Sesión Ordinaria del Concejo Municipal 27-01-26 - 9 am

Sesión Ordinaria del Concejo Municipal 27-01-26 - 9 am

Council Session Initiation Overview of the Council Meeting

Verification of Quorum

  • The session begins at 9:30 AM on January 27, with a call to verify if the quorum is present.
  • Various council members are called out, confirming their presence, including Regidora Milagritos Ester Quintana Mogollón and Regidor Óscar Fausto Fernández Cáceres.
  • The secretary confirms that the quorum is met, allowing the meeting to proceed.

Correspondence and Regulations

  • The secretary presents correspondence received and published regulations from January 21, 2026, regarding an information request by Regidora Vázquez Angulo.
  • Key ordinances discussed include:
  • Ordinance No. 492 related to administrative infractions and noise pollution control published on December 2, 2025.
  • Ordinance No. 489 concerning updates on property tax declarations for fiscal year 2026 published on December 5, 2025.

Municipal Decrees and Resolutions

  • On December 9, a decree modifies procedures for municipal authorization requests in public spaces.
  • A resolution approving modifications to non-exclusive services was published on December 17, alongside another ordinance providing discounts for administrative fines in La Molina district.
  • The council discusses a decree declaring the year 2026 as "the year of hope and democratic strengthening," published on January 23, 2026.

Legal Opinions and Vacancies

  • A legal opinion regarding unexcused absences by Regidor Óscar Fausto Cáceres is presented; it notes potential grounds for vacancy under municipal law due to missed sessions.
  • A petition for his vacancy based on subsequent appeals is mentioned but rejected by the council; this decision will be forwarded to relevant authorities for further action.

Land Use Change Request

  • The council receives a request regarding changing land use from residential low density (RDB) to commercial (CZ) for a specific property but declares it unfavorable after review.

Recognition Proposals

  • Discussion includes recommendations from the Commission of Decorations proposing honors for various individuals during La Molina's anniversary celebrations based on their contributions to the district's development. Names mentioned include Renzo Andrés Rallardo Barreto among others recognized for their service.

Council Meeting Proceedings

Introduction of Members

  • The meeting begins with the introduction of various members, including Carlos Manuel Adriancén Cabrera and others, indicating a formal setting for discussion.

Agenda Inclusion Vote

  • A proposal is made to include an item in the agenda regarding the approval of projects related to awarding honors, necessitating a vote as it was not initially included.
  • The secretary is instructed to proceed with the voting process for this inclusion. Members are asked to raise their hands if they agree.

Voting Results

  • The results show five votes in favor and four against, leading to the decision that the item will be added to the agenda. This reflects a close division among council members on procedural matters.

Reports and Conduct Guidelines

  • Following the agenda approval, reports are introduced with specific guidelines: they should be concise (not exceeding 5 minutes) and respectful towards all participants, emphasizing decorum during discussions. Violations may lead to disciplinary actions against members who use offensive language.

Report on Fiscalization Activities

  • Regidor Ralf Sánchez presents findings from a final report on fiscalization activities conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, highlighting issues such as inadequate internal control systems and lack of accountability mechanisms within certain departments. This indicates ongoing challenges in governance practices.

Key Findings:

  • There is an identified absence of formal responsibility assignments for implementing recommendations from oversight bodies.
  • Weaknesses exist in action plans regarding defined timelines and measurable goals.
  • Communication deficiencies have been noted between departments affecting information flow and accountability processes.

Recommendations:

  • It is suggested that action plans must include specific activities, responsible parties, deadlines, measurable goals, and progress indicators according to regulatory directives.
  • Establishing an internal control mechanism for timely compliance with recommendations is deemed essential for effective governance moving forward. This includes regular updates on compliance status shared with council members for collective evaluation purposes.

Importance of Continuous Communication:

  • Emphasizing continuous communication between administration and council members is crucial for monitoring compliance effectively; this ensures transparency in governance practices over time. Additionally, past deficiencies related to direct contracts versus public tenders are highlighted as areas needing further scrutiny by council members moving forward into future sessions.

Municipal Concerns and Community Issues

Review of Municipal Contracts

  • The municipality is expected to review its ability to contract with companies that have previously faced scrutiny from the control body. This information will be shared with the Council for awareness.

Public Disorder and Safety Concerns

  • On January 24, a public event at Estadio Monumental led to disturbances caused by unruly fans, resulting in attacks on local security personnel. Residents are increasingly frustrated with this ongoing issue.
  • Previous requests were made for the municipality to consider legal action against these disturbances, as they infringe upon residents' rights to safety and free movement.

Community Engagement Initiatives

  • The commencement of sports and dance workshops across various districts has been positively received by residents, providing access for adults, youth, and children alike. This initiative aims to enhance community engagement.

Advocacy for Senior Citizens

  • A focus on senior citizens at Sian de la Molina (now Opami) highlights their mistreatment by the municipality; many are forced into public spaces for recreational activities due to lack of access to their designated facilities.
  • The municipal government's response has been characterized by intimidation tactics rather than constructive dialogue or support for vulnerable populations like seniors. This includes deploying security forces against them instead of facilitating their needs.

Critique of Municipal Practices

  • There is a significant concern regarding how the municipality handles communications related to payment demands; documents issued do not comply with legal standards and serve more as intimidation tools than legitimate notices. These practices disproportionately affect vulnerable groups such as elderly residents facing financial pressures.
  • The use of coercive language in informal collection notices raises ethical questions about municipal governance and its impact on community trust and well-being, particularly among those who may already be struggling financially.

Clarification on SIAM and PAMI Programs

Distinction Between SIAM and PAMI

  • The speaker emphasizes that the SIAM (Centro de Adulto Mayor) remains active alongside decentralized SIAMs, clarifying that it should not be confused with the PAMI program.
  • The PAMI is a state policy established by legal norms from May of the previous year, implemented by the Ministry of Women and Vulnerable Populations, which also operates within Parque de los Niños where SIAM functions.
  • Both programs are being executed by La Molina municipality; they are distinct initiatives aimed at supporting older adults without one displacing the other.

Importance of Accurate Information

  • The speaker requests that misinformation regarding the relationship between PAMI and SIAM be corrected to prevent public confusion, noting that some former mayors have exploited this misunderstanding for political gain.
  • The intergenerational adult program allows elderly individuals to share their knowledge with younger generations while receiving compensation from the municipality, reinforcing its value as a state policy.

Concerns Raised About Elderly Support

Issues Faced by Older Adults

  • Regidora Perla Espinosa highlights concerns about older adults feeling unsupported due to perceived separation between SIAM and PAMI, questioning what happens to those outside these programs.
  • There is an ongoing confrontation involving local authorities and older adults who have been vocal about their rights for several months, indicating a broader issue of neglect in Lima Metropolitana.

Call for Dialogue

  • Espinosa urges local officials to engage directly with older adults to clarify misunderstandings and improve relations rather than allowing tensions to escalate further.

Request for Program Data

Inquiry into Beneficiary Numbers

  • Regidor Palomino requests information on how many elderly beneficiaries are served by the PAMI program compared to national programs like Pension 65, which has over 800,000 beneficiaries across Peru.
  • He expresses concern over potential mismanagement or lack of benefits provided under local initiatives like Centro Integral del Adulto Mayor versus broader state programs.

Clarification on Program Approval

  • Palomino notes that there seems to be confusion regarding council approval for these programs and stresses the need for clear communication about their distinctions.

Addressing Urban Development Issues

Importance of Decentralization and Problem Resolution

  • The speaker emphasizes the benefits of decentralization, including free workshops and access to facilities assigned to community members. They urge the mayor to take decisive action on ongoing issues.
  • A call is made for a definitive solution to persistent problems faced by the council, highlighting that constant issues reflect poorly on its reputation.

Accountability in Urban Management

  • The speaker criticizes the urban development manager's inability to resolve issues, suggesting that poor performance from certain officials affects public perception of leadership.
  • There is a focus on providing seniors with a peaceful retirement, stressing that solutions should prioritize human needs over personal agendas.

Legal Framework and Council Responsibilities

  • The discussion shifts to legal responsibilities outlined in Article 9 regarding non-delegable functions of the council, emphasizing that actions taken by officials without proper authority are invalid.
  • The speaker requests clarification from the mayor about which functions have been delegated and whether these align with municipal law, indicating potential administrative or legal repercussions for improper delegation.

Social Program Management

  • It is noted that social programs were previously managed by different departments, raising questions about accountability and clarity in roles following changes in organizational structure.
  • A suggestion is made for forming a committee within the council to evaluate social program developments due to recurring concerns from constituents seeking clear answers.

Community Requests and Local Issues

  • Specific community requests are presented, including repairs needed on local infrastructure (e.g., potholes), updates on legislative proposals concerning environmental regulations, and traffic management during construction projects.
  • An inquiry into past maintenance activities highlights ongoing concerns about local environmental management practices related to tree trimming near public spaces.

Discussion on Local Issues and Community Concerns

Concerns About Surveillance Cameras

  • The speaker expresses surprise that surveillance cameras were reportedly under maintenance during a time when there were issues with littering and weeds in the area. This raises questions about accountability regarding community safety.
  • Specific details are provided about the condition of the area, including dry branches, palm leaves, and black garbage bags, suggesting neglect or oversight by local authorities. The speaker indicates this could be perceived as harassment towards elderly residents.

Elderly Residents' Safety

  • There is a mention of elderly residents being victims of theft related to their equipment used for activities in the community center, highlighting concerns for their safety and well-being. The speaker emphasizes that these individuals are not just a few but represent many vulnerable members of the district.
  • A strong emotional response is noted from the speaker regarding comments made by an official who seems to trivialize the situation faced by elderly residents, indicating a disconnect between officials and community realities. The speaker challenges this perspective as insensitive.

Political Implications

  • The discussion shifts to political actions taken by former officials, where gifts such as towels and speakers are viewed skeptically as attempts to gain favor rather than genuine support for the community's needs. This raises questions about motivations behind public service actions.
  • An ongoing debate ensues regarding whether certain actions are politically motivated or genuinely beneficial for constituents, with tensions evident between different council members over interpretations of these actions.

Requests for Accountability

  • A municipal council member requests reports on various local services and interventions related to community centers, emphasizing transparency in operations and adherence to legal standards concerning municipal resources and advertising practices. This reflects a push for accountability within local governance structures.
  • Specific inquiries include inspections at local facilities, technical reports on city services like waste management, and clarifications on unauthorized use of municipal branding by private entities—indicating concerns over potential irregularities in municipal operations.

Addressing Political Messaging

  • Another council member calls attention to inappropriate political messaging on official municipal pages, advocating for non-partisan communication strategies that respect public trust in government institutions while addressing community needs effectively. This highlights ongoing debates about politicization within local governance contexts.

Procedural Matters

  • As discussions progress into procedural matters concerning quorum verification among council members present at the meeting, rules governing debate participation are reiterated to ensure orderly conduct during discussions moving forward into agenda items outlined for consideration later in the session.

Change of Land Use Proposal in La Molina

Overview of the Proposal

  • The proposal involves changing the land use designation from low-density residential (RDB) to zonal commerce (CZ) for a 1026 m² property located at Avenida La Molina 1230, as requested by William Marín Díaz.
  • This request is made under Ordinance 2086, which governs such changes in land use.

Details of Current and Proposed Zoning

  • The current zoning allows for low-density residential development, while the proposed change would permit various commercial activities including restaurants and other services.
  • A visual comparison shows that the property is currently marked in yellow (low-density residential), while the proposed zoning would allow for more intensive commercial activities.

Justification for Change

  • The applicant aims to develop a restaurant on the site; however, approval would allow for all types of uses permitted under zonal commerce regulations.
  • Currently, there is a single-family home on the property with some existing structures that do not align with typical residential use.

Community Impact and Concerns

  • The surrounding area predominantly features low-density housing with no multi-family units or high-intensity commercial activities, indicating a strong community preference for maintaining current zoning standards.
  • Traffic congestion is noted as an issue due to high vehicle flow on nearby major roads like Avenida Javier Prado and Avenida La Molina. This raises concerns about increased traffic from potential new businesses if approved.

Regulatory Considerations

  • According to local regulations, any change in zoning must apply to an entire block front rather than just one lot; thus, approval could lead to broader implications for neighboring properties.
  • The proposed change could enable significant developments such as bars, discotheques, supermarkets, and other high-impact businesses that may alter the character of the neighborhood significantly.

Public Consultation Results

  • A public consultation was conducted where only 47 residents responded; out of these responses, 41 were unfavorable towards the proposed change compared to just six favorable opinions. This indicates strong community opposition against altering the zoning status.
  • Technical opinions from urban planning departments also reflect disapproval based on existing low-density residential characteristics of the area and potential negative impacts from increased commercial activity.

Concerns Over Zoning Changes

Community Opposition to Zoning Change

  • The local community is largely against the proposed zoning change, with 87% of residents opposing it due to concerns about increased traffic congestion in the area.
  • Residents argue that the proposed change does not align with the district's development model, which emphasizes orderly urban growth and prioritizes residential use with adequate accessibility.

Technical Assessment of Zoning Request

  • According to Ordinance 2086, any request for a zoning change must align with the area's development objectives; thus, this particular request is deemed technically unfavorable.
  • The discussion highlights that if approved, the zoning change could lead to more commercial developments than intended, potentially altering the character of the neighborhood.

Specific Concerns Raised by Officials

  • Questions arise regarding how existing businesses (like gas stations and fast-food outlets) impact residential areas and whether they justify further commercial expansion. Officials express skepticism about future demand for additional commercial spaces in an already congested area.
  • There are concerns about potential discrimination claims from property owners if their requests are denied based on economic grounds, indicating a complex interplay between community needs and individual rights.

Clarification on Development Intentions

  • A council member seeks clarification on what type of establishment is being proposed for the site in question, suggesting it may be a restaurant given its proximity to other food outlets like Bembos. This raises questions about long-term implications for zoning integrity.
  • It is noted that while a restaurant may seem innocuous now, approval could open doors for various types of commercial activities in the future, including larger establishments like shopping centers or bars.

Zoning Changes and Community Impact

Discussion on Zoning Change Proposal

  • The speaker expresses concern over a proposed zoning change to "comercio zonal" (zonal commerce) for a block that includes a fast-food restaurant and a clinic, suggesting it could lead to undesirable businesses like mechanical workshops.
  • The speaker questions whether the zoning change would affect just the property in question or the entire block, indicating potential widespread implications.

Legal Framework and Current Regulations

  • A council member clarifies that Lima's ordinance 2086 prohibits changing the zoning of individual lots; any changes must apply to at least the entire front of the block.
  • The discussion touches on past licensing for existing businesses under residential zoning, noting future activities will need to comply with current regulations if changes are approved.

Diverging Opinions Among Council Members

  • Regidor Palomino acknowledges differing views among council members regarding commercial development, emphasizing some believe new businesses can invigorate local dynamics despite concerns about maintaining residential areas.
  • Another council member argues against denying all commercial proposals outright, highlighting existing commercial activity in nearby areas as justification for supporting some changes.

Community Sentiment and Technical Considerations

  • Regidor Talavera supports the architect's clear explanation against approving the change based on community opposition (70% disapproval), stressing that decisions should not favor specific investors without broader community support.
  • Regidor Sánchez raises concerns about past unexpected zoning changes in La Molina over two decades, advocating for an evaluation by the Urban Development Commission to ensure consistency with technical parameters and community needs.

Call for Review of Past Zoning Changes

  • There is a consensus among council members that previous zoning changes may have lacked proper oversight, leading to inconsistencies such as car washes and mechanical workshops appearing in residential areas.
  • A proposal is made for the Urban Development Commission to investigate historical zoning decisions thoroughly, aiming to establish clearer guidelines moving forward.

Clarification on Commercial Licenses

  • A query arises regarding what types of establishments could be permitted under "comercio zonal," confirming that while gas stations cannot be included, shopping centers are allowed.

Discussion on Zoning Change and Honors in La Molina

Zoning Change Proposal

  • The council discusses a proposal to change the zoning classification from low-density residential to zonal commerce for a 1026 m² property located on Avenida La Molina.
  • A vote is called, with members raising their hands to indicate agreement or disagreement with the proposal. The outcome shows a majority against the change.
  • The final tally indicates three votes in favor of rejecting the proposal, one abstention, and one against it. This reflects a clear decision by the council.

Honorary Recognitions

  • Following the zoning discussion, the agenda shifts to reviewing recommendations from the Special Commission on Decorations regarding honorary recognitions for individuals contributing significantly to La Molina's development.
  • Álvaro Maiña presents proposals for awards as part of celebrating the district's 64th anniversary, emphasizing adherence to municipal regulations governing such honors.

Notable Awardees

  • Several distinguished individuals are proposed for recognition:
  • Renzo Andrés Reellardo Barreto: Mayor of Lima recognized for his contributions.
  • Diego Eduardo Martín de la Torre de la Piedra: Esteemed businessman and cultural manager in Peru.
  • Federico CFmano: Renowned archaeologist and historian known for his extensive research work.
  • Carlos Alfredo Casabone Stésel: Influential figure in construction and urban development sectors in Peru.

Additional Honorees

  • Other notable figures include:
  • Dr. Jorge Edgar José Muñiz Scheez: Acclaimed lawyer with experience in national parliament service.
  • Alfonso Baella Herrera: Expert in political communication and media analysis recognized for his impactful career in journalism.
  • Julia Santolaya Fernández: Anthropologist and writer dedicated to cultural heritage preservation efforts in Peru.

Community Contributions

  • The list also includes community-focused individuals like Consuelo Elías Aparicio de Canales, who has made significant strides in social initiatives aimed at enhancing citizen participation and solidarity values within communities.
  • Guillermo Yacosa Antelo is highlighted as an influential journalist whose work has shaped public discourse through insightful commentary on national issues while promoting cultural activities through institutions like Rinconada Country Club and Colegio San José Marelo, both integral parts of local heritage and education systems respectively.

Council Meeting Discussion

Political and Social Context

  • The speaker discusses the political, social, cultural, and historical context of their country and district, emphasizing its importance in local governance.

Issues with Leadership

  • Concerns are raised about the mayor's failure to adhere to council regulations and his tendency to interrupt discussions, which undermines democratic dialogue.

Procedural Compliance

  • A call for adherence to council rules is made, highlighting that no council member should speak more than twice on the same issue without permission. The need for structured debate is emphasized.

Voting Process Disputes

  • Tensions arise as members push for a vote on proposed agreements despite claims that there has been insufficient discussion on the matters at hand. The urgency of moving forward is stressed by multiple participants.

Accusations of Political Bias

  • An accusation is made against the mayor regarding alleged political bias in decision-making processes, prompting a defense from the mayor who insists he does not follow party instructions blindly. This highlights underlying tensions within the council dynamics.

Qualifications for Honors

  • A member questions the qualifications of individuals being honored by the municipality, arguing that true contributions to La Molina should be recognized rather than merely professional achievements without local impact. Specific examples are provided to illustrate this point.

Importance of Proper Recognition

  • Emphasis is placed on ensuring that municipal honors reflect genuine contributions to community welfare rather than superficial accolades; this includes a critique of how awards are currently being distributed without proper consultation or criteria adherence.

This structure provides an organized overview of key discussions during the council meeting while linking back to specific timestamps for further reference and clarity.

Debate on Honorary Decorations in La Molina

Voting Process Initiation

  • The mayor initiates the voting process regarding the approval of honorary decorations for various personalities in celebration of the district's 64th anniversary.
  • Council members are asked to raise their hands if they agree with the proposal.

Discussion on Respect and Authority

  • A council member expresses frustration over being interrupted, emphasizing that elected officials deserve respect and should be allowed to speak without restrictions.
  • The speaker insists that internal regulations must be followed and highlights that the decorations are meant for local residents, not political figures seeking candidacy.

Concerns Over Political Implications

  • The speaker warns fellow council members to be cautious with their votes, suggesting that some may have ulterior motives related to upcoming elections. They declare their intention to vote against the proposal.
  • Another council member laments that a moment meant for community celebration is being overshadowed by subjective opinions about nominees' contributions. They call for respect towards all nominated individuals.

Recognition of Nominees' Contributions

  • Specific nominees are mentioned, including Father Gastón Garatea and Consuelo Olías Aparicio de Canales, highlighting their significant contributions to the community amidst challenges like invasions.
  • The importance of recognizing local figures who have shaped La Molina is emphasized, alongside a call for transparency regarding any objections against nominees’ qualifications.

Call for Inclusivity in Nominations

  • A council member stresses that no other proposals were received by the decoration committee and suggests holding an extraordinary session to consider additional nominations before finalizing decisions. This reflects a desire for inclusivity in recognizing community contributions.
  • There’s acknowledgment from another member about the merit of proposed honorees but also a sentiment that many unsung heroes within La Molina remain unrecognized despite their foundational roles in building the district's identity.

Recognition of Contributions in La Molina

Historical Context and Community Efforts

  • Many individuals sacrificed their lives to build the beautiful district of La Molina, highlighting the community's dedication and struggle for essential services like electrification and water supply.
  • The contributions of local figures, including those who built key infrastructures such as police stations and social clubs, are often overlooked by newer residents unfamiliar with the district's history.

Honoring Past Leaders

  • There was an intention to recognize former mayor Figueroa for his contributions; however, he had already been honored previously. Instead, they aimed to honor Mayor Harmsen posthumously through a family recognition event.
  • Plans are underway to create a park or rename a street in honor of Mayor Harmsen, ensuring that his legacy is not forgotten within the community.

Future Recognition Initiatives

  • A proposal was made to hold a solemn session on March 8th (International Women's Day) to honor women from La Molina alongside other significant recognitions during national celebrations in July.

Discussion on Recognition Criteria

  • A suggestion was made to amend the recognition criteria in official documents to include specific mention of benefits provided to the district of La Molina, emphasizing local impact over broader national service.
  • Concerns were raised about potential misinterpretations or "desnaturalization" of awards if they do not clearly reflect contributions specifically benefiting La Molina.

Voting Process and Outcomes

  • The council proceeded with voting on various proposals for honors related to the 64th anniversary of La Molina’s establishment. Some members expressed dissent or abstained from voting due to concerns about agenda transparency.