Women and men both hunted. No sexual division of labor for hunting in prehistoric America
The Role of Women in Early Hunting Practices
Historical Context of Gender Roles
- Discussion on traditional views where men were seen as hunters and women as gatherers, highlighting a long-standing sexual division of labor in human evolutionary history.
Introduction to the Research Paper
- Presentation by Sang-Hee Lee from UC Riverside about a paper titled "Female Hunters of the Early Americas," published in Science Advances, which challenges conventional gender roles in hunting.
Key Findings from Excavations
- Excavation at Wilamaya Patjxa, a 9,000-year-old site, revealed a young adult female associated with hunting tools, suggesting that female hunters were not outliers but part of common practice.
Details of the Burial Site
- Description of the burial site located at high altitude (3925 meters), where six individuals were found; two linked to projectile points indicating hunting activities.
Analysis of Skeletal Remains
- Examination revealed one individual (WMP6), aged 17-19 years, buried with various hunting tools. Sex determination was based on skeletal morphology and peptide analysis despite missing pelvic bones.
Evidence Against Strict Sexual Division of Labor
Broader Data Collection
- Researchers analyzed data from 429 individuals across 107 sites; findings showed that female hunters (11 identified females vs. 16 males) were widespread rather than isolated cases.
Implications for Understanding Gender Roles
- Conclusion drawn that female hunters were common throughout early Holocene America, challenging previous assumptions about strict sexual division in hunting practices.
Reevaluation of Ethnographic Studies
Critique of Past Ethnographies
- Noted that many ethnographies conducted until the mid-20th century focused primarily on male activities due to biases among male anthropologists, often neglecting women's roles.
Modern Perspectives on Female Hunters
- Recent ethnographic studies have begun to document women hunters more thoroughly; however, these modern populations do not directly represent prehistoric societies.