Tutorial plataforma Rizoma SNII 2025

Introduction to the Session

Welcome and Overview

• The session begins with a lively introduction, welcoming viewers from various locations.

• The host encourages audience interaction by asking where participants are joining from, creating an engaging atmosphere.

• Acknowledgment of the diverse audience, including participants from Colima, Morelia, Tabasco, and other regions in Mexico.

Understanding Rizoma

Key Concepts and Structure

• The main topic of discussion is "rizoma," with a promise to cover it comprehensively from start to finish.

• The host requests patience as they navigate through the details of rizoma while addressing questions along the way.

Navigating the Platform

Accessing Rizoma

• Viewers are informed that the session will be recorded and available on YouTube for later reference.

• Mention of previous sessions regarding evaluation criteria and how they have been segmented into four concise videos for easier access.

Logging In and User Information

Initial Steps

• Instructions on logging into the platform (rizoma.conac.mx), noting that users may need an alternative email if they've been inactive for a while.

• Emphasis on completing all necessary information before exploring or submitting any modifications within the platform.

Completing Your Profile

Important Considerations

• Users should save their work but refrain from submitting until everything is complete; this includes filling out text boxes accurately.

• Recommendations to draft responses in Word first to avoid character limit issues when copying over to rizoma.

Academic Credentials Submission

Document Requirements

• Discussion about entering academic qualifications such as degrees (licenciatura, maestría, doctorado), highlighting evidence submission requirements.

• Clarification that both title and professional license must be submitted together in one PDF file if needed for verification purposes.

Final Notes on Academic Records

Ensuring Compliance

• Importance of having official documents ready: titles or licenses are mandatory; provisional certificates are not accepted.

Search Functionality in Academic Institutions

Initial Search Setup

• The discussion begins with the need to search for institutions, emphasizing the importance of selecting the correct nature of the institution for effective results.

• A specific example is given regarding public state institutions, particularly referencing Chihuahua as a case study.

Searching by Country and Institution

• The speaker highlights that when searching for foreign institutions, users should be aware that country names are listed in English; Spain is used as an example.

• The process of refining searches using specific city names like "Madrid" is demonstrated, ensuring all relevant institutions appear correctly.

Document Submission Process

• Instructions are provided on how to upload documents related to academic qualifications, including selecting files from a computer.

• The importance of medical certifications and recertifications is discussed, noting that while some courses may not be essential, others hold significant value in evaluations.

Achievements and Recognitions

• Various types of achievements such as awards and distinctions are mentioned. Examples include university re-categorizations and editorial recognitions.

• Specific examples of achievements like being an invited editor or receiving awards from publishing platforms are shared to illustrate potential entries.

Institutional Registration Challenges

• The speaker addresses issues with registering new institutions or companies if they do not appear in the system.

• Guidance is provided on how to submit requests for adding new institutions via email, detailing necessary information such as name and address.

Conclusion on Institutional Searches

• A summary of steps for submitting institutional data emphasizes clarity in descriptions to ensure proper understanding.

Verification of Academic Documents and Language Proficiency

Document Verification Process

• The process involves verifying documents such as official letterhead, RFC identification, and diploma titles from institutions. Participants are instructed to attach evidence in their emails.

• It is noted that some universities have challenging requirements for language certifications; for instance, Spanish may not require certification due to being a native language.

• Participants must provide details about their language proficiency levels, including certifications and the validity period of these documents.

Employment and Professional Trajectory

• The discussion shifts to professional trajectory, emphasizing the importance of current employment details for participants in the accreditation process.

• Participants are advised to download an accreditation format from their institution, which needs to be signed and stamped by the responsible authority before submission.

Achievements and Contributions

• When adding employment information, participants can include achievements but it is not mandatory. This section allows for showcasing significant contributions.

• There are updates regarding humanistic and scientific production records; changes may occur in registration fields during platform migrations.

Document Submission Guidelines

• It's crucial to pay attention to document submission limits; participants can upload up to 60 supporting documents related to publications or productions.

• A distinction is made between different types of publications (articles, chapters, books), with a limit on how many can be highlighted at once.

Selection Criteria for Highlighted Works

• Participants are encouraged to critically evaluate their own work when selecting highlighted products based on various factors like recency or collaboration with students.

• Emphasis is placed on choosing high-quality publications from reputable journals or those that demonstrate support for student research efforts.

Navigating Institutional Searches

• Technical issues arise during screen sharing; however, it's important for participants to navigate back through previous sections effectively.

• When searching for institutions by country (e.g., Norway), users should ensure they select the correct type (national vs. foreign).

How to Properly Register Academic Publications

Steps for Completing Publication Records

• The speaker emphasizes the importance of including specific details in publication records, such as the year, name of the award or distinction, country, and institution.

• When editing incomplete records, it is crucial to identify missing information. Mandatory fields are marked with an asterisk; in this case, the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) was missing.

• If a journal does not have a DOI listed, one must provide the URL instead. The speaker notes that some journals may not use URLs effectively due to their length.

Managing Article Registrations

• The speaker suggests maintaining a file containing all publications and a curriculum vitae for easy reference when asked about publication counts.

• A practical example is given where the speaker quickly retrieves publication data for 2024 by filtering through their records.

Importance of ISSN and DOI

• The necessity of registering both printed and electronic ISSNs (International Standard Serial Numbers) is highlighted. This registration is important for various academic evaluations and funding applications.

• The process involves searching online databases to find ISSNs associated with journals. It’s advised to copy journal names accurately when searching.

Utilizing Online Resources

• The speaker discusses using specific websites that provide comprehensive data about journals, including indexing information which can be beneficial for researchers.

• When entering ISSNs into forms, it's essential to follow formatting rules regarding hyphens; typically they consist of eight digits split by a hyphen.

Finalizing Publication Details

• After gathering necessary identifiers like DOIs and ISSNs, these should be formatted as hyperlinks for ease of access in future references.

• While filling out publication status forms, only published works are considered valid; accepted but unpublished works may not count towards evaluations.

Citation Management

• Selecting citation sources carefully is crucial; Google Scholar often reports citations but can sometimes overcount or misattribute them.

• Caution is advised when relying on Google Scholar due to potential discrepancies in citation counts; users should verify citations thoroughly before submission.

Citation Management and Author Registration Process

Understanding Citation Types

• The speaker discusses the importance of citations in academic work, emphasizing that even without formal citations, one can still register their work by copying the URL from the browser.

• When evaluating works, having at least one citation is crucial; if not available, a placeholder can be used until formal citations are obtained.

• The speaker highlights the necessity of marking zero for missing citations to validate total counts, which previously required manual entry but now appears automatically.

Differentiating Between Citation Types A and B

• Citations are categorized into two types: Type A and Type B. Type A refers to citations made by authors who are not co-authors of the original publication.

• Type B citations occur when a co-author cites another co-author's work; self-citations (where an author cites their own work) are not reported as Type B.

Author Registration Process

• The speaker explains how to register oneself as an author in a publication system, including finding one's ORCID ID, which consists of 16 characters divided into segments.

• It’s important for authors to list themselves correctly in order based on their contribution to the article; this includes identifying primary authorship roles.

Selecting Research Profiles

• Depending on research focus—basic research or social impact—the appropriate profile must be selected during registration. This affects how contributions are categorized within institutional frameworks.

• For those working with students or thesis writers, it’s essential to credit them as primary authors when applicable while also maintaining proper acknowledgment for oneself.

DOI Generation and Article Status

• Questions arise regarding DOI generation for articles; it is clarified that this process is managed by publishing institutions through subscriptions with CrossRef.

Evaluation Criteria for Research Publications

Importance of DOI in Publication

• The evaluation criteria emphasize the significance of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) for research publications. If a publication has a DOI, it should be copied and pasted; if not, the standard URL is acceptable.

Impact Factor Considerations

• The discussion highlights that while impact factors are important, they are not mandatory for submission. Authors should upload their articles without needing to provide an indexed impact factor or quartile information. Instead, they can refer to the journal's website for this data.

Author Roles and Responsibilities

• Clarification on author roles indicates that only specific titles like "corresponding author" or "principal author" matter in publications. Other roles such as co-author or coordinator may not hold significant weight in evaluations. Attention is drawn to ensure proper designation of authorship roles during submissions.

ISBN and Book Registration Process

• When registering books, it's crucial to include an ISBN (International Standard Book Number), which can be either 10 or 13 characters long. This number must be accurately recorded to avoid issues with publication tracking and citation management.

Handling Multiple Authors in Publications

Registration of Conference Proceedings and Book Chapters

Importance of ISBN in Chapter Registration

• The registration of conference proceedings as book chapters is not standard; however, some major publishers like Springer do peer-review their proceedings, allowing them to be registered with an ISBN.

Role of Forewords in Academic Publishing

• Writing a foreword for a colleague's book chapter can demonstrate leadership qualities, both nationally and internationally, which are important metrics in academic circles.

Process of Registering New Chapters

• When registering a new chapter, it’s essential to include details such as the chapter number and author information. The speaker notes that they need to ensure all required fields are filled out correctly.

ISBN Verification for Publications

• The speaker emphasizes the necessity of obtaining the ISBN from the main page of the publication when registering chapters. This ensures proper identification and cataloging.

Challenges with Chapter Numbering in Encyclopedias

• There is frustration expressed regarding the requirement to provide specific chapter numbers in encyclopedias, highlighting inconsistencies across different publications.

Citation Tracking and Evidence Submission

Importance of Citing Sources Correctly

• The speaker discusses tracking citations for their work, noting that having evidence such as URLs for citations is crucial when submitting research or publications.

Co-authorship and Publication Status

• It’s mentioned that even if a chapter has been published without formal peer review documentation, it can still be submitted as proof during registration processes.

Peer Review Process Insights

Understanding Peer Review Requirements

• The discussion touches on the importance of having evidence for peer review processes when submitting works for publication. This includes understanding what constitutes valid documentation.

Digital vs. Print Publications Impact on Citations

• There is an emphasis on publishing works digitally due to its advantages in citation practices compared to solely print publications.

Technological Development Documentation

Steps for Documenting Technological Innovations

• When documenting technological developments or innovations, it's necessary to provide detailed descriptions including objectives and problems addressed by the product being developed.

Classification Systems in Industrial Sectors

• The classification systems used (like those from OECD or NAICS) are critical when categorizing industrial sectors related to technological developments.

Intellectual Property Considerations

Types of Intellectual Property Protection

Transferencia Tecnológica y Evaluaciones Académicas

Proceso de Transferencia Tecnológica

• Se discute la importancia de incluir actividades relacionadas con la transferencia tecnológica, como asociaciones estratégicas, consultorías y creación de empresas (spinoffs o startups).

• Es esencial describir las actividades realizadas durante el proceso de transferencia, incluyendo fechas y resultados principales.

• El desarrollo de tecnologías innovadoras debe ser un rol prioritario en la producción tecnológica para lograr una transformación social efectiva.

Evaluaciones Académicas

• Se mencionan diferentes tipos de evaluaciones académicas que se pueden registrar, como revisiones curriculares y arbitrajes de manuscritos.

• La importancia del registro detallado en cada revista evaluada es fundamental para mantener un seguimiento claro del trabajo realizado.

Tipos de Evaluaciones Realizadas

• Se enumeran diversas evaluaciones que incluyen propuestas para congresos, tesis y solicitudes de renovación, destacando su relevancia en el ámbito académico.

• Las evaluaciones son cruciales aunque no siempre se permite adjuntar evidencia; sin embargo, se puede aprovechar el desarrollo institucional para documentar estas actividades.

Registro Detallado

• Es importante detallar los productos evaluados y los tipos de evaluación realizados, abarcando desde artículos hasta programas académicos.

• Los registros deben incluir información sobre el tipo específico de evaluación realizada y su impacto en el contexto académico.

Diferenciación entre Roles

• Se clarifica la diferencia entre ser Jurado examinador y miembro del comité tutorial; cada rol tiene funciones distintas dentro del proceso educativo.

Evaluation Types and Academic Documentation

Overview of Evaluation Types

• The discussion begins with the distinction between two types of evaluations: tutorial committee and examining jury, highlighting their different roles in academic assessments.

• Emphasis is placed on the importance of documenting academic stays, including details such as institution name, start and end dates, and type of academic stay (e.g., postdoctoral or sabbatical).

Community Formation and Teaching Contributions

• The speaker stresses the significance of community formation during academic stays, particularly through teaching contributions. It’s crucial to document courses taught, specifying whether they are part of a semester or trimester program.

• Participants are encouraged to highlight significant achievements like thesis supervision or diploma courses while ensuring that all relevant documentation is submitted.

Course Registration Strategies

• A recommendation is made to avoid confusion by registering courses taught with specific semester identifiers (e.g., August-December 2023), which helps track repeated subjects over time.

• The speaker suggests using parentheses for semesters when naming courses to prevent duplicate entries and maintain clarity in records.

Institutional Requirements for Course Documentation

• When registering courses, it’s essential to identify if they belong to the National Postgraduate System (SNP). This affects how programs are categorized within institutions.

• Detailed instructions are provided on how to register each course individually, including total hours per semester and evidence requirements for course completion.

Importance of Comprehensive Record-Keeping

• The necessity for thorough documentation across various educational levels (doctorate, specialty, etc.) is emphasized. Candidates may enter at different levels based on their teaching experience.

• The process involves selecting appropriate institutions from a directory that aligns with SNP programs while ensuring accurate course registration details.

Managing Teaching Records Effectively

• Recommendations include maintaining a clear record of previously taught subjects over multiple years to manage growing documentation effectively.

• It’s advised that educators keep track of their teaching history meticulously; this includes noting down every instance a subject was taught across different groups.

Highlighting Thesis Supervision

• Special attention is given to thesis supervision as a critical component in evaluating teaching contributions. All relevant theses should be documented regardless of age but prioritize recent works.

• For thesis work directed or co-directed by faculty members, it's recommended to submit official documents like professional examination records as proof.

Transcript Summary Academic Work Registration Process

Overview of Thesis and Supervision Documentation

• The speaker discusses the importance of protecting personal data in academic documentation, specifically regarding student information and thesis supervision records.

• Emphasizes the need to highlight the number of theses directed or co-directed, aiming for recognition in academic contributions.

• Mentions that only theses directed by the speaker will be registered, while other advisory roles are documented separately under institutional development.

Thesis Status and Institutional Development Contributions

• Discusses how to categorize thesis work based on their status (in process, completed, or incomplete), suggesting that even ongoing projects should be recorded as they reflect sustained effort.

• Details required information for each thesis entry including approval dates and author details, emphasizing clarity in roles such as director or co-director.

Institutional Development Activities

• Explains how to register various types of academic work beyond theses, including advisory roles and participation in institutional development activities.

• Defines two categories of institutional development: participation in research projects and involvement in creating academic programs.

Evidence Submission for Evaluations

• Suggests reiterating evaluation participation within institutional development submissions to enhance credibility; mentions summarizing evaluations conducted for journals.

• Advises using a single PDF file to compile multiple evidences into one document for submission purposes.

Academic Profiles and Participation Roles

• Discusses aligning submitted works with specific academic profiles related to research impact areas like basic science or national issues.

• Clarifies that all prior works before 2020 are marked differently due to evaluation periods not being applicable anymore.

Additional Contributions Beyond Theses

• Considers whether medical specialty theses should count similarly to doctoral theses; suggests logical equivalence despite lack of formal guidelines.

• Highlights various roles such as editorial positions or committee memberships that can also contribute towards institutional development documentation.

Institutional Development and Knowledge Dissemination

Institutional Engagement and Curriculum Design

• Discussion on the importance of linking with institutions and organizations for academic commissions, participation in programs, and curriculum design or updates.

• Emphasis on documenting achievements without evidence, suggesting a need to reiterate this in institutional development discussions.

Scientific Production vs. Knowledge Dissemination

• Clarification that scientific production is aimed at peers within specific fields, while dissemination targets broader social groups beyond academia.

• Example provided comparing high-impact journals (e.g., PLOS ONE, Nature) as venues for scientific production versus popular science magazines for knowledge dissemination.

Registration of Activities and Publications

• Importance of registering various types of publications under universal access to knowledge; both are vital but differ in purpose.

• Mention of attaching proof documents when registering activities; limitations noted regarding the number of attachments allowed.

Types of Events and Participation

• Overview of different types of participatory events such as conferences, workshops, and public presentations that can be registered.

• Discussion on how editorial contributions should be categorized to avoid inflating publication counts artificially.

Target Audience and Media Type

• Identification of target audiences (general public, students, etc.) for various outreach activities; importance placed on specifying the type of media used (internet, print).

• Suggestions for categorizing events based on their audience reach—international versus national—and the nature of the medium utilized.

Evidence Collection and Reporting Outcomes

• Recommendations for collecting evidence related to outreach activities through links or references to online content showcasing these efforts.

Research Participation and Documentation

Overview of Research Activities

• Discussion on the importance of research groups and networks, emphasizing that outreach activities should align with these objectives.

• Clarification regarding intellectual property rights, noting that production does not equate to ownership; examples include photo exhibitions and YouTube channels as platforms for dissemination.

Contributions to Literature and Events

• Mention of participation in a book fair workshop aimed at promoting reading and research through libraries, highlighting the role of podcasts in sharing work.

• Instructions on documenting conference participation, including types such as keynote speeches, moderators, or panel participants.

Documenting Conference Engagement

• Emphasis on compiling proof of participation in conferences into a single document for easier submission.

• Guidance on categorizing contributions like conference proceedings or summaries under outreach efforts rather than formal evaluation products.

Submitting Evidence and Peer Reviews

• Explanation of how to manage file submissions when registering past documents; includes steps for replacing files if necessary.

• Notes on peer reviews related to teaching courses at various academic levels, indicating where these contributions should be recorded.

Distinguishing Between Event Types

• Differentiation between congresses, seminars, symposia, etc., stressing that events aimed at university students should be categorized under outreach.

• Commentary on the equivalence of specialty theses to doctoral theses within health research contexts.

Final Considerations for Submission

• Description of how institutional development allows only one submission per activity with free-form descriptions required for detailing activities undertaken.

• Inquiry about specific project involvement within national information ecosystems; highlights the need for clarity in documentation requirements.

Reporting Citations Effectively

• Instructions regarding citation reporting via URLs from academic databases; emphasizes ensuring public access to documents stored online for evaluators' review.

Considerations for Academic Advancement

Overview of Application Criteria

• The application process is influenced by two main factors: academic activities and professional trajectory, as well as social impact activities.

• Candidates should articulate their aspirations clearly, referencing specific criteria from the regulations to justify their desired level of advancement.

• It’s important to provide evidence of citations and publications, including the number of indexed articles and participation in editorial committees.

Detailing Professional Achievements

• Candidates should highlight their publication history, specifying roles such as first or sole author across various types of works (articles, chapters, books).

• Participation in academic events like congresses and any awards received should be documented to strengthen the application.

• Activities that address social issues or promote scientific vocations can enhance a candidate's profile; involvement in national strategic programs (PRONACES) is particularly relevant.

Addressing Specific Queries

• When applying for Level 1 in institutional development, candidates are encouraged to present a comprehensive overview of their entire career rather than just recent achievements.

• It's crucial to start with historical contributions before detailing actions taken since becoming a candidate for promotion.

Technical Aspects of Submission

• Recordings of sessions are available on YouTube for reference; candidates can access them via provided links.

• Google Scholar allows manual addition of articles; however, automatic updates may take time and could affect citation counts.

Clarifications on Documentation Requirements

• For anthropologists, fieldwork stays should be included under appropriate categories; acceptance emails serve as valid documentation for published chapters.

• Each section has limits on submissions; while many items can be registered, only a select few can be highlighted as evidence.

Regulations and Criteria for Recognition

Overview of Legal Framework

• Discussion on the legal framework regarding recognition regulations, specifically referencing regulation 65.

• Clarification that individuals aged 65 who have been in service for at least 15 years may request an extension.

Contacting Authorities

• Suggestion to contact the secretariat regarding specific initiatives, particularly those related to age criteria for applications.

• Emphasis on the importance of including personal considerations in applications to provide a more human perspective beyond just numerical data.

Application Considerations

• Importance of detailing significant achievements in one's career when applying for recognition.

• Mention of issues faced by individuals not meeting age requirements and recommendations to consult with the secretariat for clarity.

Documentation Requirements

Submission Guidelines

• Recommendations on what documents should accompany articles and chapters submitted as proof, including title pages and ISBN details.

• Distinction made between reviewing thesis work and participating in professional examinations; these are considered separate activities.

Thesis Supervision Documentation

• Suggested documentation includes signed letters from authorities confirming supervision of theses along with examination records compiled into a single PDF format.

Highlighting Achievements

Notable Contributions

• Discussion on how to highlight significant contributions across various sectors such as teaching, community formation, and universal access to knowledge.

Clarifications on Tesis Probationary Documents

• Indications given by the secretariat regarding necessary documentation for thesis proofs during retirement processes.

Professional Development Insights

Navigating Institutional Processes

• Advice provided about potential delays in retirement processes due to institutional guidelines; recommended discussions with university authorities.

Methodological Guidance

• Inquiry about where methodological advising credits would be recorded within thesis submissions; emphasis placed on ensuring proper accreditation through institutional participation.

Publication Types and Status

Understanding Publication Categories

• Explanation distinguishing between scientific publications versus diffusion publications, highlighting their relevance across different sectors.

Candidate vs. Level One Registration

• Clarification that if one has previously held candidate status, they must aim for level one unless they meet specific criteria allowing them to apply again as a candidate.

Final Remarks and Engagement Encouragement

Closing Thoughts

Scientific Communication and Humor

Overview of the Channel's Purpose

• The speaker shares insights about their research and presentations, which are recorded and uploaded to the channel.

• The focus is on scientific production, information dissemination, and research with a blend of humor, technology, and pop culture.

• The speaker identifies themselves as Juan, a scientist dedicated to making science accessible.

Engagement with the Audience

• Viewers are encouraged to ask questions; a Q&A session is scheduled for the following Saturday.

• The video is part of a broader project aimed at promoting scientific communication through engaging content.