Bragg's Trump election interference timeline doesn't add up: Ex-prosecutor
Trump Indictment: What's the Case?
In this video, Jesse Watters and Andy McCarthy discuss the indictment of Donald Trump by Alvin Bragg. They analyze the allegations made against Trump and whether they hold any merit.
Allegations Against Trump
- Alvin Bragg alleges that Donald J. Trump repeatedly falsified New York business records to conceal criminal conduct that hid damaging information from the voting public during the 2016 presidential election.
- The counts in the indictment begin on February 14, 2017, and continue until December 5, 2017 - months after the 2016 election.
- Even if what Bragg is alleging had something plausible to it, the actions he's alleging as criminal happened after the election.
- Alvin Breg has no case because he can't allege that Trump kept information from the public since it's legal to keep information from them.
Analysis of Indictment
- The indictment fails even in its basic purpose as an indictment which is to put the accused on notice of what he's charged with.
- When you try to flesh out and understand Bragg's story, it doesn't make sense because he's essentially saying that Trump took a bunch of actions in 2017 in an attempt to defraud voters four months earlier.
- The case could get tossed because Alvin Bragg can't read a calendar and doesn't know what the law is.
Conclusion
- Andy McCarthy concludes that Alvin Bragg has no case against Donald J. Trump.