20251202 175918

Identifying Ethical Principles in Decision-Making

Justice and Autonomy

• The discussion begins with the identification of two key ethical principles: justice and autonomy. The case involves a request to accept documents submitted after the established deadline, raising questions about fairness.

• A dilemma arises where the selection officer faces pressure from both their superior and the union. This situation tests the balance between adhering to a fair process (justice) and yielding to external pressures (autonomy).

Alternatives Proposed

• Two main alternatives are proposed based on the identified dilemmas:

• Alternative A: Respecting the established timeline for document submission.

• Pros: Ensures a fair process; excludes favoritism towards the boss's daughter; may lead to union satisfaction.

• Alternative B: Accepting late submissions.

• Pros: Satisfies the boss; maintains stability for the psychologist involved.

• Alternative B has its drawbacks, including potential unrest among applicants who feel that fairness is compromised due to preferential treatment.

Decision-Making Process

• Participants discuss which alternative they would choose, with Valentina advocating for Alternative A as it aligns with maintaining an established schedule and fairness for all candidates.

• Judith supports this choice by emphasizing equality and resisting intimidation from authority figures, while Liliana echoes similar sentiments regarding adherence to pre-set timelines.

Consequences of Decisions

• The scenario explores potential outcomes following a decision. An individual reflects on their choice amidst familial discussions about workplace dilemmas, highlighting personal responsibility in ethical decision-making.

• The narrative illustrates how one might return home after making a difficult choice at work, symbolized by bringing back a box—representative of being dismissed or facing consequences for upholding one's principles.

Reflection on Ethical Dilemmas

• The importance of standing firm on ethical principles is emphasized. Individuals must navigate complex situations while considering their values against external pressures from superiors or colleagues.

• Engagement in this exercise is acknowledged positively, encouraging participation even if not everyone contributed verbally during discussions.

Final Evaluation Insights

Guidelines for Ethical Analysis

• Participants are reminded that identifying ethical dilemmas requires clear articulation based on case specifics without unnecessary justification beyond what is presented in the case study itself.

Structuring Ethical Cases

• The session outlines four stages in analyzing cases involving ethical dilemmas: identifying principles, proposing alternatives, evaluating options, and reaching solutions.

• Emphasis is placed on narrowing down identified principles to two key concepts (e.g., justice and autonomy), simplifying analysis during evaluations or examinations.

Understanding Sequential Steps in Learning

Importance of Mental Sequencing

• The speaker emphasizes the necessity of mentally sequencing steps to ensure proper execution of tasks.

• It is suggested that while actions may occur simultaneously, mental clarity on the sequence enhances performance.

• Participants are encouraged to write down cases for their final evaluation instead of relying solely on video references.

• The speaker acknowledges potential confusion with video content and advocates for written explanations to clarify understanding.

• Acknowledgment and gratitude are expressed towards participants for their engagement and contributions.