are present at the hearing.

Health-related Absences of Experts

• It is reported that expert Elizabeth Haulila was unable to inform her absence prior to the hearing due to lack of communication.

• Dr. Laura Esmeralda Lucero Pesero communicated her inability to attend due to an accident resulting in incapacity.

Request for Electronic Participation

• Terecita de Jesús Rivera Mata also reported health issues preventing her attendance but expressed willingness to provide testimony electronically if permitted by the court.

• All three experts have requested electronic participation through their superiors while awaiting confirmation from the court on how they can proceed with their testimonies.

Concerns Regarding Procedural Integrity

• Defense counsel raises concerns about needing documentation verifying health claims made by absent witnesses before accepting their justifications for non-attendance.

• There are significant implications regarding procedural integrity if key witnesses are allowed remote participation without proper verification, potentially affecting future proceedings under national legal standards.

This structured summary captures essential discussions and decisions made during this segment of legal proceedings while linking back directly to specific timestamps for further reference.

Discussion on Medical Inabilities in Court

Context of the Hearing

• The social representation acknowledges the defense's statements but emphasizes that both Dr. Laura Esmeralda Lucero Pécero and Teresita de Jesús Rivera Mata are unable to attend due to medical incapacities.

Details of Medical Conditions

• Teresita de Jesús Rivera Mata has a medical condition affecting her hip, preventing her from standing or sitting for extended periods.

• Dr. Laura Esmeralda Lucero Pécero is recovering from a fall, which also restricts her ability to be present in court.

Request for Remote Participation

• Both individuals can participate remotely; the speaker requests the judge to facilitate this arrangement, noting that their absences have been justified prior to the hearing.

Clarification on Notifications

• The prosecution is asked about notifications received regarding these incapacities, indicating a lack of documentation confirming their conditions.

Examination of Official Communications

• The judge notes that there was no mention of incapacity in official communication 17.069; instead, it indicated obligations for other individuals to appear in court under penalty of fines.

Review of Additional Documentation

• There is uncertainty regarding referenced documents; only one document has been acknowledged by the court assistant at this point.

Confirmation of Incapacities

• Document 17.070 confirms Teresita de Jesús Rivera Mata's incapacity for seven days due to her medical condition as per official records dated November 18, 2025.

Further Updates on Absences

• It is reiterated that Dr. Laura Esmeralda Lucero Pécero is also currently incapacitated due to her recent fall and cannot attend the hearing.

Request for Recess

• A five-minute recess is requested by the prosecution to communicate with legal counsel regarding justifications for non-attendance at this hearing.