The MASSIVE Corruption of The Supreme Court | Exposed [Clarance Thomas Details]

The MASSIVE Corruption of The Supreme Court | Exposed [Clarance Thomas Details]

Supreme Court Justice Allegedly Involved in Ethics Violations

In this video, the speaker discusses a ProPublica article alleging that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has been involved in ethics violations and potentially influenced by Republican donors.

Allegations of Ethics Violations

  • ProPublica published an article alleging that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has committed ethics violations.
  • The allegations include receiving luxury vacations from billionaire and Republican donor Harlan Crowe, political donations to Thomas's spouse, and potentially being influenced by Crowe to shift the court to the right.
  • The lifetime tenure of Supreme Court Justices is supposed to enable them to be politically neutral, but these allegations suggest otherwise.

Details on Harlan Crowe

  • Harlan Crowe is a real estate mogul whose father was once deemed the largest landlord in the country.
  • He owns a privately held company called The Crow Company with around $18 billion in assets.
  • The speaker notes their own background in real estate before continuing with the discussion.

Luxury Vacations and Private Jet Trips

  • Clarence Thomas allegedly received luxury vacations from Harlan Crowe for over 20 years, including island hopping on a super yacht in Indonesia.
  • Thomas also allegedly used Crowe's private jet for trips such as a three-hour trip from Dallas to New Haven. While some numbers may be inflated due to using charter prices instead of normal prices, owning a jet is still much cheaper than chartering one.

Conclusion

  • While this video is not designed to be political or left versus right, the allegations against Clarence Thomas are concerning given his position as a Supreme Court Justice.

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas Accused of Ethics Violations

This transcript discusses the accusations of ethics violations against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

Accusations of Unethical Behavior

  • Republican Mega donor potentially has a Supreme Court Justice in their back pocket.
  • Thomas has gone on lavish vacations and retreats, including all-male retreats at The Bohemian Grove, ranches in Texas and Indonesia, and Hawaii.
  • Ethics law attorneys say any donation over $50 requires disclosure, but Thomas argues that he never asked for any of it and therefore doesn't have to disclose it.
  • Experts say that private jet flights and other gifts from his friend Harlan Crow violate ethics laws.
  • There is a chance that if this continues to get media attention, Thomas could be forced into retirement.

Arguments for Ethical Behavior

  • Other judges retired judges make reservations without using their title to avoid being unjustly enriched.
  • Some argue that disclosing gifts would be the best opportunity. However, Thomas argues that if he discloses gifts he didn't ask for then people will think he's biased.

Lavish Gifts Received by Clarence Thomas

  • Crow lavished the justice with gifts including a $19,000 Bible belonging to Frederick Douglass and a portrait of him and his wife.
  • The Crow Foundation gave $105,000 to Yale Law School where Thomas went to school.
  • Other trips included motorboats and a giant inflatable rubber duck.

Friendship with Harlan Crow

  • Crow met Thomas after he became a justice. They have become genuine friends and go to men's clubs together.

Conclusion

The accusations of unethical behavior against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas include accepting lavish gifts from a Republican Mega donor, violating ethics laws by not disclosing private jet flights and other gifts, and potentially being forced into retirement if the media attention continues. Thomas argues that he never asked for any of the gifts and therefore doesn't have to disclose them, but experts say that these gifts violate ethics laws.

Tea Party Group Funded by Supreme Court Justice's Wife

The section discusses how a Republican donor, Crow, gave half a million dollars to a tea party group founded by the wife of Supreme Court Justice Thomas. The group paid her $120,000 salary and funded lavish vacations without any disclosure.

Funding of Tea Party Group

  • Crow gave half a million dollars to a tea party group founded by Jenny Thomas.
  • The group paid Jenny Thomas $120,000 salary.
  • Lavish vacations were funded without any disclosure.

Supreme Court Justice's Wife Backing Trump's Election Fraud Claims

This section discusses how the wife of Supreme Court Justice Thomas was backing Trump's election fraud claims.

Backing Trump's Election Fraud Claims

  • Jenny Thomas was a prominent backer of Trump's lies that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him.
  • She alleged that Americans don't swallow up obvious fraud and talked about the whole coup.

Clarence Thomas' Corruption

This section discusses Clarence Thomas' corruption in detail.

Corruption Details

  • Clarence Thomas has been ruling on cases directly involving the real estate industry while being funded by Crow who is involved in real estate.
  • Crow helped finance a documentary about Clarence Thomas where he said he prefers Walmart parking lots over beaches and things like that.
  • During one trip in July 2017, fellow guests included executives at Verizon and PricewaterhouseCoopers (auditor), both major Republican donors and leaders of American Enterprise Institute (pro-business conservative think tank).
  • A painting of Thomas at Top Ridge shows him in conversation with Leonardo Leo, the Federalist Society leader regarded as an architect of the Supreme Court's recent turn to the right.

Clarence Thomas' Gatherings

This section discusses Clarence Thomas' gatherings and how they are just gatherings of friends.

Gatherings

  • The argument is that these are just gatherings of friends.

Potential Corruption of the Supreme Court

In this section, the speaker discusses the potential for corruption in the Supreme Court due to wealthy individuals inviting justices on trips and vacations.

Originalism and Conservative Judges

  • The speaker explains that originalism is a conservative judicial philosophy that interprets the Constitution without new adaptations or versions.
  • Justice Thomas is a conservative judge who leans further to the right. He has a strong belief in originalism.
  • The speaker gives examples of cases where originalism was used, such as DC vs Heller in 2008 and US first Bond in 2014.

Is It Reasonable for a Judge?

  • The speaker questions whether it is reasonable for a judge to accept gifts from wealthy individuals, potentially leading to bias and corruption.
  • The answer is yes, likely. This could be considered corruption of the Supreme Court.

Private Jet Trips vs Walmart Parking Lots

In this section, the speaker discusses a poll conducted during a course member livestream about private jet trips versus Walmart parking lots.

Poll Results

  • The poll results showed that 66 out of 306 voters preferred private jet trips over Walmart parking lots.
  • The speaker jokes about Walmart parking lots being dangerous due to people attacking with shopping carts.
  • They mention using Walmart Plus for safer shopping experiences.

Elite Hustlers Course

  • The speaker briefly mentions their exclusive course called Elite Hustlers.

Walmart Plus and the Wild West

In this section, the speaker talks about Walmart Plus and how it can save time and prevent impulse purchases. They also mention their positive experiences with Walmart in the past.

Benefits of Walmart Plus

  • Walmart Plus is a great option for getting items delivered.
  • It saves time and prevents impulse purchases that may happen in-store.
  • The service is included in the price, with only a small tip required.

Positive Experiences with Walmart

  • The speaker has had positive experiences with Walmart over the years.
  • They recall finding fans at a Walmart Supercenter when they needed them.
  • However, they express disappointment at the removal of garden centers from many Walmarts and Targets.

Judicial Corruption?

  • The speaker makes an abrupt transition to mentioning "judicial corruption," but no further information or context is provided.