Стенды

Discussion on Facility and Production Plans

Overview of Space Utilization

• The facility at Taganka is deemed suitable but excessive in size, with a total area of 780 m². This space includes stands that cannot be placed near vibration or engine test stands.

• Plans include establishing a warehouse and a workshop for mechanical work, indicating the need for versatile space usage.

Production Agreements and Assembly Locations

• An agreement has been reached regarding composite elements production in Kazan, while final assembly for certain components will remain at Timiryazevskaya.

• The main plan involves conducting final assembly in Kazan, which may limit regular interactions with key personnel from the team.

Collaboration Opportunities

• There is potential collaboration with Turbom, a turbocharger factory in Melitopol, which possesses extensive manufacturing capabilities except for specific parts related to internal combustion engines.

• If this partnership progresses towards serial production, some testing stands may need to be relocated to Melitopol.

Quality Control and Logistics Challenges

• Initial operations will still require proximity to Moscow for quality control and modifications; however, future adjustments might necessitate equipment relocation.

• Current options are limited to two viable solutions that require decisions regarding operational logistics and legal frameworks.

Financial Considerations and Bureaucratic Hurdles

• Engaging with external facilities introduces bureaucratic processes that could delay project timelines due to required approvals for testing programs.

• While professional staff can enhance productivity, training on specific measurement equipment will still be necessary.

Project Timeline and Infrastructure Needs

• Work on projects will not commence until snow melts; thus preparations are expected to begin around April when facilities can be adequately prepared.

• Significant renovations are needed before moving equipment into the new facility; financial support from the partner company is anticipated but specifics remain unclear.

Long-term Operational Concerns

• Once equipment is installed at the new site, it may become challenging to relocate it again due to technical or legal constraints associated with contracts.

• Discussions indicate that initial setup costs might be covered by current expenses allocated by the partner company.

Discussion on Contractual Agreements and Equipment Testing

Overview of Contractual Framework

• The discussion revolves around a contract for equipment testing, emphasizing the simplicity of the agreement where one party provides equipment for testing purposes.

• Payment for services will be calculated based on established norms, specifically hours worked multiplied by an hourly rate.

Resource Allocation and Staffing

• There is flexibility in staffing; personnel can be allocated to various tasks depending on the number of tests conducted.

• Anticipation exists that work hours may fluctuate based on project needs and potential expansions in engine development.

Insights from Melitopol's Engine Manufacturing Expertise

• Melitopol is highlighted as a center of excellence in engine manufacturing within the former Soviet Union, with significant expertise noted.

• The hope is to collaborate with Melitopol to develop products based on existing engines, leveraging their engineering talent.

Equipment Requirements and Testing Facilities

• Acknowledgment that while Keldysh has knowledge about engines, it lacks specific capabilities for certain types of tests currently needed.

• Discussion includes necessary equipment like vibration tables and climate chambers, indicating logistical considerations for testing setups.

Coordination Between Locations

• Suggestion made to potentially relocate some equipment (vibration table and climate chamber) to Kazan if deemed more beneficial for ongoing projects.

• Emphasis on collaboration between different locations (Kazan and Melitopol), ensuring resources are utilized effectively without redundancy.

Distinctions Among Testing Stands

• Clarification provided regarding four distinct test stands: two for electric motors and two for internal combustion engines (ICE).

• Each stand serves different functions—some equipped with braking systems while others have screw mechanisms, allowing varied parameter measurements during tests.

Potential Testing Strategies

• Proposal to conduct certain material tests at Kazan using available facilities without requiring constant presence from engineers.

• Focus remains on material qualification as a primary concern, suggesting that local contractors also possess adequate testing capabilities.

Discussion on Laboratory Setup and Budgeting

Overview of Laboratory Requirements

• The conversation begins with a discussion about the need for a laboratory setup, specifically mentioning the potential to conduct tests for various projects simultaneously.

• There is mention of available space at "SmartТ" for setting up testing stands, indicating logistical considerations in choosing locations.

• A suggestion arises to focus only on four specific engine test stands rather than all setups, emphasizing efficiency in resource allocation.

Evaluation of Potential Locations

• Preference is expressed for a previously viewed location due to its spaciousness and minimal required modifications compared to other options.

• Concerns are raised about some proposed spaces being dark and lacking windows, which could affect working conditions.

• The importance of adequate airflow in the chosen facility is highlighted as a critical factor for operational effectiveness.

Budget Considerations

• A budget of 80 million is allocated for conducting tests; there’s an inquiry into whether establishing an independent center would be more cost-effective than collaborating with existing facilities.

• Discussion includes the need to clarify project goals before further negotiations with stakeholders regarding methodologies and support services.

Methodology Challenges

• There are concerns about obtaining necessary methodologies from partners, particularly regarding compliance with established standards (ГОСТ).

• It’s noted that while assistance will be provided by partners, there may be limitations based on their equipment compatibility and existing protocols.

Testing Timeline Issues

• The timeline for testing procedures raises alarms; it’s suggested that current methodologies may lead to prolonged testing periods extending beyond feasible deadlines.

• Specific reference is made to needing certification by June, highlighting urgency in completing engineering tests within a constrained timeframe.

Conclusion on Center Selection

• The discussion concludes with a preference for utilizing the Keldysh Center as the primary option due to its ability to alleviate many logistical challenges associated with methodology development and specialist involvement.