OpenAI and Microsoft SUED! ChatGPT Reset Ordered?

Lawsuit Against OpenAI and Microsoft

The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, alleging that they illegally used New York Times content to build chat GPT models. This lawsuit is significant and could shape how AI companies operate in the future.

Allegations Against OpenAI and Microsoft

• The New York Times alleges that OpenAI and Microsoft illegally used their content to build chat GPT models.

• The models were able to reproduce New York Times articles word for word, sometimes with dire health consequences when falsely attributed.

• This lawsuit is expected to be the most important AI legal case of our generation.

Legal Trouble for Mid Journey V6

• Mid Journey V6 has also been released, which can easily reproduce Disney intellectual property frame by frame.

• This puts Mid Journey at risk of being sued by Disney's legal team.

Implications for AI Companies

• Will OpenAI and Mid Journey need to delete their models and start from scratch?

• Will companies like Google and Meta, with their own proprietary data, have a competitive advantage?

• Elon Musk had previously stated that OpenAI was lying about not using copyrighted content.

Understanding Fair Use Doctrine

The core of the lawsuit hinges on the concept of fair use. Let's explore what fair use means in relation to copyright law.

Definition of Fair Use

• Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from rights holders.

• It typically applies to purposes such as commentary, criticism, education, news reporting, parody, and research.

• Fair use balances the interests of copyright holders with the public's interest in free flow of information and ideas.

Application to OpenAI's Actions

• OpenAI used copyrighted content from the New York Times to train their models.

• However, they were able to reproduce the content word for word, raising questions about fair use.

• If copyrighted material is used to create something new that transforms the original by adding new expression or meaning, it may still fall under fair use.

Elon Musk's Statements on OpenAI

Elon Musk had previously made statements regarding OpenAI's use of copyrighted content. Let's examine what he said.

Elon Musk's Claims

• Elon Musk stated that OpenAI was lying about not using copyrighted content.

• He believed that all AI models are trained on copyrighted data, including proprietary information.

• He also mentioned that by the time these lawsuits are decided, artificial general intelligence (AGI) will already be developed.

Lawsuit Details and Impact on New York Times

Let's dive into the details of the lawsuit filed by The New York Times against Microsoft and OpenAI and how it impacts the newspaper.

Value of New York Times Content

• The lawsuit highlights the work, creativity, and investment put into creating New York Times content.

• While copyright protects creative work, this case emphasizes the value derived from effort and investment in creating high-quality journalism.

Harm to New York Times Business

• The AI models created using New York Times' work are seen as a threat to their business.

• Defendants copied millions of copyrighted articles from various sources but gave particular emphasis to New York Times content when building their language models (LLMs).

• Even Microsoft's Bing search index copies and categorizes The Times' online content extensively.

Conclusion

The lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft by The New York Times alleges illegal use of copyrighted material in building chat GPT models. Fair use doctrine is at the core of this legal case. Elon Musk had previously claimed that OpenAI was using copyrighted data. The lawsuit highlights the value of New York Times content and the harm caused to their business by AI models based on their work. This case has significant implications for AI companies and could shape future operations in the industry.

Understanding the Impact of OpenAI's Use of Times Content

In this section, the speaker discusses the impact of OpenAI using content from The New York Times without permission and how it affects both parties involved.

OpenAI's Use of Times Content

• OpenAI's use of Times content without permission undermines the relationship between The New York Times and its readers.

• The unauthorized use deprives The New York Times of subscription licensing, advertising, and affiliate revenue.

• While the speaker understands both sides of the argument, as a content creator, they empathize with The New York Times' frustration over stolen content.

• However, as a tech-forward thinker, they also recognize that limiting AI models' capabilities could hinder their potential to change the world.

Microsoft's Deployment of OpenAI Models

• Microsoft's deployment of OpenAI models throughout its product line has significantly boosted its market capitalization by a trillion dollars in the past year alone.

• Microsoft's close partnership with OpenAI and integration of their models into various software layers have contributed to this value gain.

Negotiations and Lawsuit

• The New York Times objected to the use of their content in large language models developed by defendants (OpenAI).

• They attempted negotiations for months before filing a lawsuit against defendants.

• Defendants claim fair use protection for their unlicensed use of copyrighted content but fail to provide anything transformative or compensate The New York Times for their work.

Microsoft's Relationship with OpenAI

• Microsoft describes its relationship with defendants as a partnership involving substantial technical collaboration and preferential access to the latest gen AI models.

• This highlights Microsoft's dominance in the AI space.

Importance of Independent Journalism

• Creating original content requires significant time, effort, and financial investment from The New York Times.

• The traditional business models of news organizations have been disrupted by the internet, but The New York Times has successfully transitioned to the digital era.

• Protecting independent journalism is crucial as no computer or artificial intelligence can fill the void if news organizations cannot produce and safeguard their content.

Cost of Acquiring Times Articles

• Acquiring New York Times articles involves licensing fees, with costs ranging from $10 per article for internal distribution to several thousand dollars for commercial website usage.

• OpenAI, with its substantial resources, could afford to compensate The New York Times for using their content.

Differences Between AI and Search Engines

• Unlike search engines that exploit Times content to keep users within their ecosystem, OpenAI's use of AI models allows users to access verbatim or similar content without visiting the original source.

This summary provides an overview of the key points discussed in the transcript. It is important to refer back to the original transcript for complete context and understanding.

OpenAI's Transition to For-Profit Status

This section discusses how OpenAI, despite its early promises of altruism, transitioned to a for-profit status and became a multi-billion dollar business. It also highlights the company's shift away from openness and its close relationship with Microsoft.

OpenAI's Shift to For-Profit Status

• OpenAI quickly became a multi-billion dollar for-profit business.

• The company exploited copyrighted works belonging to The New York Times and others without proper licensing.

• OpenAI is now valued as high as 90 billion dollars and projected to generate over a billion dollars in revenue by 2024.

End of Commitment to Openness

• With the transition to for-profit status, OpenAI also ended its commitment to openness.

• Previous reports detailing the contents of training sets were no longer provided for GPT 3.5 or GPT 4.

• Commercial offerings like ChatGPT have been immensely valuable, with over 80% of Fortune 500 companies using it.

Microsoft's Involvement

• Microsoft played a significant role in the creation and commercialization of GPT language models.

• They collaborated with OpenAI in developing custom computing systems for running large-scale models efficiently.

• Microsoft had physical control over the supercomputer used for training, giving them the ability to prevent specific works from being used.

Use of New York Times Content

This section focuses on the use of New York Times content in training OpenAI's language models. It highlights the prominence given to New York Times articles and raises concerns about word-for-word replication.

Prominence of New York Times Content

• The New York Times' content was given special weight due to its quality within the training set.

• The New York Times domain ranked among the top 15 domains in the web text dataset used for training.

• Despite constituting a small percentage of total tokens, New York Times articles accounted for 22% of the weight in GPT3's training mix.

Microsoft's Knowledge and Control

• Microsoft, through its partnership with OpenAI, had knowledge of the selected works used for training.

• They had physical control over the supercomputer used for training and could have prevented the use of specific works.

• Microsoft's involvement suggests willful blindness to copyright infringement.

Word-for-Word Replication

• Examples provided show word-for-word replication of New York Times articles by ChatGPT.

• The output from GPT models closely matches the actual text from The New York Times articles.

• This replication raises concerns about copyright infringement and unauthorized use of content.

Grounding Technique and Synthetic Search Results

This section discusses grounding technique employed by OpenAI's products and synthetic search results generated using The New York Times' works. It highlights how these techniques involve copying content from the internet and producing natural language substitutes.

Grounding Technique

• OpenAI's products employ a grounding technique that involves copying relevant content from The New York Times or other sources found on the internet.

• This copied content is used as additional context for language models to generate natural language substitutes that serve an informative purpose.

Synthetic Search Results

• Microsoft Bing generates synthetic search results using The New York Times' works after April 2023 (cut-off date for training data).

• Users can request specific paragraphs or snippets from articles, which are fetched and displayed within Bing's interface.

Conclusion

OpenAI's transition to a for-profit status, their use of copyrighted material without proper licensing, and their close relationship with Microsoft raise concerns about intellectual property rights. The prominence given to New York Times content in training language models, along with word-for-word replication, further highlights the potential infringement. The grounding technique employed by OpenAI's products and synthetic search results generated using The New York Times' works add to the complexity of the situation.

The New York Times Lawsuit and AI Content Reproduction

This section discusses the New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI's GPT models for reproducing and falsely attributing content, including entire articles, to the New York Times. It highlights the negative impact on the brand and potential health misinformation caused by AI hallucinating information.

New York Times Lawsuit and Content Reproduction

• Bing and Chat GPT reproduce New York Times content word for word and even hallucinate entire articles, falsely attributing them to the New York Times. This negatively affects the brand.

• Examples include false recommendations attributed to Wirecutter and incorrect health information about non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma attributed to the New York Times.

• People relying on Chat GPT for health recommendations may be misled by its false association with a reputable source like the New York Times.

• Microsoft has benefited from its partnership with OpenAI, as Bing's usage increased after integrating GPT 4 into its search engine.

• OpenAI started inserting copyright information into each article after being notified by the New York Times, but they had previously removed such copyright management information (CMI) from their training set.

Counts in the Lawsuit Against OpenAI

This section outlines the different counts in the lawsuit filed by the New York Times against OpenAI regarding copyright infringement, removal of copyright management information (CMI), unfair competition, and trademark dilution.

Counts in the Lawsuit

1. Count One: Copyright infringement

2. Count Two: Vicarious copyright infringement

3. Count Three: Contributory copyright infringement

4. Count Four: Contributory copyright infringement against all defendants

5. Count Five: Digital Millennium Copyright Act removal of CMI

6. Count Six: Common law unfair competition by misappropriation

7. Count Seven: Trademark dilution

Implications for AI Models and Proprietary Data Sets

This section discusses the potential implications of the lawsuit on training AI models based on copyrighted content and highlights the value of proprietary data sets.

Implications for AI Models and Proprietary Data Sets

• Training AI models based on copyrighted content may face legal challenges, as seen in the New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI.

• Proprietary data sets owned by companies like Reddit, Stack Overflow, Google, and Meta will become even more valuable after this lawsuit.

• Unique and fully-owned data sets can be monetized effectively when used to train AI models.

• X's large data set used to train Grok is mentioned as an example of a valuable proprietary data set.

Root Cause of Text Similarity in GPT and New York Times

This section explores the root cause of text similarity between GPT models and the New York Times, discussing features like web search ability and massive language models' tendency to memorize information.

Root Cause of Text Similarity

• One perspective suggests that GPT 4's ability to search Google or Bing for results contributes to text similarity with the New York Times.

• Another perspective argues that massive language models tend to memorize lots of information without tracking which outputs are plagiarized or original.

• Disabling web search ability does not prevent GPT from replicating New York Times articles almost word-for-word.

Mid Journey's Lawsuit Risk with Disney Intellectual Property Reproduction

This section discusses how Mid Journey's flawless copies of Disney intellectual property could lead to potential lawsuits.

Mid Journey's Lawsuit Risk

• Mid Journey 6 created flawless copies of Disney's intellectual property, including characters like Shrek, SpongeBob, Batman, and Pokemon.

• The prompts used by Mid Journey resulted in near-identical copies of the original characters.

• The reproduction of Disney's intellectual property by Mid Journey poses a significant risk of legal action from Disney.

New Section

In this section, the speaker discusses their perspective as a content creator and their desire to be compensated when others use their content without adding value or creating something new from it.

Content Creator's Perspective

• As a content creator, the speaker believes that if someone uses their content without adding any value or creating something new from it, they should be paid for it.

• The speaker expresses their willingness to engage with the audience and invites them to share their thoughts on this matter in the comments section.

Please note that the provided transcript excerpt is brief and may not provide complete context.