VIDEO
HIGHLIGHT
Log InSign up
Prácticas de servicio comunitario
SummaryTranscriptChat

Prácticas de servicio comunitario

Methodological Activity Overview

Introduction and Context

  • The speaker greets the audience, expressing pleasure in addressing them again. They mention that there are no formal classes today due to a methodological activity at the university.
  • The decision to hold practical sessions is made to avoid losing a week of progress, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the initial plan.

Upcoming Activities

  • The speaker outlines that both this week and next will focus on similar activities, including formulating questions for an upcoming project.
  • Acknowledgment of issues faced during the previous week's transition regarding course changes and how it affected question structuring.

Challenges with Course Changes

Issues Encountered

  • Discussion about confusion arising from changes in course materials; specifically, groups were reassigned from fourth-grade language and literature to third-grade education.
  • Clarification that certain questions (16 to 20) were left unaddressed by their group due to these changes.

Feedback and Confusion

  • The speaker expresses frustration over unclear feedback received regarding whether correct answers should be included in the same document as questions.
  • Emphasis on needing clarity about whether retroactive feedback should accompany each question or if only questions are required.

Expectations Moving Forward

Document Structure Requirements

  • Reiteration that all documents must include questions, correct answers, and feedback as part of their structure.
  • Assurance given that minor errors can be overlooked but significant deviations will require resubmission of work.

Group Responsibilities

  • Acknowledgment of increased workload for reviewing submissions once all tasks are completed; emphasis on thoroughness in checking for errors.

Final Thoughts on Course Management

Inevitability of Changes

  • Explanation that changes in subject assignments are unavoidable; students must adapt accordingly as they shift focus from mathematics to language arts.

Commitment Required

  • Urging students to take responsibility for their work quality since it will contribute significantly towards future diagnostic assessments when working with actual students.

Guidance for Improvement

  • Encouragement for students to refer back to examples provided by previous cohorts while ensuring adherence to current formatting guidelines.

Starting the Project: Responsibilities and Commitment

Overview of Time Management

  • The speaker emphasizes the need for commitment as they begin their project, noting that while they have only 2 hours assigned weekly, the actual time spent is significantly more due to various responsibilities.
  • Acknowledges that students may have different time commitments, highlighting a disparity in workload expectations between students and educators.

Importance of Adhering to Guidelines

  • The speaker stresses the importance of following provided formats and guidelines; deviations could lead to needing revisions or repeating work.
  • Mentions a collaborative review process with team members Edwin and Pamela, indicating that feedback will be given collectively after final evaluations.

Pilot Testing Instruments

  • Discusses plans for validating instruments through expert validation and pilot testing with close contacts to ensure clarity and appropriateness before implementation in educational settings.
  • Stresses the necessity of delivering quality work that reflects well on the university, drawing from personal experiences during pre-professional practices.

Experiences in Educational Settings

Observational Roles vs. Active Participation

  • Shares insights from past experiences where some peers adopted a passive role during classroom observations instead of actively assisting teachers, leading to negative perceptions from educators.
  • Warns future participants about potential resistance from teachers if they do not engage proactively in educational environments.

Encouraging Collaboration

  • Urges students to adopt a mindset of collaboration when entering educational institutions; emphasizes mutual benefit when opportunities are presented by educators.
  • Reflecting on personal experiences, highlights how having responsible partners can enhance learning outcomes and foster positive relationships with faculty.

Addressing Feedback Mechanisms

Importance of Constructive Feedback

  • Notes that while taking notes is essential, it’s equally important to offer help when requested by instructors; this proactive approach can lead to better opportunities in future placements.

Challenges with Previous Work

  • A student raises concerns regarding inconsistencies in feedback received on previous assignments, specifically mentioning missing retroactive feedback which affects fairness in current tasks.

Group Dynamics and Accountability

  • The speaker acknowledges these concerns about group accountability and encourages all members to address prior feedback effectively before moving forward with new tasks.

Discussion on Educational Corrections and Feedback

Overview of the Correction Process

  • The speaker emphasizes the importance of identifying which questions were not completed by participants, suggesting that they should communicate specific years and questions for clarity.
  • Participants are encouraged to focus solely on correcting feedback related to their own submissions from the previous week, rather than addressing the entire document.
  • The speaker acknowledges that there is still time left in the process, allowing for corrections to be made progressively as observations arise.

Workload and Quality Expectations

  • A total of 348 questions need reviewing, indicating a significant workload; thus, participants are urged to approach their tasks with quality in mind.
  • The speaker reassures participants that they will have time to make necessary corrections based on feedback received.

Group Dynamics and Fairness in Task Distribution

  • There is a discussion about how tasks may be distributed among groups based on educational year or subject area, acknowledging potential inequities due to varying question counts across subjects.
  • The speaker proposes focusing efforts on one educational year per group to avoid confusion during task execution.

Addressing Concerns About Previous Submissions

  • Participants express concerns regarding fairness when comparing their work against previous groups' submissions.
  • One participant highlights discrepancies between their group's feedback and what was done by prior groups, questioning how distinctions will be made without naming individuals responsible for each submission.

Clarification of Responsibilities

  • The speaker clarifies that they can track contributions by group numbers assigned previously, ensuring accountability for quality control in submitted work.
  • It is noted that final evaluations will consider individual contributions from each group while also allowing room for improvement based on identified difficulties.

Group Review Process and Challenges

Group Assignments and Difficulties

  • The first group will review second, the second group third, etc., with students in math groups benefiting more due to their higher number of questions submitted.
  • Language and literature students face greater challenges as they submitted fewer questions (15 compared to 23), leading to potential difficulties in understanding.

Planning for Future Discussions

  • A discussion is planned for next week to address organization concerns regarding question reviews, aiming to prevent any dissatisfaction among students.
  • The instructor emphasizes the complexity of organizing final review questions, warning that it may lead to confusion similar to previous weeks. Students are reminded to check formats and question numbers carefully.

Collaboration and Document Management

  • Students are encouraged to work separately or collaboratively online on documents, ensuring all questions are addressed for better organization. The focus is on fulfilling all requirements efficiently.

Feedback and Clarifications

  • A student raises a concern about delayed feedback from a math professor regarding previously submitted questions, seeking clarity on how future feedback will be managed. This highlights issues with timely evaluations.
  • The instructor suggests focusing only on recent submissions for corrections while allowing older ones to pass without comment, indicating a need for streamlined processes moving forward.

Addressing Confusion in Feedback Processes

  • Another student points out inconsistencies in feedback documentation related to diagnostic questions and responses, stressing the importance of clear communication regarding scores and evaluations. This reflects ongoing confusion among students about grading criteria.
  • The instructor acknowledges these issues and plans corrective measures within two weeks, emphasizing the need for organized retroactive feedback sessions based on prior submissions. This aims at improving clarity in evaluation processes moving forward.

Discussion on Feedback and Formats in Mathematics Assignments

Importance of Uniformity in Questioning

  • The speaker emphasizes the need for uniformity in the number of questions assigned to ensure fairness among students, suggesting that having some students answer significantly fewer questions would be unjust.

Clarification on Assignment Reviews

  • A student raises a concern about not receiving feedback on their previous week's work, indicating that the absence of comments may imply satisfactory performance.

Understanding Feedback Mechanisms

  • The discussion shifts to the concept of feedback in mathematics assignments, where it is clarified that explaining procedures can count as feedback. Students are encouraged to include detailed explanations alongside correct answers.

Adjusting Terminology for Clarity

  • The instructor suggests changing the term "procedure" to "feedback" for clarity, emphasizing that including how problems are solved will facilitate easier grading by future evaluators.

Format Consistency Concerns

  • A student expresses confusion regarding which format to use for assignments due to conflicting information from different instructors. This highlights a need for clear guidelines on assignment formats and expectations.

Addressing Retroalimentación and Correct Answers

Confusion Over Required Elements

  • There is uncertainty about whether or not to include correct answers in assignments, with students recalling mixed messages from prior classes regarding this requirement.

Importance of Including Correct Answers

  • The instructor stresses the necessity of including correct answers along with suggested feedback so that students applying these questions do not face additional challenges during assessments.

Future Improvements and Review Process

  • It is mentioned that there will be an opportunity for students to review and improve their questions after two weeks, aiming for a final product that is consistent across all submissions.

Finalizing Assignment Formats

Accessing Required Formats

  • The instructor provides access to various assignment formats stored in designated folders, ensuring all students have the necessary resources at hand before proceeding with their tasks.

Class Attendance Check

  • The session transitions into taking attendance, highlighting engagement and participation among students present during this discussion.

This structured approach captures key discussions around assignment formats and feedback mechanisms while providing timestamps for easy reference.

Attendance and Initial Interactions in Class

Roll Call and Student Responses

  • The session begins with the professor confirming attendance, indicating a structured approach to class participation.
  • Multiple students respond affirmatively to their presence, showcasing engagement and readiness for the session.
  • Students continue to confirm their attendance, highlighting a supportive classroom environment where everyone is acknowledged.
  • The professor thanks each student as they respond, reinforcing positive interaction and encouraging participation.
  • A few students express greetings alongside their attendance, contributing to a friendly atmosphere.

Technical Issues and Connectivity Challenges

  • One student mentions connectivity issues that prevented them from responding earlier, illustrating common challenges in virtual learning environments.
  • Another student attempts to communicate but faces difficulties with microphone functionality, emphasizing the importance of reliable technology in online classes.
  • The professor addresses these technical concerns by acknowledging messages from students who are having trouble connecting or responding properly.

Review of Previous Week's Work

  • The professor indicates that they will review previous assignments from the last week, setting clear expectations for the current session's focus.
  • Students are reminded to concentrate on specific questions from prior work rather than revisiting older materials, streamlining the review process.

Time Management for Current Session

  • The professor suggests allocating 20 minutes for reviewing past questions but ultimately agrees on a 30-minute timeframe based on student feedback.
  • This flexibility demonstrates responsiveness to student needs while maintaining structure within the lesson plan.

Feedback Mechanism Discussion

  • A discussion arises regarding feedback provided by another instructor about document submissions; clarity is sought on how responses should be formatted within assignments.
  • The professor reassures students not to worry about certain comments made during feedback sessions, promoting confidence in their submission practices.

Discussion on Group Format Issues

Addressing Technical Difficulties

  • A participant expresses gratitude for clarification and mentions technical issues with their computer, indicating they are using a phone due to slow performance.
  • Another participant reports a power outage affecting their ability to participate fully, relying on a backup device with limited battery life.

Group Format Concerns

  • A member from group five raises concerns about complaints regarding their group's format, stating that they followed the provided example but received feedback suggesting it was incorrect.
  • The same member seeks guidance on whether to adapt their format based on peer feedback or stick with the original template provided by the instructor.

Clarification of Feedback Process

  • The participant notes confusion over conflicting feedback from an instructor named Edwin, who had previously only suggested minor adjustments.
  • They request assistance in understanding what specific changes need to be made since they feel lost amidst differing formats used by other groups.

Instructor's Guidance

  • The instructor advises the group to proceed with their current format while making necessary adjustments based on previous feedback rather than adopting another group's style.
  • It is emphasized that each group should focus solely on their own work and not alter others' contributions unless absolutely necessary.

Final Instructions and Distribution of Tasks

  • The instructor reiterates that groups should only modify content based on prior feedback received from Edwin and not worry about external formats.
  • As the session concludes, the instructor shares upcoming tasks for the week, clarifying expectations and distribution of responsibilities among participants.

Group Assignments and Instructions

Overview of Group Tasks

  • The instructor outlines the tasks for groups one through six, focusing on specific questions from the curriculum.
  • Group one will handle questions 23 to 27, while group two will cover questions 28 to 32, and group three will address questions 33 to 38.
  • Group two is advised to collaborate with group three due to a shortage of available questions for their own group.

Clarification on Task Distribution

  • The instructor checks for understanding among students regarding the task distribution and confirms clarity.
  • Groups four, five, and six are assigned tasks related to fourth-grade education, with each responsible for different sets of questions ranging from 24 to 38.

Fifth Grade Assignments

  • Groups seven through nine are tasked with fifth-grade assignments, each also handling five questions within specified ranges.
  • The instructor explains the continuity in question numbering across groups and clarifies any confusion regarding non-multiples of five.

Sixth Grade Responsibilities

  • Groups ten and eleven are assigned sixth-grade questions; group ten covers questions from 26 to 30 while group eleven addresses questions from 31 to 35.

Additional Instructions and Resources

  • Students are informed about accessing documents via WhatsApp for better organization of their work.
  • The instructor emphasizes that only language and literature materials are available in week six; students must download relevant documents from week five before uploading them back in week six.
  • A reminder is given that all activities must be submitted correctly according to the designated weeks.

Feedback Mechanism

  • Students discuss feedback received on previous submissions; some express concerns about missing retroactive comments in their formats.
  • The instructor reassures students that feedback was provided but encourages them to ensure it is included in future submissions.

Final Clarifications on Task Execution

  • Students inquire about completing prior year’s work alongside current assignments; they are encouraged to organize their responses clearly by maintaining proper order when submitting answers.

Document Organization and Questions for Week 6

Instructions for Document Submission

  • The instructor emphasizes the importance of organizing questions by their corresponding numbers in the document for Week 6.
  • Students are instructed to copy and paste their answers into the designated documents, ensuring clarity and organization.

Time Management During Class

  • A time limit of 15 minutes is set for students to complete their tasks, highlighting the need for efficient use of class time.
  • The instructor reminds students to register their attendance promptly to avoid complications later.

Clarifications on Matrix Format

Addressing Formatting Concerns

  • A student raises a concern about discrepancies between different matrices created by classmates, prompting a discussion on how to integrate new information correctly.
  • Another student questions whether they should maintain or change the format based on feedback received, indicating potential confusion regarding assignment requirements.

Importance of Consistency

  • The instructor stresses that students should adhere strictly to the provided format while completing their assignments.

Handling Duplicated Topics in Assignments

Discussion on Topic Selection

  • A student expresses uncertainty about selecting topics due to perceived duplications within the matrix, leading to further clarification from peers.
  • The instructor acknowledges this issue and commits to reviewing the matrix for any duplicated topics that may confuse students.

Clarifying Assignment Guidelines

  • Students are reminded to follow only the matrix guidelines when completing assignments, despite variations in titles or strategies presented in previous materials.

Final Reminders and Assistance Links

Attendance and Resource Sharing

  • The instructor requests that attendance links be shared among students via WhatsApp, ensuring everyone has access.

Closing Remarks

  • Students are encouraged once more not to forget registering their attendance as class concludes.