Lies, damned lies and statistics (about TEDTalks)
New Section
In this section, the speaker discusses the idea of reverse engineering a TEDTalk by analyzing data from TED's website to create both the ultimate and worst possible TEDTalks.
Analyzing Data for Creating TEDTalks
- The speaker explores how the choice of topic significantly impacts how users react to a TEDTalk. Topics like happiness and emotions are favored, while technical topics like architecture are not well-received.
- Length of the talk plays a crucial role in its success. Longer talks tend to be more favored, except for talks aiming to be beautiful, inspiring, or funny which should be brief.
- The speaker shares rules derived from statistical analysis on successful TEDTalks, including providing a service to the audience, avoiding citing specific sources like The New York Times, and being able to fake intellectual capacity if needed.
Creating Visual Impact in TEDTalks
This section delves into the visual aspects of delivering a successful TEDTalk, focusing on speaker appearance, slides or props usage, and color psychology on stage.
Visual Elements for Impactful Talks
- Speaker appearance is discussed; longer hair than average, wearing glasses, and being slightly more dressed-up are associated with favorable ratings.
- Color psychology is highlighted as an important factor in audience perception. Talks with certain colors correlate with higher ratings on the website.
Designing Your Own TEDTalk
The speaker introduces the concept of creating personalized TEDTalks using a tool called "TEDPad," allowing individuals to craft their own talks based on selected sentences.
Crafting Personalized Talks with TEDPad
- Introducing "TEDPad," a matrix of curated sentences enabling users to design their own TEDTalk. Users can choose between white for good talks about creativity or black for bad talks about blogs and politics.