Ing 5000tpd Revisión de Propuesta Técnica HATCH 20260122 092043 Grabación de la reunión

Understanding Resource Blockage Models

Importance of Representative Sampling

• The process begins with obtaining a representative sample through resource blockage models and geometallurgical models, which help predict mineral behavior for the current and upcoming years.

• This predictive capability allows for effective planning, blending strategies, and understanding which minerals to focus on or avoid.

Characterization of Minerals

• Characterizing the mineral is crucial; it confirms existing knowledge about the project and informs decisions regarding new technologies like HPGR (High Pressure Grinding Rolls).

• The characterization process involves assessing whether the mineral falls within acceptable ranges as determined by expert groups. Approval from these experts is necessary before proceeding with alternative methods.

Trade-off Analysis in Project Planning

Defining Trade-offs

• Trade-off criteria are essential for reaching final definitions in project planning, including circuit design and technology selection based on economic scenarios such as cash flow analysis.

• Recommendations for circuit designs are primarily influenced by mineral characteristics, leading to optimal selections that align with production programs.

Engineering Feasibility Phase

• The engineering feasibility phase follows decision approval, focusing on defining rules at a Class 3 design level with an estimated CAPEX variance of ±15%. Advanced engineering is projected at around 40% completion during this phase.

• A comparison shows that typical feasibility engineering reaches only about 5%, highlighting significant progress in this stage due to detailed deliverables outlined by ACC standards.

Technical Specifications and Modeling

Equipment Dimensioning

• Detailed processes include energy balances to determine currents and contaminant levels, which inform equipment dimensioning specifications needed for vendor quotations. This step is critical for accurate cost estimations and project viability assessments.

Integration into 3D Models

• Design criteria feed into a 3D model that minimizes risks associated with interferences while facilitating multidisciplinary integration across various engineering disciplines involved in the project.

• Effective modeling relies on precise scanning techniques to achieve required density levels for accurate load definitions, typically set at a standard of 300 for feasibility-level projects. This ensures comprehensive data extraction necessary for estimating quantities accurately.

Engineering Value Delivery and Cost Estimation

Importance of Engineering in Cost Estimation

• A house of engineering delivers value to clients based on the precision of cost estimations, which is fundamentally rooted in engineering practices.

• Different levels of detail are required for models to achieve their objectives; for instance, DAME 450 represents a detailed engineering approach that may not be recommended due to CAPEX considerations.

Model Development and Collaboration

• The platform requires interaction with clients; access to 3D platforms is provided for design reviews, facilitating contributions from client engineering teams.

• A general list of deliverables across disciplines is presented, emphasizing the importance of understanding feasibility engineering limits.

Design Criteria and Process Information

• Key design criteria such as technology capacity (5,000 defined units) must align with process information to initiate the 3D model development.

• Synchronization between project phases (e.g., campaign 3Ware) is crucial as it influences equipment sizing and operational parameters like residence times.

Parallel Workflows and Technical Management

• Parallel workflows are essential; minor adjustments occur post-results from Tesbur. Emphasis on technical management focuses on topographical studies and laser scanning.

• Supervision ensures adherence to standards during field execution while addressing important project requirements such as permits.

Engineering Support for Permits

• The transition towards obtaining necessary permits involves collaboration between design engineers who understand the project's specifics.

• Clients have the freedom to choose companies for permit engineering but should ensure prior knowledge exists to avoid starting from scratch when defining layouts.

Integration of Design Elements into Economic Models

• Effective integration of design elements into economic models expedites costs and timelines associated with permit engineering when initiated by clients.

• All work related to design criteria culminates in an economic model that accurately reflects precise measurements derived from comprehensive 3D modeling efforts.

CAPEX and OPEX Management in Project Execution

Overview of CAPEX and OPEX

• Discussion on the implications of CAPEX (Capital Expenditure) management, including productivity, labor, contingencies, and the discipline involved in handling extensive spreadsheets provided to stakeholders.

• Introduction of a T-ROOM Bank for evaluating project profitability and timelines based on the CAPEX and OPEX estimations.

Engineering Process Insights

• Timeline estimation indicating that four months are needed for mobilization and information gathering to understand geometallurgical aspects effectively.

• Explanation of the feasibility engineering phase involving 3D modeling, which requires approximately five months; details on how progress is assessed through stages (30%, 60%, 100%).

Project Execution Plan (PEP)

• Emphasis on the Project Execution Plan (PEP), which outlines key strategies for project execution including engineering approaches, contracting strategies, and risk management.

• The PEP serves as a crucial deliverable that addresses various components such as scheduling, constructability assessments, and overall project strategy.

Technical Review Process

• Acknowledgment of time constraints during presentations while emphasizing the importance of understanding proposals thoroughly before moving forward.

Engineering Development Stages

• Transition to discussing technical evaluations with Edson regarding standardizing visions for post-operation assessments focusing on technical education evaluations.

• Breakdown of engineering processes into structured phases including site visits, previous style reviews, geotechnical measurements, and metallurgical plans.

Equipment Selection Considerations

• Discussion about evaluating alternatives in equipment selection based on trade-offs; emphasis on improving service delivery through better equipment choices.

Location Analysis for Expansion

• Exploration of potential expansion options with four proposed alternatives: enhancing existing facilities or relocating based on operational needs.

Detailed Engineering Deliverables

• Outline of deliverables required at this stage across various disciplines such as process engineering, civil works, electrical systems, instrumentation control, along with necessary permits.

Discussion on Project Scope and Documentation

Overview of Project Mapping

• The discussion begins with a focus on organizing project documentation by area and discipline, emphasizing the importance of clarity in mapping out the project plan.

• Confirmation is sought regarding aspects outside the main spreadsheet, particularly concerning capital expenditures (capex) and operational expenditures (opex), which are to be documented separately.

Inclusion of Key Documents

• A colleague highlights the necessity of including the Project Execution Plan (PEP) and schedule, along with permits and observations during management with authorities.

• The speaker clarifies their limited expertise in permits but acknowledges that assistance from Daniel Tito's unit will be essential for understanding permit-related processes.

Observations and Authority Engagement

• The conversation touches on how observations from authorities can vary significantly, ranging from no issues to multiple points needing resolution, often involving reimbursable costs.

• It is noted that engineering design must align with requirements for obtaining necessary environmental permits like EIA or MEIA.

Coordination on Permits

• Mabel’s request leads to a suggestion to involve the permits team for further clarification on required activities related to permissions.

• The speaker offers to connect Mabel with Daniel Tito to ensure all permit needs are addressed under a unified service structure.

Clarification on Environmental Management Instruments

• Paolo raises concerns about maintaining clarity in scope while discussing item 14 in Hudson's shared template, specifically regarding descriptive memory needed for environmental management instruments.

• It is clarified that while engineering proposals will support an environmental management instrument, they do not directly manage it themselves.

Deliverables and Operational Manuals

• There is an emphasis on ensuring specific scopes are included through Daniel’s guidance, especially concerning deliverables like operation manuals.

• A confirmation is sought about whether operational manuals are part of current considerations; it appears they may need inclusion based on project necessities.

This structured summary captures key discussions around project documentation, scope clarification, authority engagement processes, and deliverables within the context provided.

Clarification on Deliverables and Integration

Overview of Proposal Structure

• The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in point 7, particularly regarding process manuals to avoid confusion.

• A detailed breakdown of deliverables is presented, including documents, plans, and 3D model-related outputs. This aims to enhance proposal integrity.

Specific Areas of Focus

• It is noted that some deliverables may be integrated within a single layout, such as process PPDs.

• A request is made to categorize deliverables by specific areas to facilitate differentiation among them.

Integration and Manual Requirements

• The integration section will encompass KAPEX and OPEX details from sections 8 to 16. Additional topics like risk analysis and economic modeling are also mentioned.

• Manuals typically arise during detailed engineering phases; however, they can be produced earlier if necessary, impacting time and costs.

Review Process

• The final task will require thorough review support from the team to ensure all information extracted aligns with expectations.

• There’s an acknowledgment that one review session may not suffice; additional sessions might be needed for comprehensive evaluation.

Deliverable Breakdown and Platform Discussion

General Deliverable Expectations

• Clarification is sought on general plans across disciplines, aiming for specificity in naming conventions for deliverables.

Data Management Platforms

• Questions arise regarding the use of data management platforms like Microstation versus Autodesk for generating 2D plans.

Current Practices at Volcan

• Volcan does not directly utilize certain platforms but recognizes their advantages. They primarily work with Autodesk models across various projects.

Platform Agnosticism and Project Development

Flexibility in Software Use

• Hatch's agnostic approach allows flexibility in platform choice; they have experience with both Bentley Microstation and Autodesk environments.

Transitioning Between Platforms

• If Autodesk is chosen as the working platform, Hatch can easily adapt their proposals accordingly without significant disruption.

Project Standards and Element Differentiation

Importance of Standardization

• Emphasis on understanding existing project standards within teams to align methodologies effectively.

Load Differentiation

• Discussion includes differentiating between primary elements crucial for plant operations versus secondary elements within disciplines.

Project Execution and Collaboration Insights

Overview of Project Execution Plan (PEP)

• The discussion emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive execution model that will serve future collaboration, ensuring all teams are aligned with project goals.

• Clarification on the PEP's role in transitioning from engineering to construction phases, highlighting its significance in supporting schedules and strategies.

• Acknowledgment of the need for a detailed work plan, indicating that effective execution management is crucial for project success.

Software and Tools Utilization

• Discussion on the necessity for specific software tools like Autodesk for 3D modeling, emphasizing the importance of having clear communication channels among team members.

• Request for using dedicated software (e.g., JGCmeds or Metzine) instead of Excel for mass balance calculations to enhance validation speed and accuracy.

Stakeholder Engagement and Model Requirements

• Importance of providing stakeholders with a Building Information Modeling (BIM) at LOD100 level post-alternative selection to clarify volumetric details and equipment placement.

• Emphasis on ensuring all stakeholders understand equipment locations and distributions as part of advancing project alternatives.

Meeting Coordination and Timeline Management

• Plans to schedule key meetings within the next week to address necessary adjustments, aiming for efficient communication between teams.

• Proposal to hold multiple meetings consecutively early in the week to expedite updates on proposals while maintaining coordination across different teams.

Final Thoughts on Project Progression

• The focus remains on minimizing delays in receiving updated proposals by coordinating effectively across various teams involved in the project.