¿Qué es en resumidas cuentas el Ego Trascendental? Por Joaquín Robles.

Understanding the Role of Institutions and Language in Knowledge Construction

The Foundation of Knowledge

• The discussion begins with the assertion that subjects are not viewed from a distributive perspective but are clustered within institutions, which presuppose a transcendental ego.

• Language is highlighted as essential for subjects to operate and construct any form of knowledge; this language does not originate from the subject but ascends to them, indicating a transcendental aspect.

The Importance of Myths

• Myths play a crucial role in constructing general ontology; they are necessary rather than irrational, contrary to David's refutation of myths.

• The myth of the "map of the world" is deemed essential; removing it also removes both general and special ontology, emphasizing their interdependence.

Ontology Perspectives

• Special ontology cannot be understood without general ontology; it adopts a nosological rather than an epistemological perspective.

• Subjects exist within institutions and cannot be reduced to mere epistemological or psychological entities; they are embedded in traditions that shape their understanding.

Scientific Constructs and Reality

• Scientific constructions contribute to shaping reality itself, challenging the notion that there exists a separate world independent of subjects or objects.

• The idea that science merely discovers pre-existing structures is critiqued; instead, science actively constructs its own understanding of the world.

The Demiurge Concept

• A demiurge or creator figure is necessary for understanding how sciences construct reality; without this concept, comprehension falters.

• This demiurge aligns with what Gustavo Bueno refers to as the transcendental ego—not as a metaphysical entity but as an essential component in knowledge construction.