المُخبر الاقتصادي+ | صديق الجزائر الذي أغضب الأخوات السبع.. كيف تحطمت طائرته في ظروف غامضة؟

Opening of the Samir Oil Refinery

• On January 10, 1962, King Hassan II of Morocco inaugurated the Samir oil refinery in Mohammedia.

• The event was attended by Italian Prime Minister Amintore Fanfani and his Foreign Minister Antonio Segni.

• Notably absent was Enrico Mattei, a prominent figure invited to the opening.

Enrico Mattei's Last-Minute Cancellation

• Mattei canceled his trip to Morocco at the last minute due to alleged health issues.

• Initial reports from ENI claimed he suffered from a health crisis preventing travel.

• Later media scrutiny suggested that this explanation was not credible.

Investigation into Mattei's Flight Issues

• Just days before the inauguration, on January 6, 1962, tests were conducted on Mattei's private jet.

• Technicians discovered a screwdriver lodged in one of the engines during testing in Rome.

• This sabotage aimed to cause an explosion mid-flight.

Motive Behind Sabotage

• The intention behind placing the screwdriver was likely to kill Mattei during flight.

• He was considered one of Italy's most influential figures at that time.

• His relationships with Arab nations and opposition to American companies made him a target.

Background on Enrico Mattei

• Mattei had contentious relations with major American and British oil companies known as "the Seven Sisters."

• His influence extended beyond politics; he played a key role in Italy’s post-war economic miracle.

• The circumstances surrounding his life and death are critical for understanding his legacy.

Post-War Italy's Energy Crisis

• After WWII, Italy faced severe devastation and energy shortages impacting reconstruction efforts.

• The country relied heavily on imported coal which became economically burdensome due to shipping costs.

• Heavy industries struggled due to high energy costs limiting economic growth opportunities.

Italy’s Struggle for Energy Independence

• Prior to WWII, Italy already faced energy deficiencies primarily relying on coal imports.

• Efforts for domestic oil exploration largely failed despite significant investments.

• In April 1926, ENI (Azienda Generale Italiana Petroli or AGIP), aimed at increasing local oil production.

Government Control Over Oil Resources

• The Italian government hoped AGIP would reduce reliance on foreign imports while boosting national security.

• AGIP struggled with limited success in discovering commercially viable oil reserves post-WWII.

• Continued dependence on foreign energy sources remained a challenge for Italy’s economy.

Financial Constraints Post-War

• By May 1945, financial constraints led the Italian government to reconsider funding AGIP operations.

• A proposal emerged suggesting privatization of profitable drilling sites while closing unproductive ones.

• This marked a pivotal moment questioning AGIP’s future amidst budgetary pressures.

Evaluation of AGIP Operations

• A young businessman named Enrico Mattei evaluated AGIP’s financial status amid potential liquidation discussions.

• Despite lacking direct experience in oil industry management, he possessed strong political connections.

• Initially tasked with assessing viability rather than saving it; he soon recognized its potential value.

Shift in Perspective Towards AGIP

• Upon reviewing company files and visiting drilling sites, Mattei saw untapped potential within AGIP operations.

• He believed that dismissing AGIP would squander valuable resources crucial for national energy independence.

• This realization prompted him to advocate against liquidation plans actively.

Establishment of ENI

• On February 10, 1953, Law No. 136 established ENI as an overarching entity encompassing various state-owned firms including AGIP.

• As its first president, Mattei aimed at transforming ENI into an integrated energy powerhouse controlling all aspects from exploration through distribution.

• His vision sought independence from foreign oil companies dominating global markets.

Challenges Facing ENI

− Matteo realized that not only did Italy lack sufficient domestic oil but also faced competition from major international players known as “the Seven Sisters.”

− These companies controlled approximately 85% of global crude production outside North America and Soviet bloc countries by 1950。

− Their dominance extended across all facets of petroleum industry operations including pricing manipulation detrimental to importing nations like Italy。

Italy's Dependency on Imports

− Despite advancements post-WWII，Italy still needed substantial imports due mainly increased demand during reconstruction efforts。

− This dependency placed them under pressure from “the Seven Sisters” who exploited their market position。

− Matteo criticized their pricing strategies labeling them exploitative towards resource-rich nations reliant upon imported fuels。

Strategic Partnerships Proposal

− To counteract these challenges，Matteo proposed establishing strategic partnerships directly with resource-rich countries like those in Middle East。

− He envisioned negotiating favorable terms allowing extraction rights while ensuring fair profit-sharing arrangements benefiting both parties involved。

− However，most regions were already dominated by existing contracts held by Western corporations complicating negotiations。

Initial Attempts at Negotiation

− Matteo encountered difficulties entering negotiations given late arrival compared competitors possessing greater financial clout。

− His initial attempts met resistance particularly highlighted during events surrounding Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh’s overthrow in 1953。

− The struggle over Iranian oil showcased tensions between Western powers regarding control over resources after regime changes occurred。

Italian Interests Rejected

− When seeking participation within consortium agreements concerning Iranian resources，Italy received outright rejections from dominant players involved。

− This rejection fueled resentment within Matteo leading him towards aggressive stances against Western corporations’ monopolistic practices。

− He later described feeling humiliated when denied entry into lucrative deals previously inaccessible due solely based upon perceived inferiority relative larger entities present。

Open Conflict Against Major Corporations

− Following these setbacks，Matteo initiated open conflict targeting major American/British firms operating globally aiming disrupt existing agreements favoring them exclusively。

− His strategy included direct negotiations bypassing traditional channels attempting secure advantageous positions directly benefiting Italian interests instead。

− The first significant move came through engaging Iran directly offering unprecedented terms favoring local stakeholders significantly altering dynamics previously established among competing interests globally。

Negotiating New Terms with Iran

− In March 1957，ENI negotiated groundbreaking agreement granting Iran majority share profits derived extracted hydrocarbons contrary prevailing norms seen elsewhere regionally thus reshaping expectations moving forward。

− This deal allowed Iran retain up-to75% profits generated whilst providing minimal return back towards ENI itself creating precedent others might follow suit subsequently thereafter too!

− Such arrangements posed threats potentially undermining long-standing practices upheld historically benefitting predominantly western interests throughout entire sector!

International Reactions Following Agreement

− Shortly after signing agreement concerns arose among US/UK officials fearing ripple effects could inspire similar demands across other producing nations worldwide!

− American ambassador James David Zellerbach warned about possible repercussions affecting relationships between international firms & producing states alike!

− British government prepared formal protests objecting breaking established norms threatening stability overall landscape governing hydrocarbon dealings internationally!

( ت＝1270 ｓ ）Significance Beyond Profitability

– ( ت＝＝127０سـ)[تأثير الاتفاق كان أكبر بكثير من مجرد قيمة النفط المستخرج بل شكل اختباراً لنموذج جديد يحقق مصالح الطرفين بشكل متوازن.]

– ( ت＝＝127０سـ)[ماتي أدرك أن الدول المنتجة أصبحت أكثر وعياً بحقوقها وتطلب نصيباً أكبر من ثرواتها، مما دفعه لتقديم صيغة جديدة تعزز الشراكة.]

– ( ت＝＝127０سـ)[هذا النموذج الجديد كان بمثابة فرصة لإعادة تشكيل العلاقات بين الشركات والدول المنتجة بعيداً عن الهيمنة التقليدية.]

【1311】 【تعاون مع دول أخرى】

– ([ت＝＝1311سـ]) بعد نجاح نموذج إيران، بدأ ماتي يسعى لتكرار التجربة مع دول عربية وأفريقية أخرى مثل مصر والجزائر والمغرب، حيث كانت هناك رغبة مشتركة في بناء شراكات استراتيجية تحقق المنفعة للطرفين.【】

– ([ت＝＝1311سـ]) في عاميّ الـ54 و55، بدأت إيني نشاطها في مصر عبر شركة إيني المصرية الإيطالية للنفط، حيث تم اكتشاف حقول نفطية ناجحة.【】

– ([ت＝＝1311سـ]) هذا التعاون لم يكن فقط اقتصادياً بل شمل أيضاً نقل المعرفة والخبرة لبناء صناعة وطنية قوية في مجال النفط.【】

Agreement with Morocco in 1958

• An agreement was signed in Rabat granting a concession for oil exploration in maritime areas.

• The agreement included the establishment of a company and the construction of the Mohammedia refinery, which provided significant benefits to Morocco.

• The refinery allowed Morocco to develop infrastructure for refining oil products locally.

Mattei's Challenges in 1962

• The year 1962 was filled with conflicts and negotiations for Mattei as he sought understanding with American oil companies.

• He prepared for a visit to the U.S. to meet President John F. Kennedy while strengthening ties with North African countries.

• Mattei's dealings with the Soviet Union raised concerns among Americans, causing significant tension.

Mysterious Plane Crash

• On October 27, 1962, Mattei's plane crashed near Pavia, killing all three on board including an American journalist.

• His sudden death raised many questions due to his controversial dealings and numerous enemies.

• Initial investigations found insufficient evidence to classify the crash as a crime; it remained officially unexplained.

Renewed Investigations in the 1990s

• In 1994, investigations reopened into Mattei's death, leading to new findings about the crash circumstances.

• Forensic analysis suggested that an explosion occurred inside the plane rather than just post-crash fire.

• Evidence indicated that a small explosive device was likely planted on board before landing.

Unresolved Questions About Responsibility

• By March 2004, authorities closed the case due to lack of evidence identifying those responsible for planting explosives.

• The unresolved nature of Mattei’s death continues to provoke speculation about who might have orchestrated it.