The Truth About the Apocrypha #apocrypha #kingjames #kingjamesonly #bibletruth #bible #truth #jesus

Name: The Truth About the Apocrypha #apocrypha #kingjames #kingjamesonly #bibletruth #bible #truth #jesus
Uploaded: 2025-06-23T13:02:36.000Z
Duration: 3 h 2 min 44 s

1 Thessalonians and the Apocrypha Discussion

Introduction to the Topic

The speaker begins by introducing the session, referencing 1 Thessalonians chapter 5 as the focal point for discussion.

Acknowledges a lack of preparation due to recent travel but expresses confidence in delivering valuable insights on the subject matter.

Key Verse and Its Implications

The key verse discussed is 1 Thessalonians 5:21, which states, "Prove all things. Hold fast that which is good." This sets the stage for evaluating the Apocrypha.

The speaker notes that verse 22, which advises abstaining from all appearance of evil, has been omitted in newer Bible versions.

Understanding the Apocrypha

The speaker addresses growing calls to accept the Apocrypha within Christian doctrine and encourages personal reading for informed opinions.

Defines "Apocrypha" as meaning hidden; it is also referred to as extra-canonical or pseudepigraphal books.

Historical Context and Definitions

Discusses historical perceptions of the Apocrypha as false writings (pseudepigrapha), emphasizing its long-standing rejection by many scholars.

Explains that these texts were excluded from sacred canon during the Reformation due to doubts about their authenticity and authorship.

Canonical Acceptance

Clarifies what "canon" means—derived from Greek, indicating a rule or measurement—and highlights that only 66 books are accepted in Protestant tradition.

Notes Jewish tradition also recognizes only 39 books as canonical, reinforcing historical resistance against including additional texts like those found in the Apocrypha.

Examination of Specific Books

Lists specific apocryphal books included in some editions of the King James Bible: First and Second Ezra, Tobit, Judith, among others.

Points out how these books were presented separately within early editions of biblical texts with disclaimers regarding their scriptural status.

Current Debates on Inclusion

Highlights contemporary arguments advocating for inclusion of these apocryphal texts into modern canon discussions.

Mentions that while some claim these works should be considered scripture based on their presence in earlier Bibles, skepticism remains prevalent regarding their origins and authority.

Exploring the Authenticity of Biblical Texts

The Nature of Suspect Texts

The speaker discusses the suspicion surrounding certain biblical texts, noting that they were found in Greek rather than Hebrew, leading to questions about their authenticity.

Excluded Books from the Apocrypha

Four books were mentioned as being excluded from the Apocrypha despite originating from the same source as other accepted texts. These are:

Epistle of Barnabas

Shepherd of Hermas

Third Maccabees

Fourth Maccabees

Understanding Canonical Origins

The speaker highlights a total of 18 extra-canonical books, emphasizing a numerical connection (6+6+6) that evokes a sense of unease regarding their legitimacy.

Sources for Old and New Testament Texts

The Old Testament is derived from the Hebrew Masoretic text, which is considered authentic and preserved by Jewish tradition. Romans 3:2 is cited to support this claim.

In contrast, the Apocrypha is noted to be absent from Hebrew texts and only present in Greek versions, raising further suspicions about its validity.

Manuscript Differences and Historical Context

For New Testament sources, Acts 11:26 indicates that early Christians were first called so in Antioch. The New Testament was written in Koine Greek due to historical influences like Alexander's conquests.

The King James Bible relies on over 5,000 manuscripts known as the Textus Receptus for its New Testament foundation.

Divergence Between Schools of Thought

A distinction is made between two schools:

School of Antioch: Advocated for a literal interpretation and preservation of scripture.

School of Alexandria: Viewed biblical texts more allegorically and skeptically.

Corruption in Alexandrian Manuscripts

Key manuscripts such as Vaticanus and Sinaiticus are criticized for containing numerous changes—over 3,000 alterations noted just within Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John alone.

Concerns Over Septuagint Translation

The Septuagint (LXX), associated with Alexandrian manuscripts, raises concerns due to its perceived corruption. Jerome's involvement post-Jesus' time is also highlighted as significant in understanding these translations.

The Role of the Latin Vulgate in Catholic Doctrine

The Translation and Its Significance

The Latin Vulgate, translated by a key figure who relied on texts, became the official Bible of the Roman Catholic Church, asserting that it contains the true word of God.

The Apocrypha's Influence

The Apocrypha is included in the Vulgate and is significant for Catholic doctrine; many teachings are derived from these texts.

Historical Context of Translations

Casiodoro Deena, a former Catholic priest, defied church law to translate the Bible into Spanish for accessibility to fellow Spaniards.

Critique of Biblical Texts

Deena criticized the old Latin translation (Vulgate), noting its errors and deviations from Hebrew texts, which he believed could have been corrected.

Views on Textual Corruption

True Bible believers reject Alexandrian texts as corrupt due to their association with Gnosticism and hidden wisdom claims.

Understanding the Origins of the Apocrypha

Gnostic Connections

The term "Apocrypha" means hidden; its origins are linked to Gnostic beliefs that promoted secret knowledge accessible only through specific groups.

Revival vs. Dark Ages

The King James Bible's reliance on different texts led to a revival period, contrasting with earlier times when corrupted texts contributed to dark ages.

Evaluating Non-Canonical Texts

Examination of Other Writings

Upon reviewing additional books like the Epistle of Barnabas and Shepherd of Hermas, inconsistencies with core Christian doctrines were noted.

Epistle of Barnabas Insights

Contrary to Pauline doctrine emphasizing salvation through faith alone, Barnabas suggests a works-based gospel approach.

Shepherd of Hermas Analysis

This text frequently references "holy church," aligning closely with Catholic terminology and practices while promoting asceticism akin to monastic life.

Understanding the Apocrypha and Its Controversies

The Nature of the Beast in Scripture

The speaker discusses a vision involving a beast, which he interprets as representing the church, specifically referencing "mystery Babylon" from biblical texts.

He expresses confusion over why one would fear a church if it is indeed identified as a beast, raising questions about interpretations of scripture.

Works Gospel and the Apocrypha

The speaker argues that certain books within the Apocrypha promote a "works gospel," suggesting they align with Catholic doctrine rather than traditional Christian beliefs.

He critiques those who selectively accept only 14 specific books from the Apocrypha while ignoring others that share similar origins.

Authority and Authenticity of Scripture

The speaker emphasizes that true scripture should not contradict itself and must be authoritative without errors, questioning how some books can be accepted as scripture when their authorship is uncertain.

He challenges claims that these books were written before Jesus, arguing evidence suggests they were composed afterward.

Language and Cultural Context

The discussion includes whether Jesus quoted from the Apocrypha, asserting that he spoke Hebrew to his audience rather than Greek, which raises doubts about claims regarding his references to these texts.

Historical Rejection of the Apocrypha

The speaker notes historical rejections of the Apocrypha by Jews, early Christians, and even King James himself due to perceived errors within these texts.

He highlights that during what is referred to as "the 400 years of silence," Jews did not accept these writings as part of their canon.

Council of Trent's Influence

The Council of Trent declared certain apocryphal books as canonical under threat of anathema for non-believers, indicating strong Catholic endorsement despite widespread rejection by other groups.

Manuscript Evidence and Timing

Finally, he points out discrepancies regarding when certain apocryphal texts were actually written versus when they are claimed to have been produced. This includes references to manuscripts found centuries after Jesus' time.

Understanding the Language of the Bible

The Use of Hebrew and Greek

The speaker argues that using German to discuss biblical texts is illogical; one should use their native language, which for Jews was Hebrew, despite some also speaking Greek for trade purposes.

The Letter of Aristius and Its Authenticity

Discussion centers on the Letter of Aristius, purportedly written around 200 BC, claiming a translation request from a pharaoh to Jewish scholars.

Many scholars consider this letter a forgery due to inconsistencies in its content regarding who was responsible for copying the Scriptures.

Translation Concerns and Historical Context

The speaker questions why the pharaoh requested translators from various tribes instead of solely from the Levitical priesthood, suggesting suspicion about the authenticity of the translation process.

Critics argue against using the Letter of Aristius as evidence for dating the Septuagint (LXX), asserting it was actually produced after Jesus' time.

Examination of the Septuagint (LXX)

The LXX contains apocryphal texts and is presented in a hexapla format with multiple columns; its fifth column is identified as originating from Origen, who lived 200 years post-Jesus.

This timeline indicates that claims about Jesus quoting from an earlier version of LXX are misleading since it did not exist during his lifetime.

King James Bible's Treatment of Apocrypha

Emphasis on why King James Bible adherents reject newer translations based on Alexandrian texts; they maintain that Jesus spoke Hebrew to connect with his audience.

Inclusion and Positioning of Apocrypha

In original King James editions, Apocryphal books were included but marked as non-canonical due to Catholic pressures during publication.

Warnings About Non-Hebrew Texts

The speaker highlights how certain books like Susanna are noted as not being in Hebrew but rather derived from Greek sources linked to Catholic traditions.

Observations on Biblical Authorship

Notable absence of God's name at the beginning of Apocryphal texts contrasts with its prominent placement in both Old and New Testaments within King James versions.

Understanding the Apocrypha: Errors and Insights

The Absence of God's Name in the Apocrypha

The Apocrypha lacks a cover page or any mention of God's name, which raises questions about its divine authority compared to other biblical texts.

This absence prompts inquiry into potential errors within the Apocrypha, as some critics claim it is filled with mistakes.

Examination of Specific Texts

Reference to Wisdom of Solomon 8:19-20 suggests themes that may align with New Age beliefs, particularly regarding reincarnation.

Notable figures in the New Age movement, such as Aleister Crowley and Madame Blavatsky, have expressed favorable views on the Apocrypha due to its alignment with their teachings.

Controversial Doctrines in Ecclesiasticus

Ecclesiasticus 3:30 states that almsgiving can atone for sins, a concept not supported by traditional Christian doctrine.

The speaker recounts experiences in a Catholic context where this belief is prevalent, highlighting a divergence from biblical teachings.

Questionable Teachings and Interpretations

Ecclesiasticus 42:14 presents a problematic view suggesting that wickedness in men is preferable to courtesy in women, raising concerns about gender bias.

The footnote interpretation complicates understanding and acceptance of this text among modern Christians.

Discrepancies in Historical Accounts

Baruch 6:3 claims an extended period of captivity (seven generations), contradicting established historical accounts of 70 years in Babylon.

This discrepancy highlights significant issues regarding the reliability of certain texts within the Apocrypha.

Contradictions Regarding Sinfulness

The Prayer of Manasses asserts that patriarchal figures like Abraham did not sin, which conflicts with biblical narratives acknowledging their faults.

The speaker expresses skepticism about the authenticity and purpose behind these writings, suggesting they may serve specific doctrinal agendas rather than true scripture.

Understanding the Errors in the Apocrypha

The Need for Salvation

The speaker asserts that biblical figures Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were sinners who required salvation, emphasizing a fundamental Christian belief in the need for redemption.

Critique of Tobit 12:9

In Tobit 12:9, it is stated that giving alms can deliver one from death and purge away all sin. The speaker rejects this doctrine as erroneous, asserting that salvation comes solely through faith in Jesus' blood.

Issues with Angelic Deception

The speaker discusses an angel named Azariah in Tobit 5:12 who lies about his identity. This raises questions about trusting angels that deceive, leading to a broader skepticism regarding the text's reliability.

Historical Inaccuracies

The Apocrypha contains historical errors; for instance, it claims a character lived during two significant events separated by 215 years. Such discrepancies challenge its credibility and raise doubts about its acceptance.

Conflicting Accounts of Antiochus

Antiochus is reported to die multiple times in different locations within the book of Maccabees. This inconsistency makes it difficult to accept these narratives as factual compared to established biblical accounts.

Errors in Historical Context

Nebuchadnezzar's Identity Crisis

Judith chapter 1 incorrectly identifies Nebuchadnezzar as king of Assyria instead of Babylon. This misidentification is deemed significant due to its implications on historical accuracy.

Rejection of Apocryphal Teachings

The speaker firmly states their disbelief in teachings suggesting that charitable acts can lead to forgiveness of sins, reinforcing their stance against accepting the Apocrypha based on perceived errors.

The King James Bible and Marginal Notes

Extremist Views on Scripture

Some individuals claim absolute belief in every word of the King James Bible, including marginal notes related to the Apocrypha. This extreme view raises concerns about interpretative consistency.

Findings from Marginal Notes

Upon reviewing marginal notes within the Apocrypha, seven instances were found where translators indicated corruption or error within the text itself—highlighting internal contradictions regarding its authenticity.

Corruption Claims Within First Ezra

Noted Corruptions

A specific note from First Ezra indicates corruption concerning names and lineage (Ezra 2:12), further questioning the integrity of texts included in the Apocrypha.

Implications for Acceptance

The presence of notes declaring parts of the Apocrypha corrupt challenges any claim that these texts are divinely inspired or without error, complicating their acceptance among believers.

Examination of the Apocrypha's Validity in Scripture

Historical and Doctrinal Errors in the Apocrypha

The speaker argues that not everything in the Apocrypha can be considered inspired, highlighting historical, doctrinal, and textual errors present within it.

Specific references are made to 1 Ezra 5:9, which suggests looking for "true numbers," indicating discrepancies in the text regarding numerical accuracy.

The speaker cites 1 Ezra 6:18 and 1 Ezra 8:2 to illustrate claims of omissions and additions within the text, questioning its integrity as scripture.

Reference to First Mcabes 6:49 indicates reliance on Josephus for biblical content, raising doubts about Josephus' inspiration status.

In discussing First Mcabes 14:28, a note points out potential corruption in the text due to letter transposition, further emphasizing concerns over textual reliability.

Scriptural Authority and Inspiration

The speaker references Titus 1:2 to assert that God cannot lie; thus any lies found within the Apocrypha challenge its validity as scripture.

Citing 2 Timothy 3:16, he questions how one can use the Apocrypha for reproof or correction if it contains errors.

He emphasizes that speaking as "the oracles of God" (1 Peter 4:11) necessitates using texts without error—implying that he cannot preach from the Apocrypha due to its perceived inaccuracies.

Historical Context of Biblical Translations

The speaker acknowledges that while the original King James Bible included the Apocrypha (1611), earlier translations like Wycliffe's Bible separated these texts based on Jerome's judgment against their inclusion.

Jerome’s reluctance to include the Apocrypha is noted; he did so under pressure but maintained his stance on their non-canonical status.

Tyndale's Bible is mentioned as lacking an Apocrypha entirely, reflecting early Protestant views against Catholic doctrine concerning these texts.

Perspectives from Early Translators

Coverdale’s Bible (1535) explicitly states that books labeled as apocryphal are not held with equal authority compared to canonical scriptures due to contradictions found within them.

Coverdale cites ancient Jewish opinions alongside those of Christians up until the Reformation period who rejected apocryphal writings based on identified errors.

The Tavernar's Bible included apocryphal texts but placed them separately, suggesting a compromise between adherence to tradition and recognition of their questionable status.

The Apocrypha and Its Place in Biblical Canon

Historical Context of the Apocrypha

Discussion on the inclusion of the Apocrypha in various Bible translations, highlighting that it was often placed out of order or in a separate section.

Reference to Matthew's Bible by John Rogers, which included the Apocrypha but stated it was not accepted as true scripture.

Emphasis on accepting only the Old Testament in Hebrew, suggesting a disconnect between modern views and historical perspectives.

Council of Trent and Its Implications

Mention of the Council of Trent (1545), which declared those who do not accept all books in the Latin Vulgate, including the Apocrypha, to be "anathema" or cursed.

The 1560 Geneva Bible included the Apocrypha but provided explanations for its non-acceptance as part of scripture.

Symbolism and Interpretation

The Bishop's Bible (1568) contained a symbolic representation of confusion associated with the Apocrypha through imagery like the Tower of Babel.

Evolution of King James Bible Editions

Initial editions of the King James Bible included the Apocrypha; however, it was removed by 1666 due to a lack of belief among translators.

King James himself expressed his disapproval towards apocryphal books, indicating they were omitted because he did not align with Catholic doctrine.

Critical Perspectives on the Apocrypha

John Reynolds criticized apocryphal texts for containing manifest errors that contradicted scripture; he labeled them as forgeries.

Gail Ripinger’s book "Serpent's Apocrypha" discusses these issues further, providing historical context about debates surrounding these texts.

Current Stance on the Apocrypha

Clear position stated: neither Joseph nor speaker accepts the Apocrypha as part of their canon; they adhere strictly to 66 books from King James Bible.

Acknowledgment that while initially included in some versions, there is no perceived value or revelation from these texts today.

The Apocrypha: A Critical Examination

The Nature and Origin of the Apocrypha

The term "apocrypha" means hidden, suggesting it should remain unacknowledged due to historical inaccuracies.

Claims regarding the Dead Sea Scrolls containing Apocryphal texts are questioned; they are reportedly in Aramaic rather than biblical Hebrew, raising doubts about their authenticity.

The speaker argues that the Apocrypha is of Alexandrian origin and supports Catholic heresies, leading to a choice not to endorse it.

Faith in Scripture

The speaker expresses confidence in the 66 books of the Bible as inspired and infallible, contrasting this with their view on the Apocrypha.

Reference to 2 Corinthians 4:2 emphasizes renouncing dishonesty and deceitful handling of God's word, framing the discussion around integrity in scripture.

Corruption and Authenticity

The speaker asserts that Egypt symbolizes corruption in biblical texts, linking this idea to where many corrupt versions originate.

Encouragement for personal reflection on accepting or rejecting the Apocrypha based on one's conscience is presented.

Collective Study and Conclusion

A collaborative study involving three other individuals led them all to conclude that the Apocrypha contains errors and cannot be accepted as true scripture.

Noting discrepancies pointed out by translators reinforces skepticism towards its validity.

Mathematical Significance of Scripture

An analysis by Brother Brandon Peterson reveals mathematical perfection within the King James Bible's 66 books when excluding the Apocrypha.

The alignment between Isaiah's structure (66 chapters corresponding with 66 books of KJV Bible) is highlighted as evidence supporting its authenticity.

Symbolism in Biblical Text

Discussion includes how Matthew references Isaiah, illustrating continuity within scripture from Old Testament prophecies to New Testament fulfillment.

Emphasis on God’s design through numerical patterns suggests divine inspiration behind scripture organization.

Interpretation of 'Gem' Concept

Mention of a table of contents spelling "gem" raises questions about interpretations surrounding scriptural significance.

Comparison between diamonds and gems serves as an analogy for discerning true value within biblical texts.

Understanding Flaws in Gems and Biblical Texts

The Nature of Inclusion in Gems

Not all diamonds or gems are perfect; they contain flaws, often referred to as inclusions.

Diamonds are rated based on the degree of inclusion, with categories such as VS1 (very slight inclusion), SI1 (slight inclusion), and I (imperfect).

Purification Process and Biblical References

The process of purifying silver involves removing impurities, which parallels the idea that even valuable items have imperfections.

The King James Bible is presented as a refined text, having gone through multiple revisions to eliminate errors or "slag."

Views on the Apocrypha

The speaker expresses a strong belief in the King James Bible while rejecting the Apocrypha due to perceived lack of divine authorship.

Emphasizes unity among believers and warns against divisive issues regarding biblical texts.

Call for Discernment in Belief

Encourages believers to prove all things and hold onto what is good, referencing 2 Timothy 2:15 about studying scripture diligently.

Asserts that accepting the Apocrypha without thorough study could lead to shame; stresses personal conviction over blind acceptance.

Historical Context and Symbolism

Discusses historical changes in biblical translations, likening them to choices made in the Garden of Eden regarding knowledge and temptation.

Draws parallels between biblical narratives and modern interpretations of scripture, warning against hidden wisdom akin to Gnostic beliefs.

Understanding the Apocrypha and Its Implications

The Garden of Eden and Forbidden Knowledge

The speaker draws a parallel between the original 1611 Bible and the Garden of Eden, warning against "forbidden fruit," which is humorously noted to be a grape rather than an apple.

Catholic Church's Practices

The speaker critiques the Catholic Church for its emphasis on consuming wine (grape juice) during communion, suggesting it symbolizes forgiveness of sins while cautioning against hidden meanings.

Stance on Apocryphal Texts

The speaker expresses a firm stance against accepting the Apocrypha, stating they are prepared to justify their beliefs before God based on their studies.

Encouragement to Explore Original Texts

Listeners are encouraged to read both an original facsimile of the King James Bible and the Apocrypha themselves, inviting personal reflection on its validity.

Insights from Enoch and Other Books

Discussion shifts to the Book of Enoch, highlighting its origins in Ethiopian scripture. The speaker warns about potential corruption in its current form due to alterations by Catholic priests.

The Validity of Extra-Biblical Texts

Corruption Concerns with Enoch

While acknowledging that there may have been a pure version of Enoch at one time, the speaker believes that existing copies are corrupt and aligned with Catholic doctrine.

Comparison with Other Biblical Books

The speaker mentions other non-canonical texts like Jasher and Jubilees but concludes that all necessary teachings are contained within the 66 books of the Bible.

Caution Against Doubts in Scripture

Emphasizing skepticism towards uncertain texts, the speaker advocates for discarding questionable writings rather than risking spiritual misguidance.

Jewish Perspectives on Canonical Texts

Jewish Rejection of Non-canonical Works

It is noted that Jews historically rejected many apocryphal texts, including Enoch. This rejection is presented as significant given their role as custodians of God's oracles.

Modern Christian Views on Apocrypha

The majority view among Christians today aligns with Jewish perspectives against accepting apocryphal works as scripture, countering claims that new revelations should be embraced in modern times.

Final Thoughts on Scriptural Integrity

Warnings Against False Prophets

A cautionary note is issued regarding self-proclaimed prophets who claim new revelations contrary to established scripture, emphasizing adherence to biblical truth over novel interpretations.

Importance of Thorough Study

The speaker reflects on their extensive study habits as preferable over ignorance, expressing frustration at those defending corrupted texts without recognizing inherent flaws.

Revival Through Established Scripture

Concluding thoughts suggest that no revival can stem from apocryphal writings; instead, true understanding comes from established biblical texts alone.

Understanding the Apocrypha and Its Relation to Jesus

The Nature of the Apocrypha

The speaker reflects on discovering the Apocrypha, noting its claims about Jesus being written before certain texts. However, skepticism arises regarding its authenticity due to potential later authorship.

Questions are raised about whether all men today possess life as stated in the text, suggesting that while it may have once been divinely inspired, alterations could render it unreliable.

Historical Context and Prophecy

The speaker expresses a preference for referencing the New Testament over the Apocrypha when discussing Jesus, questioning the credibility of texts like Ezra which might have been written long after Jesus' time.

A discussion emerges around prophecies during a supposed "time of silence" between Malachi and Matthew, highlighting inconsistencies in claims about prophetic writings from that period.

Silence and Forgery Concerns

The "time of silence" is defined as 400 years without prophetic voices according to Jewish tradition. This gap raises concerns about possible forgeries created during this void.

The absence of revelation regarding Jesus' name in the Old Testament until the New Testament is emphasized, casting doubt on earlier claims made by apocryphal texts.

Authenticity and Spiritual Discernment

The speaker notes that significant figures in biblical history were not given God's name directly, contrasting with how it was revealed in the New Testament. This discrepancy raises questions about authenticity.

Skepticism is expressed towards potential motivations behind apocryphal writings—suggesting they may be attempts to mislead rather than genuine revelations.

Community Perspectives on Scripture

Observations are made regarding individuals who feel a spiritual disconnect when reading non-canonical texts compared to traditional scripture; they sense a lack of divine cadence present in canonical works.

The unique structure and rhythm found within canonical scriptures (like those in King James Bible) are contrasted with what is perceived as foreign or strange qualities of apocryphal literature.

Conclusion on Beliefs About Scripture

A strong stance against accepting additional books beyond the 66 canonical ones is articulated due to doubts surrounding their validity; belief systems should be based on reliable sources.

Recommendations are made for engaging with historical religious sites while avoiding apocryphal influences; an emphasis is placed on unity among believers who agree on core scriptural truths despite differing views on additional texts.

Discussion on Faith and Doctrine

Insights on Apocrypha and Faith

The speaker references a book by one of the founders, indicating that it suggests not to consider the apocrypha as inspired scripture, hinting at a broader discussion about religious texts and their authority.

Emphasizing kindness, the speaker encourages listeners to appreciate differing beliefs, suggesting that having "too much faith" should not be criticized but understood.

The importance of directing faith towards the right beliefs is highlighted. The speaker warns against potential pitfalls in aligning with certain groups (e.g., Catholics), stressing the need for discernment in faith matters.

A prayer concludes the discussion, thanking God for guidance into truth and encouraging others to preach and teach accurately based on scriptural study. This reflects a commitment to doctrinal integrity.