Try Seedance 2.0 Before Everyone Else! (This Changes Everything)

Testing a New AI Video Model

Introduction to the AI Video Model

• The speaker introduces a new AI video model that may surpass Cling 3, which recently became the most realistic AI video model available.

• This new model is not officially released yet, but access methods will be shared during the discussion.

Features of Cedance 2 Pro

• Cedance 2 Pro is noted for its cinematic and stunning visuals, with free credits available for users to try it out on a linked website.

• Users can create videos using various methods: text-to-video, image-to-video, first and last frame options, and multi-reference opportunities.

Testing Methodology

• The speaker plans to use a personal prompt involving themes of pride and bravery while testing facial acting and vocal delivery capabilities of the model.

• Initial results show excellent realism in both facial expressions and voice quality compared to other leading models.

Accessing the Model

Current Access Limitations

• The current access point for this model is unofficial; it may experience occasional failures or delays in generation processes.

• Users are assured that any failed generations will be refunded as developers work on improving accessibility.

Multi-Shot Prompting Capabilities

• Demonstration of multi-shot prompting shows how well the model animates sequential frames from uploaded reference images, maintaining narrative coherence across shots.

• Videos generated currently have a resolution of 720p with lengths up to 15 seconds, allowing for consistent visual storytelling through multiple references.

Comparative Analysis with Cling 3

Dynamic Physical Actions

• A key strength of this new model is its handling of dynamic physical actions like gymnastics and striking, showcasing adherence to reality and physics in animations.

• The realism achieved makes it difficult to distinguish between AI-generated content and real-life footage due to improved dynamics in action sequences.

Cinematic Cohesion

• An example highlights beautiful cinematic cohesion within an animated piece that demonstrates unprecedented levels of believability in dynamic actions compared to previous models like Cling 3.

Technical Performance Insights

Interaction with Complex Objects

• Observations reveal improvements in how characters interact with complex objects; there’s less disconnect between character movements and object interactions than seen previously in AI videos.

Advanced Shot Types

• The model excels at various shot types including first-person views during action scenes, enhancing immersion through realistic tracking shots even after explosions occur.

Quality Assessment of Animation

Professional Usability

• Animation quality has reached a level where it can be considered usable in professional settings; this marks a significant milestone for AI-generated content creation tools available today.

Character Creation Improvements

• Enhanced character acting and lip-syncing are noted as major advancements; however, minor critiques suggest variability could improve background character movements further.

Exploring AI in Animation and Advertising

Advancements in Animation Technology

• The emergence of tools like Nachos 2D allows individuals to create entire feature-length anime films independently, showcasing the potential of AI in animation.

• An example from Elcina illustrates advanced martial arts action sequences, integrating fantastical elements such as a character with four arms and a third eye seamlessly into the narrative.

• The latest model of Cedance Pro is noted to be 30% faster than its predecessor, with significant improvements in audio quality.

Opportunities with AI Tools

• Art List is introduced as a platform enabling users to create high-quality advertising campaigns quickly, previously requiring large teams and substantial budgets.

• A comparison highlights that while traditional brands may take months and millions for ad creation, Art List can produce similar results within five days.

Quality of Output

• Attention to detail in character expressions enhances believability, making animations more usable for professional purposes.

• Users do not need advanced technical skills to utilize Art List's AI toolkit; they can start creating professional ads within minutes.

Testing AI Capabilities

• The video tests complex challenges such as handling large character sets at small sizes, revealing impressive performance by the AI despite some room for improvement.

• Facial expressions are examined closely; characters exhibit intense emotions that contribute significantly to realism.

Comparing AI Models: Cedance Pro vs. Cling 3.0

• A side-by-side comparison between Cedance Pro and Cling 3.0 reveals that Cedance Pro excels in text animations without noticeable morphing issues.

• While both models handle UI animations well, Cling 3.0 shows rapid disintegration of text compared to the smoother transitions seen in Cedance Pro.

Action Sequence Comparisons

• A Dragon Ball Z example demonstrates how Cedance Pro maintains dynamic movement and narrative flow better than Cling 3.0, which appears slower and less engaging.

Voice Quality Assessment

• When comparing voice outputs from both models during an emotional scene ("For Spartacus"), Cling 3's voice sounds wooden and artificial compared to the natural quality produced by Cedance Pro.

Censorship Tests on Generated Content

• Initial tests reveal that certain prompts involving celebrity likenesses (e.g., Elon Musk or Taylor Swift images/videos) are rejected by the system due to censorship protocols.

Exploring the Limits of Human Anatomy in Video Creation

Initial Attempts at Video Creation

• The speaker discusses their journey in creating videos that reveal human anatomy, starting with a modest image and progressing to a video of a woman dancing on the beach.

• The initial video creation was accompanied by music, indicating an attempt to enhance the visual experience.

Challenges with Censorship

• The speaker attempted to create more provocative content but faced censorship issues; even non-full frontal nudity was deemed inappropriate and required blurring.

• A model showcasing high levels of realism and cinematic quality was rejected due to its explicit nature, highlighting the tension between artistic expression and societal standards.

• The discussion emphasizes the current limitations imposed by censorship on creative projects involving human anatomy.