The origin of ‘white trash,’ and why class is still an issue in the U.S.
History of Poor White Americans
Overview of Class Hierarchy in the U.S.
- Jeffrey Brown introduces the book "White Trash," highlighting its argument about the persistent class hierarchy in America, which contradicts the national ideals of opportunity and upward mobility.
Author's Insights on Poverty
- Nancy Isenburg, a history professor, discusses how poverty is ingrained in American culture, suggesting that societal acceptance of poor individuals has become part of the national identity.
Historical Context of "White Trash"
- Isenburg explains that America's agrarian roots contributed to the concept of "white trash," linking it to British colonial ideas where property ownership was seen as a measure of success.
- She notes that a significant portion of white men were landless during Jefferson's time, challenging assumptions about widespread property ownership among early Americans.
Evolution and Meaning of "White Trash"
- The term "white trash" first appeared in print in the 1820s but has deeper historical roots tied to British colonization views on poverty and waste people.
- Isenburg argues that while some individuals have achieved upward mobility, this is not representative for all; she emphasizes that historical narratives often exaggerate social mobility claims.
Class Mobility and Geography
- The discussion shifts to horizontal versus upward mobility. Founding figures like Franklin and Jefferson envisioned opportunities for poor individuals primarily through land access rather than education or personal effort.
- Isenburg asserts that geography plays a crucial role in class distinctions today, with homeownership being a key indicator of middle-class status.
Current Political Landscape and Class Issues
- The conversation touches on how class influences contemporary politics. Politicians sometimes use class language to mobilize support or create divisions within society.
- Isenburg reflects on political rhetoric surrounding class issues, noting how politicians may simultaneously promote unity while also emphasizing class differences for strategic purposes.
Hope for Addressing Class Divisions
- Concluding thoughts suggest that confronting historical truths about class can lead to healthier discussions around socioeconomic disparities rather than relying solely on myths about equality and opportunity.