Measure for Measure Act 1 Analysis | Shakespeare Play by Play Season 1

Measure for Measure Act 1 Analysis | Shakespeare Play by Play Season 1

Understanding Authority and Morality in Measure for Measure

The Importance of Initial Authority in Teaching

  • A common piece of advice for new teachers is to start the year strictly, as it’s easier to relax rules later than to enforce them after leniency has been established.
  • The speaker admits difficulty in following this advice, preferring to be friendly from the start, which can lead to challenges in maintaining authority later on.
  • If a teacher begins with leniency, they may need external help (like an assistant principal) to restore order when necessary, highlighting the significance of reputation in classroom management.

Introduction to Measure for Measure

  • The play opens with the Duke of Vienna feeling that his city has become unruly and seeks to restore moral order.
  • The Duke discusses his plan with Escalus but decides to appoint Angelo instead, despite Escalus being capable and experienced.

Angelo's Reputation and Virtue

  • Angelo is described as virtuous yet private; the Duke emphasizes that virtue must be shared publicly for it to have value.
  • The Duke expresses reluctance for public attention while delegating power to someone who also shuns it, raising questions about leadership and visibility.

Public Shaming as a Tool of Control

  • With Angelo in charge, Claudio is arrested for premarital sex; this reflects strict enforcement of long-standing laws that had previously gone ignored.
  • Public shaming becomes a strategy under Angelo’s rule, aiming not just at punishment but instilling fear regarding one’s public image alongside legal consequences.

Moral Ambiguity and Seeking Surrogates

  • There are doubts about whether shame effectively controls sexual behavior; many believe it merely drives such behaviors underground rather than eliminating them.
  • Claudio asks Lucio to find his sister Isabella before she enters a convent so she can plead on his behalf due to her virtuous reputation.

Duke's Strategy and the Role of Angelo

Duke's Intentions

  • The Duke confesses that he has appointed Angelo to enforce laws he himself has neglected, hoping for strict governance while maintaining his own reputation.
  • He plans to disguise himself as a friar, allowing him to gather insights from the public about their views on his leadership without revealing his identity.

Isabella's Dilemma

  • In Scene 4, Isabella discusses the convent's strict rules with a nun, highlighting her desire to completely withdraw from Vienna’s sexual politics.
  • Despite the oppressive environment, Isabella questions whether they could impose even stricter codes of conduct in response to Vienna’s moral decline.

The Call to Action

Lucio's Intervention

  • Lucio informs Isabella about her brother Claudio’s predicament and encourages her to help despite her doubts.
  • He asserts that self-doubt can prevent one from achieving potential good, prompting Isabella to reconsider her stance.

Shared Virtue and Conflict

  • Both Angelo and Isabella are portrayed as virtuous characters who reluctantly engage in societal issues: Angelo in law enforcement and Isabella in advocating for Claudio.
  • The central conflict revolves around whether Claudio should face punishment or mercy for his actions.

Questioning Chastity and Morality

Underlying Assumptions

  • The discussion raises critical questions about chastity as a virtue and its role in Vienna’s societal problems; both characters derive power from their perceived purity.
  • Characters like Lucio challenge the notion that chastity is inherently virtuous or that it addresses the city’s issues effectively.

Power Dynamics

  • Pompey suggests that regardless of legal strictness under Angelo, immoral behavior will persist due to human desires; this highlights the limitations of law against natural impulses.

Complexities of Desire and Power

Moral Ambiguities

  • The narrative explores how desire intertwines with power dynamics—punishing those who abuse authority versus addressing consensual relationships complicates moral judgments.

Character Motivations

  • Key motivations are established:
  • The Duke seeks popularity,
  • Angelo aims for moral rectitude,
  • Claudio fights for survival,
  • Isabella grapples with societal expectations while trying to save her brother.
  • Lucio questions foundational beliefs regarding virtue.
Video description

full playlist: Measure for Measure: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIN5dwcNLc0f02RC8hqUcB3Brd2FbByyb Reading Act 1 through the theme of "Reputation". This will be a full analysis of every Act of Shakespeare’s play Measure for Measure through different themes. Subscribe for future seasons of this Shakespeare Play by Play. Twitter: @Shakespearepbp Quotations from the play come from the Folgers edition: https://shakespeare.folger.edu/shakespeares-works/measure-for-measure/ Logo Design by Christina Boszik. Thumbnail art by SWSD_N -- Find him on Instagram Works Consulted: Baines, Barbara J. “Assaying the Power of Chastity in Measure for Measure.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, vol. 30, no. 2, 1990, p. 283., doi:10.2307/450518. Bernthal, Craig A. “Staging Justice: James I and the Trial Scenes of Measure for Measure.” Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, vol. 32, no. 2, 1992, p. 247., doi:10.2307/450735. Bruhn, Karen. “‘If Power Change Purpose’: Authority, Leadership, and Religion in Measure for Measure.” Leadership and Elizabethan Culture, 2013, pp. 213–227., doi:10.1057/9781137340290_13. Diehl, Huston. “‘Infinite Space’: Representation and Reformation in Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 4, 1998, p. 393., doi:10.2307/2902235. Knoppers, Laura Lunger. “(En)Gendering Shame: Measure for Measure and the Spectacles of Power.” English Literary Renaissance, vol. 23, no. 3, 1993, pp. 450–471., doi:10.1111/j.1475-6757.1993.tb01069.x. Leggatt, Alexander. “Substitution in ‘Measure for Measure.’” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 3, 1988, p. 342., doi:10.2307/2870931. Magedanz, Stacy. “Public Justice and Private Mercy in Measure for Measure.” SEL Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, vol. 44, no. 2, 2004, pp. 317–332., doi:10.1353/sel.2004.0018. Majeske, Andrew. “Equity’s Absence: The Extremity of Claudio’s Prosecution and Barnardine’s Pardon in Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure.” Law & Literature, vol. 21, no. 2, 2009, pp. 169–184., doi:10.1525/lal.2009.21.2.169. Riefer, Marcia. “‘Instruments of Some More Mightier Member’: The Constriction of Female Power in Measure for Measure.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 2, 1984, p. 157., doi:10.2307/2869924. Shakespeare, William, et al. Measure for Measure. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2020. For art: www.youtube.com/amorsciendi More Playlists: Measure for Measure: https://youtu.be/vFrmIKSmof4 The Merchant of Venice: https://youtu.be/wHUh0hsAQ8g Midsummer Night's Dream: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLIN5dwcNLc0cVK_4m64u3C_UvBd4y5esJ #shakespeare #shakespeareanalysis #measureformeasure