He Gets UFOs To Show Up 100% Of The Time

UAP Classifications Overview

Class 1: Tetra

• The Tetra class is characterized by its use of multiband imagery, including electro-optical sensors that can see beyond the human visible spectrum.

• It is detected using middlewave infrared and shortwave infrared sensors, as well as radar systems.

• Typically observed flying in groups ranging from three to twenty, often in formations resembling flocks of birds or military aircraft.

• These UAPs exhibit flight paths that deviate from initial observations, allowing for detailed telemetry data collection on altitude and speed.

Class 2: Tic Tac

• The Tic Tac class measures about 40 feet in length and has been observed in groups of one to three but does not typically fly in formation.

• Notable behavior includes utilizing terrain for concealment from primary sensors, demonstrating advanced evasion tactics.

• Radar data indicates unusual activity; however, there are challenges in tracking them consistently with existing technology.

• Visual characteristics reveal a non-cylindrical shape with spikes around its perimeter, suggesting a more complex structure than previously thought.

Class 3: Blop

• The Blop class appears as a Pepto-Bismol colored cloud with a central filament resembling a flame or cylinder.

• This object maintains a stable trajectory while exhibiting rapid vertical and horizontal vibrations during flight.

• Its movement pattern is likened to that of the Tasmanian devil bouncing through a subway tunnel, indicating erratic yet controlled motion.

UAP Classifications and Observations

Class 3 UAP Characteristics

• The Class 3 UAP exhibits rapid, point-to-point movement within a confined area, despite appearing erratic in its trajectory.

• This class meets several characteristics of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), including instantaneous movement without visible propulsion or contrails.

• There is speculation about whether these phenomena could be holographic projections or government manipulations using space-based lasers to create illusions.

• The discussion raises questions about the physical existence of these objects versus potential technological deceptions by the government.

Class 4 Observations

• Class 4 UAP, described as orbs, were observed during specific government activities that cannot be disclosed publicly.

• These orbs have only been detected in infrared wavelengths and not on radar; their behavior includes moving against wind currents and remaining stationary for extended periods.

• Two orbs were noted flying together for approximately three and a half hours, challenging explanations based on celestial bodies or known technology.

Class 5 Insights

• The Class 5 UAP resembles a manta ray and has been observed emitting plasma-like substances while displaying unusual flight behaviors such as disappearing from view.

• It has been seen only a few times but is documented across various imaging bands; however, it lacks significant radar signatures.

Class 6 Characteristics

• The Class 6 UAP is referred to as the "bright star," which vibrates significantly and interferes with equipment used for observation.

• This interference suggests some form of signature management that complicates accurate data collection regarding its nature.

Class 6 and Class 7 UAPs: Insights from Observations

Characteristics of Class 6 UAPs

• The Class 6 UAP exhibits signature management, making it difficult to track. This suggests a possible human-like technology but remains uncertain.

• It vibrates at high frequencies, creating an optical illusion of multiple units when viewed under camera due to its rapid oscillation.

• The craft changes brightness as it vibrates, similar to the behavior observed in Class 3 blobs, indicating energy fluctuations during movement.

• The oscillation cycle appears to be a repetitive process where the craft returns to its original state after exhausting its energy.

Interactions with Class 7 UAPs

• An attempt was made to intercept a Tic Tac using HILO; however, radar jamming by Class 7 jellyfish led to failure.

• During interactions with Class 7 UAPs, helicopters experienced immobilization despite operational engines and blades.

• Video evidence shows that while pursuing Class 7 jellyfish, they consistently evaded capture by altering their flight paths unexpectedly.

Notable Encounter with Class 7

• Over four days, repeated observations were made of the class 7 flying through radar beams and approaching the team closely on the fourth day.

• For about five minutes, a class 7 hovered approximately 800 meters above the team but moved away as attempts were made to document it visually.

Technical Challenges and Sensor Issues

• The presence of class 7 is believed to emit microwave energy that disrupts sensor connections between systems during encounters.

• Primary sensors failed to collect data while the class 7 was hovering; functionality resumed only after its departure from the area.

Lessons Learned from Encounters

• Despite having advanced camera equipment available for documentation, critical errors occurred (e.g., missing SD cards), highlighting preparation gaps for secondary systems becoming primary in urgent situations.

• Daily interactions with class 7 became increasingly intriguing as their behavior suggested probing of active systems within airspace.

Jellyfish-like Objects and Debunking Theories

Observations of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena

• The speaker describes observing jellyfish-like objects flying in pairs, showing interest in their position relative to the observers.

• The jellyfish observed are approximately 2 to 3 meters across with tentacles about 5 meters long, differing from those previously revealed by Jeremy Corbel.

Characteristics of the Jellyfish-like Objects

• The movement of the tentacles appears more dynamic compared to previous thermal imaging footage, suggesting a different behavior or design.

• The speaker critiques the concept of "debunking," arguing it often assumes malintent and lacks thorough analysis of claims made regarding these phenomena.

Analysis of Movement Patterns

• An analogy is drawn between a balloon's string in wind and the observed objects' tentacle movements, indicating how air pressure affects their shape during flight.

• When comparing helicopter operations with payload release, it's noted that the line can form a U-shape when flying into wind, hinting at complex aerodynamic behaviors.

Implications for Understanding Aerial Phenomena

• Observations show that sometimes the tentacles take on a Pac-Man shape while moving against or faster than the wind, challenging conventional interpretations.

• If these objects are balloons, they may represent a hybrid type capable of unique maneuvers not typical for standard balloons.

Encounter with Class 7 Objects

• During an encounter with Class 7 objects, instrumentation began to malfunction as they approached an area where altitude changes were requested.

• There is speculation about whether these entities are aware of human presence due to their evasive actions when helicopters approach.

UAP Predictions and Interactions

Anticipation of UAP Activity

• The speaker reflects on the uncertainty surrounding potential aggressive actions from unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) during a five-day observation period. They ponder various possibilities, including direct attacks or communication attempts.

A Prophetic Encounter

• On the fifth day, Jordan, a team lead, predicts an upcoming conflict in the sky involving different UAPs. This prediction is later confirmed as accurate, leading to a request for documented evidence of such predictions in future instances.

Unusual System Interference

• The team experiences unprecedented interference with their systems coinciding with sightings of jellyfish-like UAPs. Unlike previous mild disruptions, this interference lasts for two hours and prevents them from using primary sensors effectively.

Discovery of Class 2 UAPs

• During the period of interference, the team discovers class 2 tic tac and manta ray-shaped UAPs hiding behind terrain features while attempting to understand the cause of system failures. This highlights their elusive nature and ability to remain undetected under certain conditions.

Historical Context of UAP Reactions

• The speaker recounts a past event where an energy weapon was aimed at a UAP during an experiment; before they could activate it, their systems were disabled by what appeared to be a defensive response from the UAP. This raises questions about whether these entities can anticipate human actions.

Ethics and Intentions in UAP Research

Non-Aggressive Approach

• The Skywatcher team emphasizes that they do not engage in aggressive tactics against UAP or attempt to provoke conflict with any national entities or extraterrestrial beings; their focus remains on peaceful observation and understanding rather than confrontation.

Desire for Peaceful Interaction

• Their goal is to encourage one of these phenomena to land peacefully so they can observe and collect data without causing harm or destruction—highlighting a scientific approach rather than militaristic intentions.

Classifications of UAP Observed

Insights into Class 8 Hornet

• The speaker mentions having only seen class 8 hornets a few times, indicating their rarity compared to other classes like class 5 which are more frequently observed but still elusive in nature. They share personal experiences related to chasing these entities without significant changes in flight paths noted during encounters.

Exploring the Class 9 UAP: Hopes and Challenges

Slow Progress in Observation

• The team struggled to visualize the Class 9 object, moving at a slow speed of only 20 knots while attempting to align their orbits for better observation.

• The Class 9 is referred to as "the egg," sparking curiosity about its potential and implications for future research.

Future Expectations and Timelines

• There is hope for a demonstration involving the Class 9 object within the first half of 2025, aiming to invite key public members and possibly achieve a landing.

• Questions arise regarding whether they can successfully land the egg, with comparisons made to Elon Musk's ambitious timelines.

Uncertainty Surrounding Retrieval

• The speaker expresses uncertainty about whether the egg is a real craft and questions if it can be controlled or commanded to land.

• Historical context suggests that successful retrieval of such objects has never been documented publicly, raising skepticism about claims made by others.

Material Possibilities from UAPs

• There is an open-mindedness towards retrieving actual materials from various crafts, with speculation on their physical properties and technology.

• Some crafts may not even be physical entities; possibilities include holograms or plasmoids that could transform upon landing.

Observations of UAP Behavior

• The speaker recounts witnessing three class one UAP crashes during special government operations in 2023, noting unusual behavior patterns among them.

• A significant observation involved around 200 UAP sorties coming directly from space rather than just flying through airspace, indicating unique ingress patterns.

Search Efforts Post-Sightings

• After observing unusual UAP behavior, efforts were made to locate any crash sites but yielded no results due to challenging terrain conditions.

• Despite extensive searches following sightings of class eight objects in January, there remains uncertainty about what exactly they are looking for.