Aula Exclusiva: Como fazer uma revisão de literatura

How to Conduct a Literature Review?

Introduction and Overview

• The session begins with an introduction, thanking attendees for their presence and encouraging engagement through comments and subscriptions.

• Viewers are invited to interact with the content by liking the video and leaving questions or comments for further discussion.

• The speaker emphasizes the objective of the session: to provide a comprehensive lesson on conducting a literature review.

Importance of Literature Review

• The speaker introduces herself as Adriana Araújo, a Doctor in Education, sharing her contact information for further inquiries.

• She discusses the common lack of academic preparation among undergraduate students regarding literature reviews, highlighting that many are unaware of its necessity.

• There is an acknowledgment that students often struggle with understanding different academic genres due to insufficient training in methodologies during basic education.

Addressing Common Challenges

• Adriana reassures viewers that their confusion about literature reviews is shared by many; even she was initially unaware of its importance during her studies.

• She reflects on her own educational journey, noting that awareness about literature reviews developed gradually through persistent study.

Understanding Literature Reviews

• A literature review is defined as a comprehensive overview of how a specific topic has been addressed within a field of knowledge.

• Using education as an example, she explains how one might approach writing about early childhood education by researching existing theories and opinions on child learning processes.

• The process involves identifying key authors and theoretical frameworks relevant to one's research topic, which helps in establishing context and identifying gaps in existing research.

Understanding Literature Review in Academic Research

Importance of Literature Review

• The literature review is crucial for defining theoretical assumptions and understanding existing knowledge in a specific field, which helps justify and validate research studies.

• It serves as the foundational step in any research project, guiding decisions on objectives, questions, justifications, methodologies, and other essential details.

Resources for Structuring Research

• Viewers are encouraged to explore playlists that provide guidance on structuring their research projects effectively. Specific videos cover topics like holography in detail.

• The literature review is described as a structural step that aids researchers in making informed decisions while producing academic texts.

Steps to Conducting a Literature Review

• Key steps include:

1. Identifying relevant texts based on defined themes and keywords.

2. Collecting data from reliable sources.

3. Selecting appropriate texts for study.

• The process of literature review differs from bibliographic research; it focuses more narrowly on understanding current discussions rather than compiling extensive studies.

Techniques for Effective Writing

• Emphasis is placed on techniques that facilitate academic writing, which can significantly enhance the quality of scholarly work.

Distinction Between Literature Review and Bibliographic Research

• A literature review aims to understand ongoing conversations about a topic rather than conducting broad surveys typical of bibliographic research. This distinction is vital for framing one's contribution to academia.

Additional Learning Resources

• Viewers are directed to previous lessons available online that elaborate on conducting bibliographic research effectively, highlighting differences between various types of academic inquiries.

• Recommendations include checking out specific YouTube playlists that explain how to conduct bibliographic research comprehensively.

By following these structured insights and resources, researchers can better navigate the complexities of academic writing and ensure their work contributes meaningfully to their fields.

Understanding Digital Inclusion in Education

Key Concepts of Digital Technology in Education

• The discussion begins with the concept of "digital technology" as a compound term linked to education, emphasizing its significance in modern learning environments.

• Reliable sources for research are highlighted, including academic journals and university websites. It's crucial to utilize trustworthy platforms for gathering information.

• The speaker emphasizes defining one's area of knowledge, particularly focusing on keywords like "digital exclusion" and "digital technologies," which guide the search for relevant literature.

Research Methodology and Criteria

• A systematic approach is recommended for reviewing texts: start with titles and abstracts to determine relevance before diving deeper into full articles.

• The importance of narrowing down topics is discussed; ensuring that the focus remains on digital inclusion rather than broader technological themes is essential.

Selection Criteria for Literature Review

• Establishing selection criteria is vital. The speaker shares personal experiences from their dissertation, highlighting temporal cuts as a method to filter relevant studies effectively.

• A specific time frame (2003 to 2015) was chosen based on previous research findings, illustrating how historical context can shape current understanding of digital exclusion in education.

Types of Sources Included

• Various genres were accepted in the literature review process—articles, book chapters, theses—allowing a comprehensive view across different types of scholarly work.

• Notably, many authors cited were not primarily from educational backgrounds but rather from communication or media fields. This indicates an interdisciplinary approach to discussing digital inclusion.

Recommendations for Conducting Literature Reviews

• It’s suggested that researchers define clear criteria for their literature reviews based on their specific needs—whether seeking broad perspectives or focused scientific articles.

• For effective literature reviews, limiting searches to recent publications (last five years recommended), ensures relevancy and contemporary insights into ongoing discussions within the field.

Understanding the Importance of Methodology in Academic Research

The Role of Scientific Articles

• Scientific articles are derived from extensive research, necessitating a well-argued methodology to justify the chosen approach.

• It is crucial to define inclusion and exclusion criteria for selecting reliable sources, ensuring relevance and recency in literature reviews.

Organizing Information Effectively

• The way information is organized and extracted from texts significantly impacts the quality of academic work; being meticulous at this stage enhances confidence in results.

• Taking notes in bullet points can streamline the writing process, especially when drafting methodology sections. This practice aids memory retention and clarity.

Writing Methodology with Precision

• A descriptive methodology acts like a recipe, allowing others to replicate your research accurately; clarity here is essential for validation purposes.

• Avoid vague statements about data collection; instead, document specific criteria used for text selection to maintain transparency in your research process.

Techniques for Content Systematization

• Various techniques such as annotated bibliographies and conceptual maps can enhance content organization during literature reviews. Familiarity with these tools can improve analysis efficiency.

• Conceptual mapping serves as a visual aid that helps connect ideas within your research topic effectively; resources on creating these maps are available upon request.

Types of Fichamento (Note-taking)

Citation Fichamento

• In citation fichamento, include complete bibliographic references according to ABNT standards alongside relevant quotes that align with your study objectives. This ensures proper attribution while facilitating easy reference later on.

Bibliographic Fichamento

• Similar to citation fichamento but focuses on extracting key concepts from texts relevant to your research goals; it requires careful organization based on thematic relevance rather than mere summarization.

Textual Fichamento

• Textual fichamento involves summarizing main ideas while also incorporating personal insights or critiques; this method encourages deeper engagement with the material and fosters critical thinking skills among researchers.

Research and Analysis Techniques in Academic Writing

Importance of Structured Research

• The speaker emphasizes the significance of following ABNT norms for academic writing, particularly in structuring bibliographic references.

• A simpler approach to annotated bibliographies is discussed, highlighting the need for clarity and conciseness in summarizing sources.

• The development of brief texts with analytical frameworks is encouraged, focusing on author identification and key concepts.

Strategies for Effective Summarization

• The necessity of summarizing multiple texts is addressed; it aids retention and comprehension by distilling essential information from various sources.

• The speaker notes that while summarization enhances vocabulary and understanding, original expression is crucial when integrating ideas into one's own work.

Utilizing Conceptual Maps

• Creating conceptual maps or summaries after reading can streamline the review process, allowing for easier access to previously analyzed content.

• Annotated bibliographies serve as a foundation for literature reviews, helping define research objectives and guiding thematic exploration.

Analyzing Literature Effectively

• Identifying theoretical approaches within literature helps contextualize research findings and supports argumentation in academic writing.

• The speaker shares personal experiences with summarizing books according to ABNT standards, emphasizing the importance of capturing essential concepts accurately.

Final Considerations on Academic Writing

• Concluding remarks stress the relevance of insights gained during reading; these reflections should be integrated into final analyses or arguments presented in academic work.

• The discussion touches on how previous readings can inform current arguments without needing to revisit all source materials extensively.

• Emphasis is placed on using gathered knowledge effectively to support claims made in scholarly discussions about human interactions within educational contexts.

Methodological Insights

• The speaker highlights the importance of employing analytical techniques when reviewing literature to extract meaningful insights relevant to specific research questions.

• Conceptual mapping serves as a tool for organizing thoughts around educational themes, facilitating deeper understanding through structured analysis.

Understanding Literature Review in Research

Importance of Theme in Literature Review

• The theme of participatory research is emphasized as a significant area for literature review, suggesting its relevance and frequent application in academic discourse.

• Researchers are encouraged to identify relevant authors and texts that influence their work, focusing on the most impactful theories and concepts.

Conceptual Framework Development

• A conceptual model adapted from original frameworks is discussed, highlighting the importance of organizing knowledge effectively within qualitative research.

• Key questions (what, why, where, when) are proposed to guide the development of a conceptual map tailored to specific research objectives.

Structuring Research Findings

• The speaker shares personal experiences with students regarding demographic analysis and emphasizes clarity in presenting conclusions derived from studies.

• An expanded analysis approach is suggested for simplifying complex information into clear visual representations.

Techniques for Text Analysis

• Four techniques for careful reading and categorization of texts are introduced, encouraging systematic organization of research materials.

• The process involves identifying contrasting perspectives among authors to create distinct categories based on thematic similarities or differences.

Conducting a Comprehensive Literature Review

• A structured approach to literature review is outlined: selecting criteria for text inclusion and summarizing findings across various approaches.

• The importance of recognizing diverse methodologies within selected texts is highlighted as essential for understanding broader trends in research outcomes.

Identifying Gaps in Research

• Researchers should critically analyze existing literature to uncover gaps that could inform future studies, enhancing their contributions to the field.

• Justification for conducting new studies stems from identified gaps; this informs the framing of research questions aligned with theoretical frameworks.

Writing Your Literature Review

• Emphasis on integrating theoretical approaches into writing helps clarify the rationale behind chosen methodologies and author selections.

• Five stages or methods for extracting content from literature are presented as foundational steps toward effective academic writing.

Understanding Literature Review Techniques

Key Concepts in Literature Review

• The importance of foundational support in literature reviews is emphasized, highlighting the need for a descriptive format that aids in presenting relevant points and definitions to readers.

• A structured approach is suggested, where 20 selected academic articles can be analyzed based on specific criteria, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of digital exclusion.

• The analysis should not merely list ideas but connect them logically, showcasing relationships between different authors' perspectives and arguments.

Writing Strategies for Effective Analysis

• Emphasizing logical connections among ideas rather than treating each separately enhances the quality of writing. This involves comparing and contrasting viewpoints effectively.

• Historical context can be used as a framework for analysis; discussing changes over time (e.g., from early 2000s to 2010) illustrates how concepts evolve within the field.

Evaluative Techniques in Literature Reviews

• Critical evaluation of theories and methodologies is essential. Using an evaluative vocabulary allows writers to question existing ideas and introduce new perspectives.

• Developing a critical stance involves recognizing gaps or biases in previous works, which strengthens one's argumentation by providing depth to the analysis.

Persuasion Through Evidence

• Establishing credibility through authoritative evidence is crucial. Writers should demonstrate familiarity with their field while presenting new insights grounded in research findings.

• Incorporating personal experiences or discussions from other researchers can enhance the persuasive power of the literature review, making it more relatable and impactful.

Practical Tips for Structuring Your Review

• Three practical tips are provided:

• Use various instruments like bibliographies or conceptual maps to organize thoughts.

• Identify agreements and disagreements among authors to facilitate analytical comparisons.

• Highlight recurring concepts across texts as potential categories for deeper exploration.

• Recognizing significant terms that appear frequently can help categorize themes within your study, aiding clarity and focus during writing.

By following these guidelines, one can create a well-organized literature review that effectively synthesizes information while engaging critically with existing scholarship.

Mentorship for Academic Writing

Overview of Mentorship Program

• The speaker addresses concerns about academic writing, emphasizing that frustration is common and can be alleviated through proper guidance.

• A structured method is offered to help students write their thesis (TCC), with sessions available every Tuesday via Instagram and YouTube.

• The mentorship includes personalized attention from a qualified educator, focusing on step-by-step techniques tailored to individual writing needs.

Personalized Support Structure

• Participants receive 12 hours of live instruction, ensuring a focused learning environment with direct interaction between the mentor and mentee.

• Sessions are spaced 15 days apart, allowing time for homework assignments that reinforce learning and track progress in writing development.

Resources and Tools Provided

• Access to downloadable materials is provided to facilitate learning; specific homework assignments will target individual projects.

• A customized study schedule will be created based on each participant's availability, ensuring they meet all research milestones effectively.

Clarification of Services Offered

• The mentor clarifies that they do not write papers for students but instead teach them how to write independently while guiding them through the process.

• Emphasis is placed on understanding ABNT norms (Brazilian Association of Technical Norms), which are crucial for academic writing standards.

Application Process for Mentorship

• Interested individuals can apply via email or through a website form; eligibility will be assessed before acceptance into the program.

• Upon approval, participants will receive payment details and schedule an initial interview to discuss their work and set up a personalized action plan.

Content and Mentorship Overview

Weekly Sessions and Content Availability

• The speaker emphasizes the availability of valuable content every Tuesday at 7 PM, aimed at enhancing academic work without any cost.

• Participants are encouraged to engage in mentorship opportunities, but free resources are also available for those unable to join live sessions.

• Viewers on YouTube are prompted to subscribe, like, and comment on topics they wish to learn about or have questions regarding, fostering community interaction.

Engagement and Community Building

• The speaker shares contact information and social media handles for further engagement, highlighting the importance of staying connected through various platforms.

• There is a call-to-action for viewers to participate actively by suggesting themes or asking questions that can be addressed in future sessions.