Biomechanics of Movement | Lecture 8.2: Leaping into Inverse Dynamics Analysis of a Vertical Jump

Biomechanics of Movement | Lecture 8.2: Leaping into Inverse Dynamics Analysis of a Vertical Jump

Inverse Dynamic Analysis in Maximum Height Jump

Introduction to Inverse Dynamic Analysis

  • The video introduces the concept of inverse dynamic analysis, focusing on calculating sagittal plane moments about the ankle, knee, and hip during a maximum height jump.
  • A research question is posed: "What are the sagittal plane moments about the ankle, knee, and hip during a maximum height jump?"

Data Collection for Analysis

  • Data collection involves using a force plate to gather ground reaction forces and motion capture sensors placed at key joints (hip, knee, ankle).
  • Additional data includes joint angles, angular velocities, angular accelerations, and EMG data for muscle force estimation validation.

Experimental Setup

  • The experimental setup features participants crouching before takeoff; only projectile motion needs simulation post-takeoff.
  • A model with four body segments (foot, shank, thigh, hat segment for head/arms/trunk) is utilized for calculations.

Required Model Parameters

  • Essential parameters include masses and inertias of body segments along with distances between joints (e.g., distance from ankle to knee).
  • Calculations will be performed at each time point leading up to takeoff; joint moments are plotted against time.

Analyzing Joint Moments

  • Observations indicate that hip moments peak before ankle moments—similar patterns observed in sports like baseball pitching.

Steps in Inverse Dynamic Analysis

Free Body Diagram Creation

  • The first step involves creating free body diagrams isolating each body segment while including all relevant forces and moments.

Motion Equations Formation

  • Next steps involve forming motion equations by differentiating position expressions to compute velocities and accelerations.

Application of Newton's Laws

  • Finally, Newton's second law is applied: F = ma , considering both translational and rotational dynamics without additional terms found in textbooks.

Simplified Equation Overview

  • The simplified equation focuses on taking moments about the center of mass without extra terms present in standard equations.

Visual Representation of Forces

  • A visual representation shows reaction forces (Fx, Fy), torque (T), weight due to gravity acting at the center of mass alongside known geometry.

Assumptions in Modeling

  • Assumptions include a planar system with three degrees of freedom related to angles at the ankle, knee, and hip relative to horizontal positions.

Free Body Diagrams and Forces in Biomechanics

Creating a Free Body Diagram for the Foot

  • The process begins with drawing a free body diagram of the foot, including reaction forces and moments. A ground reaction force is assumed to act at the toe during a jump.
  • The components of the ground reaction force are identified as f_xg and f_yg , drawn in positive directions for clarity, regardless of their actual direction.
  • Reaction forces at the ankle are denoted as f_x1 (negative x-direction) and f_y1 (negative y-direction), along with a negative moment to maintain consistency across diagrams.
  • Newton's third law dictates that corresponding forces on different segments must be consistent; thus, similar variables will have opposite directions in subsequent diagrams.
  • The speaker encourages viewers to derive equations based on the free body diagram before revealing them, promoting active engagement with the material.

Applying Newton's Laws

  • The sum of forces in the x-direction is established: f_xg - f_x1 = 0 . Assuming no mass or acceleration simplifies this equation to zero.
  • In the y-direction, we have f_yg - f_y1 = 0 , reinforcing that all forces balance out under static conditions.
  • Moments about the ankle are calculated by considering contributions from various forces. Choosing this point simplifies calculations since certain terms drop out due to their line of action through it.
  • Contributions from ground reaction forces are included: f_xgh - f_ygl - t_1 = 0 . This equation also equals zero due to no mass or inertia present.
  • The system can be solved if ground reaction forces (f_xg, f_yg) are known, leading to three equations with three unknowns (f_x1, f_y1, t_1).

Transitioning to Shank Analysis

  • Moving on from foot analysis, a new free body diagram for the shank segment is created using similar steps as before while ensuring clarity in representation by placing it in quadrant one.
  • Reaction forces at both ankle and knee joints are represented consistently. Forces at these points follow Newton’s third law but are drawn oppositely compared to previous diagrams for clarity.
  • Gravity's effect is incorporated into the shank diagram as an additional downward force (m_1 g), which must be accounted for when analyzing motion dynamics.

Kinematic Equations for Shank Motion

  • Kinematic equations focus on determining positions, velocities, and accelerations relative to an origin set at the ankle joint.
  • Position coordinates for center of mass are defined:
  • x_1 = r_1 cos(theta_1)
  • y_1 = r_1 sin(theta_1)
  • Derivatives of position expressions yield velocity equations; specifically, velocity in x-direction involves both radius change and angle change over time.

Understanding Joint Moments and Forces in Biomechanics

Derivatives and Acceleration of Body Segments

  • The derivative of sine is cosine, leading to the expression for velocity: x_1 dot = -r_1 theta_1 dot sin(theta_1) , where r_1 is constant.
  • The second derivative gives acceleration: x_1 ddot = r_1 (theta_1 ddot sin(theta_1) - (theta_1 dot)^2 cos(theta_1)).
  • Expressions for y_1 dot and y_1 ddot are derived similarly; refer to the textbook for details.

Applying Newton's Second Law

  • After deriving expressions, forces in the x and y directions are summed, with known ground reaction forces aiding in solving unknowns.
  • Moments about the center of mass are calculated using forces acting at joints (ankle and knee), following a similar summation approach.

Expanding the System of Equations

  • With measured ground reaction forces, only three unknowns remain (forces at knee), allowing for solvability of equations.
  • Moving to analyze the thigh segment involves creating a free body diagram and computing positions, velocities, and accelerations.

Thigh Segment Analysis

  • The same procedure applies as before; expressions become longer but follow established methods.
  • A system with six equations emerges from applying Newton’s laws to both forces and moments.

Final Body Segment: Head/Arms/Torso

  • For this segment, repeat previous steps: create diagrams, compute forces/moments. This leads to nine equations with nine unknown variables if ground reaction forces are not measured.
  • Even without precise measurements of ground reaction forces, inverse dynamic analysis can be performed across time points to derive joint moments throughout motion trajectories.

Recap on Joint Moments

Video description

Lecture by Professor Thomas Uchida of the University of Ottawa. Learn about the calculations involved in an inverse dynamic analysis. We will explore a simple example calculating the sagittal-plane moments about the ankle, knee, and hip during a maximum-height jump using experimental data including joint angles, joint angular velocities, and ground reaction forces. This lecture covers part of "Biomechanics of Movement Chapter 8: Inverse Dynamics" Lecture 8.1: Inverse Dynamics: What is a Joint Moment? https://youtu.be/zrsQIGK7Gys Lecture 8.2: Leaping into Inverse Dynamics Analysis of a Vertical Jump https://youtu.be/GqquQaA3E6A This example can also be found in the Biomechanics of Movement textbook. Learn more at https://biomech.stanford.edu/ Explore all videos on the Biomechanics of Movement YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDNGy0KKNLQ-ztcL5h2Z6zA Additional resources: OpenSim: https://simtk.org/projects/opensim Acknowledgments: Clio Delp, Sebastian Kleppe, University of Ottawa (Video Production) Marissa Lee, Melissa Boswell, Hannah O'Day (Content Review) The Stanford Human Performance Lab especially Scott Uhlrich & Julie Muccini (Demos) The University of Ottawa and Neuromuscular Biomechanics Lab of Stanford University