ChatGPT: O Analista Profissional Que Você Sempre Quis Ter

Introduction

In this episode, the focus is on creating a prompt for GPT to transform it into a knowledgeable senior scientist specialized in project analysis and evaluation within a specific field of expertise.

Transforming GPT into a Senior Scientist

• The prompt will take on the role of a senior scientific critic, specializing in various fields such as fashion design, video editing, or coaching.

• Users can customize the prompt by assuming different roles like an editor or coach, using the term "senior" and specifying their area of expertise.

• Specialization involves analyzing and evaluating scientific projects, with a focus on areas like Medicine and Cardiac Diseases.

Detailed Project Evaluation Process

• Emphasizes attention to detail as crucial for balanced feedback during evaluations.

• The analysis includes qualitative assessment using tools like SWOT analysis to identify project strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

• Additionally, there is a macro-environmental analysis considering political, economic, social, and technological factors influencing the project.

Quantitative Evaluation

This part delves into quantitative evaluation methods employed by the prompt to provide a comprehensive assessment based on experience and knowledge.

Quantitative Assessment Process

• Utilizes a five-star rating system to evaluate projects quantitatively based on responses provided.

• Offers suggestions for improvement after providing ratings from 0 to 5 for better project positioning.

• Requests detailed project information for thorough evaluation following initial prompts.

Project Presentation Template

Exploring the template structure for presenting projects effectively to receive comprehensive evaluations from the GPT prompt.

Structuring Project Details

• Specifies project type (e.g., research project), title formulation guidelines, and tags inclusion for referencing purposes.

• Demonstrates how to craft concise summaries focusing on therapeutic potential exploration of nanoparticles in cardiac treatments.

Nanoparticles Application in Heart Failure Research

In this section, the speaker discusses the absence of YouTube videos on nanoparticles applied to heart failure, highlighting it as a gap in scientific knowledge or project planning. The objectives, both general and specific, are outlined along with the methodology and expected impact of the research project.

Objectives and Methodology

• Investigate the application of nanoparticles in heart failure research.

• General objective: exploring nanoparticle application.

• Specific objectives: qualitative and quantitative evaluations.

• Approach:

• Utilizing a mixed method involving qualitative and quantitative assessments.

• Expected Impact:

• Aims to bring new insights into heart failure treatment using nanoparticles.

Project Evaluation

• Critique by an expert:

• Innovative project focusing on nanoparticles in laboratories.

• Strengths include mixed research methods but lacks detailed team information.

• Weaknesses involve unknown risks due to the novelty of nanoparticles.

• Opportunities:

• Significant contribution to research field.

• Potential for patents and interdisciplinary collaborations.

Risk Analysis and Recommendations

• Ethical Risks:

• Need for careful regulation due to financial dependencies.

• Potential Challenges:

• Unforeseen difficulties in experimental nature of the project.

• SWOT Analysis:

• Identifying strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

• PESTEL Analysis:

• Evaluating political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors.

Social Impact and Research Assessment

• Social Impact:

• Improving population health through advanced technologies.

• Environmental considerations in nanoparticle production and distribution.

• Project Evaluation Feedback:

• Recognized as innovative but lacking detailed research information.