Dra. Virginia Domingo "Que es y que no es Justicia Restaurativa"

Name: Dra. Virginia Domingo "Que es y que no es Justicia Restaurativa"
Uploaded: 2020-08-11T21:08:18.000Z
Duration: 3 h 8 min 52 s
Description: Virginia Domingo nos explica que es y que no es la Justicia Restaurativa

Introduction to the Conference

Opening Remarks

The conference is organized by Sergio, focusing on restorative justice in collaboration with the Guadalajara City Council and its General Secretariat. The commitment of the legal community to contribute is emphasized.

Acknowledgment of gratitude towards Sergio, Dr. Virginia, and all attendees for their participation in this series of four conferences on restorative justice. The importance of societal engagement is highlighted.

Introduction of Dr. Virginia

A brief summary of Dr. Virginia's curriculum vitae is presented to avoid lengthy introductions, emphasizing her expertise in restorative justice and mediation from the University of Burgos, Spain.

Dr. Virginia has extensive experience teaching criminology and law at various institutions and has coordinated numerous programs related to restorative justice since 2017. Her role as a consultant for international organizations is noted as well.

Dr. Virginia's Background and Expertise

Professional Experience

She has been involved in various roles including tutoring advanced studies on restorative justice at the University of Geneva and coordinating services in Castilla y León, Spain. Her leadership in international congresses on social restoration and penal mediation is acknowledged.

Membership in European judicial groups focused on mediation highlights her influence within the field; she has also advised the European Commission regarding victim rights legislation since 2002.

Contributions to Restorative Justice

Dr. Virginia’s work includes training practices across multiple countries such as Mexico, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, and Costa Rica; she actively participates in workshops sharing insights into restorative justice principles globally.

She maintains a blog dedicated to restorative justice that serves as a resource for many citizens interested in this evolving field; it will be shared with attendees later during the conference session.

Understanding Restorative Justice

Conceptual Overview

In her opening remarks, Dr. Virginia expresses gratitude for being invited to discuss restorative justice—a concept she believes evolves continuously over time based on societal needs and perspectives.

Historical Context

She emphasizes that while restorative justice isn't new—having existed throughout history—it has often been overshadowed by state-centric approaches to conflict resolution where individuals relinquish control over personal disputes to third parties (e.g., courts). This shift away from self-agency is critiqued as detrimental to personal empowerment during conflicts like separations or custody battles.

Cultural Perspectives

Notably mentions that some cultures do not even recognize prisons as a form of punishment; instead, they focus on restoring balance after harm occurs within communities—highlighting diverse approaches toward achieving justice globally.

This structured approach provides clarity about key themes discussed during the conference while allowing easy navigation through timestamps linked directly back to specific moments within the transcript content.

Justice and Restorative Practices

The Global Perspective on Restorative Justice

Emphasizes the need for a global approach to restorative justice, suggesting that individual efforts can lead to significant changes in society.

Discusses the origins of restorative justice within the penal system and its applicability in various human interactions, including family and community settings.

Preventive Measures in Restorative Justice

Advocates for proactive measures to prevent harm rather than addressing it post-factum, highlighting the community's role in resolving conflicts historically.

References traditional practices among indigenous peoples, such as communal gatherings around fire for conflict resolution, illustrating historical roots of restorative approaches.

Humanizing Justice

Introduces a quote about understanding individuals beyond their actions, advocating for a more humane perspective on justice.

Contrasts traditional legal definitions of crime with restorative views that focus on the damage caused to individuals and communities rather than just legal violations.

Understanding Victimhood and Community Impact

Critiques how traditional justice systems often overlook victims' voices by relegating them to mere witnesses instead of central figures in the process.

Highlights that crimes cause harm not only to direct victims but also affect communities and even offenders themselves.

The Ripple Effect of Crime on Communities

Discusses how crime impacts societal trust and safety, leading to broader emotional consequences like fear and isolation among community members.

Stresses that everyone is affected by crime, particularly when it occurs nearby, resulting in diminished feelings of security and connection with others.

Rebuilding Empathy through Restorative Practices

Argues that restoring empathy is crucial for community cohesion; loss of familiarity with neighbors leads to mistrust.

Reflects on personal experiences from childhood where neighborly relationships fostered a sense of community compared to current societal dynamics.

Rethinking Legal Language and Accessibility

Critiques complex legal language that alienates victims from understanding their rights or processes within the judicial system.

Calls for simplification of legal communication so victims feel empowered rather than intimidated during judicial proceedings.

Justice and Restorative Practices

Understanding Restorative Justice

Restorative justice aims to include all affected parties, directly or indirectly, empowering victims rather than merely measuring punishment in monetary terms.

The speaker emphasizes that it is inappropriate for others to dictate how a victim should be compensated; many victims do not prioritize financial restitution.

Victims often seek commitments from offenders to prevent future harm, reflecting a belief in human goodness and empathy towards others' suffering.

Challenges in Addressing Serious Crimes

In cases of serious crimes, reparations cannot always restore life but can focus on moral and psychological healing; however, some legal systems restrict this approach.

The speaker argues against the prohibition of restorative processes for serious offenses, highlighting the need for victim participation without further victimization.

Misconceptions About Restorative Justice

There is a common misunderstanding that restorative justice only involves direct meetings between victims and offenders; preparatory sessions are crucial for effective outcomes.

The speaker clarifies that restorative justice encompasses various methods beyond simple face-to-face meetings.

Societal Responsibility and Crime Prevention

The discussion includes the idea that societal failures contribute to criminal behavior; understanding these factors is essential for prevention efforts.

Emphasizing emotional decision-making over rationality suggests that community actions can help reduce crime through preventive measures at local levels.

Rethinking Punishment and Rehabilitation

Traditional punitive approaches may exacerbate violence rather than deter it; restorative practices focus on community reintegration and support for offenders seeking change.

A participant's upcoming monologue highlights their journey from self-identifying as a "criminal" to recognizing themselves as someone who has caused harm but can also heal.

Moving Beyond Victimhood

If a victim continues to identify solely as such after many years, it indicates systemic failure; support should aim to transition them into survivors rather than perpetuating their victim status.

Understanding Restorative Justice

The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice

Restorative justice is not a cure-all but yields positive outcomes, as it offers a more legitimate and fair experience compared to punitive measures.

The fear of punishment can have counterproductive effects; individuals may feel hopeless when faced with long sentences, leading to negative emotional states.

Victim Perspectives and Expectations

Many victims place their hopes in the judicial process, expecting satisfaction from the outcome. However, they often leave feeling unfulfilled because no amount of punishment can replace lost loved ones.

There is a need for alternative forms of justice that allow victims to heal without solely relying on punitive measures.

Participation and Individualized Approaches

While some victims may choose not to engage with offenders, there are ways to work with offenders individually to promote accountability and repair.

Programs exist that focus on individual offenders even if they do not wish to meet their victims, emphasizing diverse methods of achieving restorative outcomes.

Defining Restorative Justice

A comprehensive definition from the United Nations emphasizes respect for dignity and equity while promoting social harmony through healing among victims, offenders, and communities.

This definition highlights restorative justice's applicability across various contexts beyond just criminal law.

Flexibility in Application

Restorative justice should not be confined to rigid methodologies; it is better viewed as a flexible paradigm that adapts to different situations rather than forcing people into predefined processes.

Many definitions limit restorative justice by framing it merely as a methodology or process; however, it should be seen as a broader social science approach.

Challenges in Implementation

There is concern about bureaucratizing restorative practices by imposing rigid structures similar to those found in traditional penal systems.

Maintaining flexibility is crucial for effective implementation; practitioners must avoid allowing bureaucratic constraints to hinder restorative efforts.

Understanding Restorative Justice

The Nature of Time in Restorative Justice

Facilitators are not bound by strict timelines; emotional and personal factors require flexibility for individuals to process their decisions.

The aim of restorative justice is not to expedite court processes but to assist individuals in healing from the impact of crime.

Challenges with Different Types of Crimes

Serious crimes have clear victim-offender roles, while minor offenses often blur these lines, complicating resolution efforts.

In cases involving minor offenses, all parties may see themselves as victims, making it difficult to identify responsibility and resolve conflicts effectively.

Legislative Concerns and Practical Realities

New laws can be beneficial but may also introduce fears about bureaucratic inefficiencies in Spain's legal system.

Spanish legislation often lacks practical grounding, focusing too much on theoretical frameworks without considering real-world implications.

Distinctions Between Justice Models

There is a belief that traditional and restorative justice share the same goal: rebalancing consequences; however, they differ fundamentally in approach—traditional focuses on punishment while restorative seeks healing.

Traditional justice can cause more harm through punitive measures rather than addressing underlying issues caused by the offense.

Understanding Responsibility and Recognition

Victims' needs must be addressed alongside societal safety; understanding the root causes of crime is essential for effective rehabilitation.

Many legal systems require offenders to acknowledge their wrongdoing before participating in restorative processes, which may not reflect reality as shame often prevents honest admissions.

The Role of Facilitators in Restorative Processes

Facilitators must navigate complex dynamics where offenders might feel responsible yet fail to recognize the full impact of their actions on victims.

It’s crucial for facilitators to ensure that affected individuals regain agency within the restorative process while balancing offender participation appropriately.

Perspectives on Penal Systems vs. Restorative Justice

Some advocate for abolishing penal systems entirely in favor of restorative practices; however, there are concerns about society's readiness for such a shift.

A realistic view suggests that while restorative justice has merits, a functioning penal system remains necessary due to human nature and societal complexities.

Understanding Restorative Justice

The Humanization of Criminal Justice

The speaker emphasizes the importance of humanizing criminal justice, advocating for restorative practices that foster empathy and dialogue rather than punitive measures.

They propose viewing justice as a blend of legal philosophy and social science, enriched by values such as respect and accountability.

Practical Applications of Restorative Practices

The discussion highlights three restorative practices: intimate offender meetings, mediation, and community circles aimed at fostering dialogue among affected parties.

In Mexico, unique adaptations to these practices are noted, emphasizing the need for cultural sensitivity in implementing restorative justice.

Challenges in Implementation

The speaker reflects on the difficulties faced when integrating legal professionals into restorative processes, noting resistance from traditional roles within the judicial system.

They express concern about lawyers' reluctance to step outside their conventional roles during joint meetings with victims and offenders.

Shifting Perspectives on Crime and Punishment

A call is made for lawyers to act as allies rather than adversaries in restorative settings, promoting collaboration between victims and their legal representatives.

The speaker recounts experiences where initial attempts at dialogue were hindered by traditional courtroom dynamics that discourage open communication.

Empathy's Role in Preventing Crime

Emphasizing a shift from a crime-punishment paradigm to one focused on harm-repairing approaches is crucial for fostering societal empathy.

The speaker argues that encouraging good behavior should stem from empathy rather than fear of punishment, referencing Thomas Kuhn’s ideas on behavioral motivation.

Neuroscience Insights into Empathy

Discussion includes insights from neuroscience regarding psychopathy; specifically how early trauma can inhibit empathetic development in individuals.

A TED talk by Daniel Reiss is mentioned, which explores how understanding brain function can inform approaches to restorative justice.

Educational Foundations for Restorative Values

Advocating for early education in restorative values within schools and communities aims to reduce future interactions with the criminal justice system.

Understanding Restorative Justice

The Concept of Interconnectedness

The speaker discusses the application of restorative justice across various fields, emphasizing that human beings are relational and our actions impact others.

A Japanese legend about a "red thread of destiny" is referenced to illustrate how individuals are interconnected, suggesting that community is essential for well-being.

Restorative Justice Explained

The speaker highlights their focus on penal and penitentiary contexts but asserts that restorative justice principles can apply universally.

Restorative justice is defined as a different approach to crime that respects individual dignity and addresses the needs for repair after harm has occurred.

Empathy and Responsibility

Emphasis is placed on generating empathy in offenders so they can take responsibility for their actions; forgiveness is not the primary goal but may be a beneficial outcome.

The speaker argues against equating restorative justice with reconciliation or forgiveness, noting that personal beliefs about forgiveness should not dictate outcomes.

Understanding Forgiveness

Forgiveness is described as a personal journey rather than an obligatory step in restorative processes; it should not be forced upon individuals.

An example from childhood illustrates how saying "I'm sorry" without understanding the impact of one's actions lacks sincerity; true apology involves recognizing harm done.

Practical Applications in Daily Life

The principles of restorative justice can be applied in everyday interactions, promoting accountability and reparative actions when conflicts arise.

Most people find liberation through forgiveness, which helps restore balance in relationships rather than adhering strictly to religious interpretations of forgiveness.

Clarifying Mediation vs. Restorative Practices

Misconceptions About Mediation

There’s confusion surrounding terms like "mediation" within criminal contexts; true mediation involves mutual conflict resolution between equal parties.

In contrast, restorative practices address power imbalances where one party (the victim) has been harmed by another (the offender).

Distinguishing Between Approaches

The speaker critiques the term "mediación penal," arguing it misrepresents the nature of restorative practices which focus on addressing harm rather than mediating disputes.

In restorative settings, facilitators maintain neutrality while ensuring both victim and offender have space to express their needs without compromising fairness.

Addressing Power Imbalances

It’s crucial to recognize that victims do not need to concede anything during these discussions; they deserve full acknowledgment of their experiences without pressure to forgive or mediate.

Understanding Restorative Justice and Mediation

The Controversy of Mediation in Gender Violence Cases

The topic of balancing the consequences of harm is highly debated, particularly regarding Spain's law against gender violence, which prohibits mediation between abusers and victims to avoid treating them as equals.

This prohibition stems from a confusion of concepts; some believe that restorative justice aims for private resolution rather than addressing the need for justice.

Distinguishing Between Mediation and Restorative Justice

There is a clear distinction between mediation and restorative justice, yet many programs confuse the two. Courses often focus on conflict mediation instead of the core principles of restorative justice.

While there exists a tool called penal mediation, it lacks the restorative focus necessary to reduce recidivism effectively.

Recidivism and Qualitative Outcomes

The goal should not solely be about reducing recidivism but also about fostering qualitative outcomes where individuals take responsibility for their actions.

High recidivism rates raise questions about expectations placed on practitioners who are achieving qualitative results rather than quantitative ones.

Community Impact and Victim Empowerment

The speaker emphasizes a desire for societal improvement by empowering victims to move beyond their victimhood while holding offenders accountable.

A cohesive society benefits when individuals understand the impact of their crimes on families and communities, leading to better rehabilitation prospects.

Misconceptions About Restorative Justice Applications

There is skepticism surrounding statistics related to restorative justice; qualitative measures can sometimes provide more meaningful insights into its effectiveness than mere numbers.

Many misconceptions exist regarding restorative practices being limited to minor offenses; they can also serve as complementary approaches in serious cases or during incarceration periods.

Legal Framework and Institutional Confusion

In Spain, certain legal institutions like plea agreements expedite judicial processes but often exclude victim participation, leading to misunderstandings about restorative practices' potential benefits.

A qualified approach to plea agreements could incorporate restorative elements if they involve recognition of harm and commitment to repair it, thus enhancing human-centered justice within existing legal frameworks.

Understanding Restorative Justice in Minor Offenses

The Concept of Minor Offenses and Public Perception

The speaker emphasizes the need for citizens to understand minor offenses, as misconceptions may lead to unjust reproach against offenders.

In Belgium, over 90% of restorative processes occur while offenders are incarcerated, indicating societal readiness issues regarding serious crimes.

Limitations of Current Penal Systems

The speaker argues that restorative justice is not a panacea for the penal system's shortcomings but can improve it.

Acknowledges the existing penal system's inefficiencies and advocates for integrating restorative justice practices.

Restorative Interventions by Judges

Judges can implement restorative approaches even when direct victim-offender meetings are unfeasible, such as when victims are unwilling or unavailable.

An example is provided where a young offender involved with drugs could be sentenced to community service instead of traditional punishment.

Community Service vs. Reflective Restoration

The effectiveness of community service depends on whether it encourages reflection on the harm caused; mere labor without context may not foster understanding.

If community service lacks connection to the offense, it risks reinforcing negative perceptions rather than promoting constructive social behavior.

Voluntary Participation in Restorative Justice

Emphasizes that participation in restorative justice must be voluntary; offenders should have options that allow them to engage meaningfully with their communities.

Engaging with homeless individuals affected by addiction can provide valuable insights and reflections for young offenders about their actions' impacts.

Broader Applications of Restorative Practices

Highlights how exposure to real-life stories during community work can shift perspectives on drug use and its consequences.

Suggestion that legal professionals adopt restorative approaches in their practice rather than strictly adversarial methods.

Methodologies in Restorative Justice

Discusses various methodologies within restorative justice, including victim-offender meetings and circles aimed at fostering dialogue and resolution.

Advocates for tailored programs addressing specific conflicts or issues within communities, emphasizing long-term objectives beyond individual cases.

Implementing Preventive Programs

Proposes developing programs focused on conflict prevention among youth through dialogue and responsibility training.

Circles serve as versatile tools for teaching conflict resolution skills among peers, enhancing communal relationships.

Restorative Practices in Criminal Justice

The Impact of Media on Perception of Crime

Discussion on how media coverage can amplify feelings of insecurity, creating a distorted perception of crime.

Reference to a tragic case where a released prisoner committed further crimes, highlighting the flaws in the justice system and the expertise involved in addressing such issues.

Objectives of Restorative Justice Programs

Emphasis on reducing recidivism as a primary goal, alongside developing individual plans for offenders to repair harm caused by their actions.

Introduction of methodologies like restorative circles aimed at fostering community healing and offender accountability.

Creating Restorative Communities

Advocacy for broader application of restorative practices beyond individual cases to entire communities and workplaces.

Differentiation between mediation and penal mediation as tools within restorative justice frameworks.

Understanding Offender Perspectives

Insight into the mindset of offenders, illustrating how some rationalize their actions based on perceived injustices against larger entities like banks.

Exploration of personal backgrounds that lead individuals to criminal behavior, emphasizing emotional neglect over socioeconomic status.

Addressing Root Causes of Crime

Call for deeper engagement with underlying causes leading to criminal behavior rather than merely focusing on punitive measures.

Importance of collaboration among institutions to provide support systems that address these root causes effectively.

Community Support and Rehabilitation

Highlighting the necessity for community resources and institutional support in aiding rehabilitation efforts post-incarceration.

Mentioning partnerships with organizations like Caritas Spain that help integrate offenders back into society through meaningful work opportunities.

Future Aspirations for Restorative Justice

Hope expressed for restorative justice's potential to address damages caused by crime while empowering victims with a voice in the process.

Recognition that victims should have the right to express their experiences and influence outcomes within restorative frameworks.

Understanding Victim Expectations in Justice Systems

The Discrepancy Between Victim Expectations and Legal Realities

In Spain, victims often have high expectations when participating in the justice process, believing they will be able to share their experiences fully. However, they frequently encounter a system focused more on legal facts than emotional truths.

Victims expect to express how they felt during the incident but are often met with questions that prioritize legal definitions over personal narratives, leading to disappointment.

Many victims realize too late that their emotional truths are not valued in court; instead, the focus is on factual recounting of events.

Facilitating Restorative Justice

Ideal Qualifications for Facilitators

Effective facilitators of restorative justice should possess a belief in their work and appropriate training. This includes backgrounds in law, psychology, or social work.

A multidisciplinary approach is beneficial; criminologists may fit well due to their broad educational background encompassing various relevant fields.

Continuous Learning and Adaptation

Practitioners must continually learn about different aspects of restorative justice. Reading materials like "The Little Book of Restorative Justice" can provide insights into its application in hate crimes and marginalized communities.

The Role of Information and Empowerment for Victims

Importance of Clear Communication

Providing clear information empowers victims by making them feel part of the justice process rather than mere witnesses. This empowerment is crucial for their engagement.

Understanding Terminology

The term "restorative" encompasses more than just repair; it involves dialogue and understanding between parties involved. It emphasizes relational dynamics rather than solely financial reparations.

Challenges within Traditional Justice Frameworks

Misconceptions About Financial Reparations

There is a misconception that victims who renounce financial compensation are not satisfied with outcomes. This reflects an outdated view that equates satisfaction with monetary restitution.

Transformational Potential of Restorative Practices

Restorative practices aim to transform offenders' perspectives by reconnecting them with their humanity rather than merely reverting them to previous states before offenses occurred.

Conclusion: Moving Beyond Traditional Views

Embracing Change

Advocates believe restorative justice can help individuals recognize their mistakes without labeling them as criminals permanently, fostering personal growth and societal reintegration.

Understanding the Impact of Unresolved Trauma

The Role of Personal Stories in Healing

The speaker emphasizes that individuals are shaped by their untold stories, and without acknowledging these narratives, respect for victims is compromised.

Suffering from any form of harm, whether severe or minor, becomes a part of one's life history, making it challenging to return to a pre-trauma state.

The analogy of Japanese pottery repair illustrates how trauma can lead to transformation; while individuals may not return to their original state, they can be dignified through healing.

Values in Restorative Justice

A group aimed at establishing common values for restorative practices found it difficult due to cultural differences but agreed on respect and responsibility as foundational principles.

Respect is crucial as it fosters self-respect among individuals, while responsibility connects rights with accountability—an essential lesson for children today.

Understanding Restorative Practices

Restorative justice transcends mere meetings; it's about managing the impact of offenses and addressing the resulting harm effectively.

Various forms of restorative interventions exist across community settings, schools, workplaces, and correctional facilities.

Continuum of Restorative Approaches

There exists a spectrum within restorative practices ranging from minimal interventions to comprehensive approaches involving all parties affected by an offense.

Fully restorative actions involve gatherings that include victims and communities; less intensive methods might be employed by judges based on specific cases.

Addressing Challenges in Serious Offenses

In serious crimes like robbery with violence, preparatory meetings require more time and careful consideration before proceeding with joint sessions.

Facilitators must be adequately trained before handling serious offenses to avoid frustration during the process.

Victim Expectations in Restorative Justice

Ensuring victim safety is paramount; facilitators must clarify meeting structures beforehand to alleviate concerns about potential risks.

It's vital for facilitators to manage victim expectations realistically. If a victim seeks an apology that cannot be guaranteed, this should prevent them from participating in joint discussions.

Discussion on Joint Meetings and Victim Responsibility

Importance of Joint Meetings

The speaker emphasizes the need for joint meetings to avoid delays, highlighting that victims often feel neglected if these meetings are postponed.

Key variables in these discussions include victim safety, expectations, and offender responsibility. These factors must be prioritized during preparatory meetings.

Timing for Restorative Justice Implementation

A question arises regarding the appropriate timing for implementing restorative justice in cases of sexual assault.

The speaker shares a personal experience where a victim actively sought mediation, illustrating the importance of victim agency in these processes.

Readiness of Victims and Offenders

It is noted that victims may not always be ready to engage in restorative practices immediately after an incident due to emotional trauma.

The speaker discusses the necessity of allowing time for victims to heal before approaching them about restorative options.

Challenges with Adolescent Offenders

Parental Influence on Offender Recognition

Parents often struggle with accepting their child's actions, which complicates the process of encouraging offenders to take responsibility.

The discussion highlights how shame plays a significant role in preventing adolescents from acknowledging their behavior.

Time Required for Effective Engagement

Engaging adolescent offenders requires patience and creativity; initial responses may be defensive or dismissive.

Building empathy is crucial, as it can help facilitate dialogue between victims and offenders over time.

Facilitator vs. Mediator: Clarifying Roles

Distinction Between Terms

There is confusion between mediators and facilitators within restorative practices; clarity on roles is essential for effective communication.

The speaker reflects on personal experiences where terminology led to misunderstandings about the nature of workshops conducted.

Preference for Terminology

The term "facilitator" is preferred over "mediator" because it better represents the role of guiding dialogue rather than merely resolving conflicts.

Emphasizing facilitation helps differentiate restorative practices from traditional mediation approaches focused solely on conflict resolution.

Discussion on Restorative Justice and Mediation

The Nature of Mediation in Restorative Justice

The speaker emphasizes that mediation is not inherently bad; rather, there is a misconception in their country that if something isn't labeled as restorative justice, it lacks value.

They express frustration over the misuse of terms like "mediation," highlighting a disconnect between terminology and actual practices within the justice system.

Current Social Issues and Adaptation

The discussion shifts to modern issues such as online aggression and social media violence, suggesting that these contemporary challenges require adaptive approaches in restorative practices.

There are calls for addressing situations that cause harm but may not yet be classified as crimes, advocating for restorative practices even in non-criminal contexts.

Protocol Development for Specific Crimes

The speaker proposes creating protocols specifically tailored for cybercrimes and online harassment, indicating a need for specialized knowledge among practitioners.

They stress the importance of understanding the unique characteristics of different types of crime (e.g., hate crimes against LGBTQ+ individuals or racial minorities), which should inform how restorative processes are designed.

Community Engagement and Acknowledgment

Acknowledgment is given to participants from various locations, emphasizing the collective effort towards advancing restorative justice principles.

Gratitude is expressed towards Dr. Virginia Domingo de la Fuente for her contributions to the workshop, highlighting community support and recognition.

Closing Remarks on Restorative Justice Practices

The speaker shares heartfelt thanks from attendees, noting positive feedback about the clarity and effectiveness of Dr. Domingo's presentation.

They encourage ongoing engagement with restorative justice efforts at all levels while expressing personal enthusiasm for collaborative work across borders.