Lección 7 - Sistemas lineales | Álgebra Lineal I | UNED

Lección 7 - Sistemas lineales | Álgebra Lineal I | UNED

Introduction to Linear Systems

Overview of Linear Equations

  • The discussion begins with an introduction to linear systems, emphasizing the importance of understanding linear equations within this context.
  • A linear equation is defined as an expression involving coefficients and variables over a specific field K .
  • The general form of a linear equation is presented: a_1x_1 + a_2x_2 + ... + a_nx_n = b , where all elements belong to the same field K .

Components of Linear Equations

  • Coefficients ( a_i ) are identified as key components in the equation, while the variables ( x_i ) represent unknowns.
  • The term b is referred to as the independent term, which plays a crucial role in determining solutions for the equation.

Understanding Solutions

  • A solution to the linear equation involves finding values for x_1, x_2, ..., x_n that satisfy the equality.
  • Solutions can be represented as ordered tuples (or n-tuples), indicating that order matters in these lists of elements.

Types of Linear Equations

Homogeneous vs. Non-Homogeneous Equations

  • An important distinction is made between homogeneous equations (where b = 0 ) and non-homogeneous equations.

Special Cases in Solutions

  • Two extreme cases are highlighted regarding solutions: incompatible equations and trivial equations.

Incompatible Equations

  • Incompatible equations occur when all coefficients are zero but b neq 0, leading to no possible solutions.

Trivial Equations

Understanding Linear Systems

Introduction to Linear Equations

  • The concept of a linear equation with n unknowns is introduced, emphasizing the combination of multiple linear equations to form a linear system.
  • It is clarified that while all equations in the system must have the same number of unknowns, not all variables need to appear in every equation; absent variables imply their coefficients are zero.

Definition of a Linear System

  • A linear system consists of m equations with n unknowns, expressed in a specific format involving coefficients and independent terms.
  • The notation for representing systems can vary (e.g., using calligraphic letters), but it fundamentally involves multiple linear equations set equal to certain constants.

Structure of Linear Equations

  • Each equation within the system can be represented as a sum of products between coefficients and variables equated to an independent term.
  • The structure continues through all m equations, maintaining consistency in the number of unknowns across each equation.

Solving Linear Systems

  • To solve these systems, one must find values for the unknowns that satisfy all equations simultaneously rather than just one.
  • A solution is defined as an ordered tuple from Cartesian space that satisfies each equation within the system. There may be multiple solutions or none at all.

General Solution Concept

  • The general solution refers to the complete set of solutions for a given linear system, allowing comparisons between different systems based on their solution sets.

Comparing Systems: Equality vs. Equivalence

  • When comparing two systems, it's essential to determine if they are equivalent—meaning they provide identical information regarding their solutions—even if they differ structurally.
  • Two systems are considered equivalent if they yield the same general solution set rather than requiring exact equality in coefficients or structure.

Example Systems and Their Properties

  • An example illustrates how two systems with three variables can still be valid even if some variables do not appear explicitly due to having zero coefficients.

Understanding Linear Systems and Solutions

Importance of Specifying Variables in Equations

  • The discussion emphasizes the necessity of indicating unknown variables in equations to understand the structure, such as whether we are dealing with three or more variables.
  • It is crucial to specify how many variables (e.g., x1, x2, x3) are present in a system to determine the nature of solutions.

Exploring Possible Solutions

  • A potential solution is proposed where specific values for variables (e.g., x1 = 1, x3 = 2) are suggested to satisfy an equation.
  • The example illustrates that if x1 + x2 + x3 equals 5, then all variable values must be adjusted accordingly (x2 = 2).

Validating Solutions Against Equations

  • The speaker introduces a new system (S2), which includes different equations and explores how previous solutions apply.
  • Substituting previously found solutions into S2 reveals inconsistencies; thus, it fails to validate as a solution for this new system.

Understanding System Equivalence

  • If one equation does not hold true for a given solution across systems, they cannot be considered equivalent.
  • The concept of equivalence is clarified: two systems must share all solutions to be deemed equivalent.

Introduction to Linear Systems Concepts

  • New concepts introduced include incompatible systems (no solution), trivial systems (all points are solutions), and homogeneous systems (all equations are homogeneous).
  • The transition from discussing individual equations to linear systems marks a significant conceptual shift in understanding mathematical relationships.

Matrix Representation of Linear Systems

  • The speaker begins characterizing linear systems using matrix forms, highlighting their importance in simplifying complex relationships.
  • A general form of linear equations is presented using matrices, emphasizing the need for clarity regarding the number of unknown variables involved.

Clarifying Unknown Variables and Coefficients

  • It’s essential always to specify the number of unknown variables when discussing linear systems; missing coefficients can lead to confusion about the system's validity.

Matrix Representation of Linear Systems

Understanding Matrix Structure

  • The discussion begins with the formation of a matrix composed of coefficients from various equations, denoted as a_ij, where i represents rows and j represents columns.
  • The matrix is defined to have m rows and n columns, with all elements belonging to a field K. The speaker prefers lowercase notation for matrices.
  • A column matrix X is introduced, containing elements from x_1 to x_n, structured as an m times 1 matrix.
  • The coefficient matrix (A), the unknown vector (X), and the independent terms vector (B) are identified as crucial components in linear systems.

Operations on Matrices

  • Basic operations on matrices include addition, subtraction, transposition, and multiplication. For multiplication, the number of columns in the first matrix must equal the number of rows in the second.
  • The compatibility condition for multiplying matrices is highlighted: if A has n columns and X has n rows, their product can be computed.

Rewriting Linear Systems

  • The system of linear equations can be rewritten using these matrices: multiplying A by X yields results comparable to B. This facilitates easier manipulation and comparison between equations.
  • When two matrices are equal, they must match element-wise; this principle aids in solving systems by comparing corresponding entries.

Augmented Matrix Definition

  • An augmented matrix combines both coefficient and independent term matrices into one structure for ease of analysis.
  • There’s a preference against using an asterisk (*) notation due to its existing mathematical connotations; instead, a vertical line is suggested for clarity.

Constructing the Augmented Matrix

  • The augmented matrix includes all elements from A followed by an additional column representing B. Each row corresponds to an equation's coefficients plus its constant term.
  • This construction maintains m rows but increases columns from n to n+1 by adding the independent terms column at the end.

Understanding Matrix Operations in Linear Systems

Visualizing Matrices and Their Components

  • The use of lines in matrices helps visualize the relationship between different components, specifically separating matrix A from the independent term B.
  • Working with a system involves understanding both the coefficient matrix and the independent term matrix, which can be combined into an augmented matrix for easier manipulation.

Operations on Matrices

  • Focus is placed on row operations rather than column operations to maintain the integrity of variable positions within systems.
  • The order of elements in solutions is crucial; changing their position alters coefficients, emphasizing the need for structured operations.

Equivalence of Linear Systems

  • Only row operations will be permitted when working with linear systems to ensure that unknown variables remain consistent.
  • Identifying equivalent linear systems relies on recognizing that they share identical solution sets when represented by their respective matrices.

Theorems on Matrix Equivalence

  • Two linear systems can be expressed as equivalent if their augmented matrices are related through row operations.
  • This equivalence indicates that all solutions from one system are also valid for another, reinforcing the concept of shared solution spaces.

Practical Application: Example Systems

  • For two systems to have identical solutions, their corresponding augmented matrices must be equivalent under row operations.
  • An example illustrates how a given system can be rewritten in matrix form, highlighting its structure and relationships among variables.

Understanding Linear Systems and Matrix Equivalence

Formulating the System

  • The initial setup involves a linear equation represented as 5x_1 + 4x_3 = 6, which is part of a larger system. A matrix representation, denoted as A', is introduced with coefficients arranged in a 3x3 format.
  • The vector of unknowns is corrected to include x_1, x_2, and x_3. The augmented matrix now includes independent terms: sixes corresponding to each equation.

Matrix Operations and Equivalence

  • The augmented matrix has dimensions of 3x4. It’s emphasized that for two matrices to be row equivalent, they must have the same size; otherwise, equivalence cannot be established.
  • If two matrices are not equivalent due to differing sizes, it implies that their corresponding systems do not share solutions. This highlights the importance of matrix size in determining solution equivalence.

Row Operations and Solution Consistency

  • Performing row operations on an augmented matrix does not alter the overall solution set of the linear system. This allows for simplification without losing essential information about solutions.
  • Even if operations simplify a complex system into a more manageable form, the fundamental solutions remain unchanged throughout these transformations.

Types of Solutions in Linear Systems

  • Various outcomes can arise from solving linear systems: no solutions (inconsistent), one unique solution (consistent), or infinitely many solutions (dependent).
  • Systems may exhibit incompatibility leading to no solutions or trivial equations resulting in infinite solutions. However, having multiple distinct solutions typically indicates an infinite number of possibilities.

Cardinality and Solution Sets

  • The cardinality of the solution set (S) can yield three scenarios: zero (no solution), one (unique solution), or infinite (infinitely many solutions).
  • Demonstrating that if there are multiple solutions then they must be infinite becomes crucial; this requires proving that any additional valid solution leads to further valid combinations within the system.

Exploring Combinations of Solutions

  • Assuming two distinct solutions exist within a linear system leads to exploring combinations expressed through scalar multiplication and addition.
  • Any combination formed by scaling existing solutions will also satisfy the original equations, reinforcing how new valid points emerge from existing ones under certain conditions.

Understanding Linear Systems and Their Solutions

Matrix Representation and Solutions

  • The speaker discusses the placement of variables in a linear system, indicating that both lambda cdot B and (1 - lambda) cdot B can be used interchangeably with solutions represented by matrices.
  • A mathematical expression is introduced: lambda cdot B + (1 - lambda) cdot B = 1 cdot B, simplifying to just matrix B. This indicates that the combination of these terms leads back to the original matrix.
  • The concept of a solution being constructed from various scalars is emphasized, suggesting that if the field K has infinite elements, there will be infinitely many solutions.

Types of Linear Systems

  • The discussion shifts to identifying types of systems based on their solutions. If the field K has finite elements, such as four or eight, then only a limited number of solutions exist.
  • Three possible scenarios for linear systems are outlined:
  • Incompatible System: No solution exists.
  • Compatible Determined System: Exactly one solution exists.
  • Compatible Indeterminate System: Infinitely many solutions exist.

Classifying Linear Systems

  • The speaker introduces terminology for classifying systems:
  • Incompatible systems are denoted as S.
  • Compatible determined systems are abbreviated as SCD.
  • Compatible indeterminate systems are referred to as SI.
  • Emphasis is placed on understanding which type of system one is dealing with before attempting to solve it explicitly.

Resolving vs. Discussing Systems

  • The goal when introducing linear systems is to resolve them; however, determining the type of system first can save unnecessary effort in finding solutions that may not exist.
  • Distinction between "resolving" (finding explicit solutions) and "discussing" (classifying the system's nature without solving it).

Understanding Linear Systems and Matrix Representation

The Challenge of Finding Solutions

  • The speaker discusses the difficulty in finding solutions to linear systems, indicating a cyclical problem where attempts to resolve lead back to the same issues without success.

Matrix Representation of Linear Systems

  • A linear representation using matrices has been established, allowing for equivalence between systems through row operations. The focus is on classifying linear systems as incompatible, compatible determined, or compatible indeterminate.

Importance of Augmented Matrices

  • The discussion emphasizes the use of augmented matrices to extract information about linear systems solely through appropriate matrix operations. Row operations are highlighted as crucial for this analysis.

Concept of Matrix Rank

  • The concept of matrix rank is introduced as a key factor in characterizing system behavior. It is noted that rank remains invariant under row operations, making it essential for classification purposes.

Classification Based on Rank

  • To classify linear systems effectively, the speaker explains that transforming them into an augmented matrix condenses all necessary information. This allows for classification based on the rank of these matrices rather than their apparent complexity.

Theorems Related to Linear Systems

Introduction to Cramer’s Theorem

  • Cramer’s theorem is mentioned as a foundational principle before delving deeper into concepts like pivot elements and their significance in determining system compatibility.

System Compatibility Conditions

  • For a system represented by an augmented matrix with 'm' equations and 'n' unknowns, if there is no pivot in the last column, it indicates incompatibility; thus requiring further conditions for compatibility determination.

Determining Compatible Systems

  • A compatible determined system exists when the augmented matrix has exactly 'n' pivots while lacking one in the last column. This ensures that solutions can be uniquely identified within the constraints provided by 'm' equations.

Characterization Through Ranks

Identifying Indeterminate Systems

  • If an augmented matrix has fewer than 'n' pivots (denoted as K), it indicates that the system is compatible indeterminate. This highlights how pivotal positions relate directly back to original coefficient matrices.

Operations Affecting Rank Invariance

  • Row operations maintain rank invariance; hence understanding ranks provides insight into system behavior without needing explicit pivot identification across various transformations applied during analysis.

Final Conditions for System Compatibility

Criteria for Incompatibility

  • A system is deemed incompatible if there exists a discrepancy between the ranks of its coefficient matrix and its augmented counterpart—specifically when the latter's rank exceeds that of the former due to additional constraints introduced by B.

Conditions for Determined Compatibility

Understanding Matrix Ranks and Solutions

Characteristics of Systems of Equations

  • A system is compatible indeterminate if the rank of matrix A equals the rank of the augmented matrix but is less than the total number of variables (n).
  • The concept of rank is crucial for square matrices, particularly when discussing invertibility; a square matrix with full rank can be inverted.

Invertibility and Unique Solutions

  • For a square matrix to guarantee a unique solution in a linear system Ax = B, it must have full rank (n).
  • A linear system represented by a square matrix is compatible determined if its rank equals n, indicating that the matrix is invertible.

Solving Linear Systems

  • While we can classify systems as compatible or incompatible, determining specific solutions requires transforming the system through row operations.
  • Row operations lead to an equivalent system that simplifies solving, often resulting in reduced row echelon form.

Reduced Row Echelon Form

  • The goal is to reach a simplified form with as many leading ones and zeros as possible, which maintains equivalence to the original system.
  • Achieving this form allows for easier resolution of systems, especially when dealing with square matrices.

Special Cases: Square Matrices

  • If matrix A has maximum rank (invertible), finding unique solutions becomes straightforward using row reduction techniques.
  • When reducing an invertible matrix to its Hermite form results in an identity matrix, it directly leads to solutions for x.

Utilizing Determinants for Solutions

  • Row operations not only help classify systems but also facilitate their resolution.
  • Cramer’s Rule provides an alternative method for solving small systems using determinants instead of row operations.

Application of Cramer's Rule

  • Cramer’s Rule applies specifically to linear systems where A cdot x = B, allowing us to find unique solutions via determinants when A is invertible.

Understanding Cramer's Rule and Matrix Operations

Introduction to Matrices and Determinants

  • The discussion begins with the introduction of a matrix A and its determinant, which is crucial for applying Cramer's Rule.
  • The first column of matrix A is replaced by the independent term to form a new matrix A_1 , which allows for the calculation of the first solution.

Calculation of Solutions Using Cramer’s Rule

  • The second value in the tuple, denoted as s_2 , is derived from another matrix A_2 , created by replacing the second column of A with the independent term.
  • This process continues for each component until reaching the last component, where we denote it as s_n = det(A_n) .

Example System of Linear Equations

  • An example system of linear equations is introduced:
  • x_1 + x_2 + x_3 = 4
  • -x_1 + x_2 - x_3 = 2
  • Additional equations are considered to avoid fractions in calculations.

Characteristics of Linear Systems

  • It’s noted that while one coefficient may be zero, it does not indicate how many unknown variables exist within the system.
  • Clarification on having three unknown variables in this complete linear system is provided.

Augmented Matrix Formation

  • The augmented matrix for this system is constructed, combining coefficients and constants into a single matrix format.
  • Row operations are performed on this augmented matrix to achieve row echelon form.

Row Reduction Process

  • The second row undergoes transformation to eliminate non-zero elements below pivots through strategic row additions.
  • Further simplifications lead to obtaining zeros beneath pivot positions while maintaining other necessary values.

Achieving Reduced Row Echelon Form (RREF)

  • Transformations continue until achieving RREF, where each pivot equals one and all other entries in those columns are zeroed out.
  • Final adjustments yield a fully reduced form indicating successful completion of row reduction techniques.

Conclusion on Matrix Rank

Understanding the Rank of an Augmented Matrix

Determining Compatibility of the System

  • The rank of the augmented matrix is discussed, highlighting that it consists of three matrices while ignoring a vertical line. This indicates that both ranks are equal.
  • The discussion shifts to whether the system is determined or indeterminate, concluding that since both ranks equal three (the number of unknowns), it confirms a compatible and determined system with a unique solution.

Finding the Unique Solution

  • Upon reaching reduced row echelon form, the unique solution can be derived from values on the right side of the matrix.
  • The specific values for x_1, x_2, and x_3 are identified as 3, 3, and -2 respectively, establishing these as components of the solution tuple.

Application of Cramer's Rule

  • The type of system analyzed is characterized by a square matrix with maximum rank; thus, it is invertible. This allows for applying Cramer’s rule to find solutions.
  • A determinant calculation for matrix A_1 involves substituting its first column with independent terms (4, 2, 1).

Calculating Determinants

  • Steps to calculate determinants using elementary row operations are outlined. For example:
  • Top determinant simplifies through various multiplications and subtractions leading to a final value.
  • Further calculations yield additional determinants where simplifications lead to consistent results across different methods.

Consistency in Results

  • When calculating coefficients for other variables like S_2, it's noted that previous determinants can be reused without recalculating them entirely.
  • Final determinant calculations confirm consistency in results obtained through both direct computation and Cramer’s rule application.