Tercera Sesión Pública 2026 de la Sala Guadalajara del TEPJF

Opening Remarks and Session Initiation

Welcome and Quorum Confirmation

• The session begins with a cordial greeting to the audience present in the hall and those following via social media, welcoming them to the regional electoral justice venue.

• The Secretary General of Agreements confirms the legal quorum, noting the presence of key magistrates required for valid session proceedings.

Agenda Overview

• The session is officially opened, and the president requests an account of matters listed for resolution.

• It is announced that two citizen lawsuits and one general lawsuit will be addressed, with identification keys provided in advance through public notices.

Presentation of Citizen Lawsuit No. 4

Case Introduction

• The Secretary presents details on Citizen Lawsuit No. 4 from a citizen claiming to be a criminal oral judge in Sonora, contesting a decision by the State Electoral Tribunal regarding her case dismissal.

Legal Context

• The initial dismissal was based on claims that alleged actions did not constitute political violence against women due to lack of direct relation to electoral processes or political rights exercise.

Discussion on Jurisdictional Competence

Key Arguments Presented

• It is proposed that grievances raised by the plaintiff are unfounded as electoral jurisdiction is defined by the nature of contested acts rather than constitutional relevance alone.

Gender Perspective Application

• Emphasis is placed on applying gender perspective within jurisdictional limits; dismissing the complaint does not equate to denying justice since it was redirected to appropriate authorities for analysis.

Magistrate's Considerations

Insights from Magistrate Irina Graciela Cervantes Bravo

• Acknowledgment of thorough study needed for this unique case where a judge challenges dismissal based on non-electoral grounds; highlights importance of protecting electoral rights related to voting eligibility.

Clarification on Jurisdiction Limits

• Clarifies that while elements of violence may exist against public officials, such cases fall outside their jurisdiction unless directly tied to electoral matters.

Ensuring Justice and Safety

Measures Taken for Plaintiff Protection

• Assurance given that no denial of justice occurs; concerns about potential threats to plaintiff’s safety lead to precautionary measures being discussed.

Conclusion on Authority Role

• Reiterates commitment as an auxiliary authority in electoral jurisdiction, emphasizing responsibility towards safeguarding individuals involved in legal proceedings.

Discussion on Gender-Based Political Violence and Judicial Competence

Overview of the Project Resolution

• The speaker emphasizes the importance of addressing violence and safeguarding individuals' rights in public service, advocating for effective local authority intervention.

• Acknowledgment is made regarding the need for prompt and effective action to support women facing challenges in public roles, highlighting its significance for a balanced democracy.

Challenges in Judicial Authority

• The magistrate supports the project resolution, noting it presents an interesting criterion amidst recent judicial reforms that affect elected positions.

• Discussion arises about a local judge seeking protection measures against political violence despite not being elected through popular vote, raising questions about jurisdictional boundaries.

Addressing Gender-Based Political Violence

• The magistrate points out that incidents leading to the complaint are not linked to electoral processes, suggesting alternative authorities should handle such issues.

• Recognition is given to the unique situation where a non-elected judge seeks inclusion in electoral jurisdiction discussions, indicating potential gaps in current legal frameworks.

Need for Training and Awareness

• There is a call for enhanced training on gender-based political violence within various justice sectors, acknowledging existing legislative frameworks but recognizing implementation gaps.

• Past experiences highlight ongoing challenges faced by litigators when navigating cases related to gender-based political violence due to insufficient understanding among some judicial bodies.

Voting Outcome and Next Steps

• Following discussions, a unanimous vote confirms the project resolution as presented by Magistrate Irina Graciela Cervantes Bravo.

• The session concludes with confirmation of resolutions regarding citizen lawsuits while addressing procedural matters related to electoral disputes.

Review of Additional Cases

• The secretary presents another case concerning a determination from Baja California's Electoral Tribunal; it suggests confirming previous decisions based on ineffective counterarguments from the complainant.

• A proposal is made by Magistrate Sergio Arturo Guerrero Olvera to uphold prior sanctions against an individual involved in electoral misconduct, emphasizing adherence to established legal standards.

Voting Process and Resolution Confirmation

Voting on the Project

• The session begins with the secretary initiating the voting process for a project presented by Magistrate Sergio Arturo Guerrero Olvera.

• All magistrates, including Irina Graciela Cervantes Bravo and Rebeca Barrera Amador, express their support for the project, leading to its unanimous approval.

• The resolution pertains to a case (Juicio de la ciudadanía 6) confirming an earlier decision that was contested.

Case Overview and Proposal

• The case involves allegations against the Executive Directorate of the National Electoral Professional Service regarding workplace harassment claims within the Baja California Electoral Institute.

• Prior to admission, the plaintiff indicated a desire to withdraw their complaint but did not formally confirm this within the allotted time frame.

Final Decisions and Session Closure

• The court decides to consider the demand as not presented due to lack of formal confirmation from the plaintiff.

• The secretary confirms there are no further matters on the agenda for this session.

• Magistrate Sergio welcomes students attending with Professor Juan Carlos, emphasizing transparency and openness in electoral matters before officially closing the session.