Escala 6x1: aprovado na CCJC relatório que pede fim da jornada 6x1 - 22/04/2026

Name: Escala 6x1: aprovado na CCJC relatório que pede fim da jornada 6x1 - 22/04/2026
Uploaded: 2026-04-22T20:19:10.000Z
Duration: 4 h 2 min 24 s

18th Extraordinary Deliberative Meeting of the CCJ

Opening Remarks and Agenda

The meeting is officially opened by the president, confirming a quorum for the 18th extraordinary meeting of the Commission on Constitution and Justice and Citizenship held on April 22, 2026.

The minutes from the previous meeting (17th extraordinary) are approved without reading, as per Act 123/2020, Article 5.

Discussion on Procedural Agreement

Deputy Rubens suggests a procedural agreement to consult with the plenary regarding a specific PEC (Proposta de Emenda à Constituição). He expresses concern about time constraints due to an upcoming agenda.

He proposes reducing discussion time from the regimental 15 minutes to 5 minutes for all members to express their positions efficiently while allowing additional time for leadership comments if necessary.

Time Management in Discussions

Acknowledging concerns about limited discussion time, another deputy argues that while five minutes may be short, it’s essential to adhere to regimental rules unless more time is needed for thorough discussions.

The president agrees to set a five-minute limit but allows any member who wishes to speak longer to do so with full support from the presidency.

Introduction of PEC 221/2019

Item one on the agenda is PEC 221/2019 proposed by Reginaldo Lopes, which aims to reduce weekly working hours to 36 over ten years. The report has been read by rapporteur Paulo Azi and there’s a request for postponement of discussion noted.

Importance of Approving PEC

Deputy S Bonfim emphasizes that today is crucial for approving the admissibility of this PEC aimed at reducing work hours in Brazil, highlighting societal mobilization around this issue. She acknowledges various stakeholders involved in advocating for this proposal.

She notes that public support exceeds 70%, indicating strong backing from Brazilian society despite political resistance from some party leaders against addressing this demand effectively. This reflects broader societal pressure influencing legislative action.

Historical Context and Economic Arguments

Drawing parallels with historical debates around work hour reductions dating back approximately 80 years during CLT establishment discussions, she critiques recurring economic fears associated with such changes—fears deemed unfounded based on current evidence suggesting potential job creation instead of loss due to reduced hours.

She argues that increasing salaries through reduced working hours can stimulate consumer spending and improve overall economic conditions rather than harm them, challenging traditional economic narratives surrounding labor reforms in Brazil.

Economic Changes and Labor Rights in Brazil

Historical Context of Employment and Economic Policy

The most significant job creation and income generation in Brazil occurred during periods of increased state investment, particularly under Lula's second year and the early Dilma administration.

A shift in economic logic began with the Temer government, continuing into Bolsonaro's administration, impacting labor rights and employment conditions.

Importance of Workers in Economic Discussions

Recognizing workers as essential to economic discussions is crucial; they are the ones who generate wealth both nationally and globally.

The economy cannot be viewed solely through a management lens that ignores human labor; it must include considerations for workers' rights and well-being.

Legislative Developments on Work Hours

The OECD data suggests that countries reducing work hours have seen increases in productivity and decreases in unemployment, indicating positive effects on both population welfare and national economies.

A historic vote on a constitutional amendment (PEC) aimed at reducing work hours is taking place, marking a significant moment since the last change occurred 38 years ago. This reflects ongoing societal demands for better working conditions.

Evolution of Labor Rights in Brazil

Key milestones in Brazilian labor history include:

Introduction of 15 days of vacation (1925), which was initially met with resistance but ultimately did not harm the economy.

Establishment of minimum wage (1936) faced similar opposition yet contributed positively to economic modernization.

Implementation of labor laws including the CLT (Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho) ensuring worker rights like paid vacations (30 days). These changes were also met with skepticism but proved beneficial over time.

Current Push for Reduced Work Hours

There is an urgent call to end the "6x1" work schedule, advocating instead for more humane working conditions that allow workers time for family life, especially addressing challenges faced by women balancing multiple roles.

Global trends indicate a movement towards reduced work schedules such as "5x2" or "4x3," suggesting that this change is inevitable; the focus should be on how to implement it effectively within Brazil's context.

Discussion on Work Hours and Family Impact

Historical Context and Current Perspectives

Deputy Pastor Henrique Vieira expresses gratitude for the opportunity to discuss the end of the 6x1 work schedule, emphasizing its historical significance.

He describes the 6x1 work schedule as unethical and inhumane, citing reports of exhaustion, anxiety, and a decline in quality of life from workers.

The combination of long commutes and six-day workweeks leads to physical and emotional burnout, with little time left for genuine rest or recovery.

Ethical Considerations

Vieira argues that this work structure is degrading and robs individuals of their joy in life, highlighting an ethical obligation to respect people's well-being.

He notes that the 6x1 schedule negatively impacts family bonds, particularly affecting parental involvement in children's education.

Call to Action

Emphasizing support for families, he urges fellow deputies to vote against the 6x1 schedule as it contributes to family disintegration.

Vieira stresses that worker mobilization has historically driven change, asserting that achieving a reduction in working hours without salary cuts is a just cause.

Mobilization for Change

Reflections on Past Efforts

Deputy Tarcío Moto shares his happiness about ongoing discussions regarding labor reform after previous setbacks in 2023 due to lack of popular mobilization.

He credits grassroots movements like "Vida Além do Trabalho" (Life Beyond Work), which have energized public support for reducing working hours.

Historical Significance of Labor Movements

Moto reflects on historical labor struggles dating back to the Industrial Revolution when workers fought for reasonable working conditions including an eight-hour day.

He emphasizes that early labor unions were pivotal in advocating against child labor and demanding humane working conditions.

Personal Connection

Moto shares a personal story about his daughter currently working under the challenging 6x1 schedule, illustrating how these issues affect families directly.

Working Conditions and Labor Rights Discussion

The Struggles of the Working Class

A speaker describes their daughter's exhausting work schedule, highlighting that she cannot even spend Easter Sunday with family due to her job demands.

The daughter works from 7 AM to 3 PM daily, with only one day off a week, illustrating the toll this takes on her health and well-being.

The speaker emphasizes that while their daughter is privileged enough to attend university soon, most workers endure grueling schedules out of necessity.

There is a critique of liberal views on capitalism as a realm of freedom, arguing that many workers face exploitative conditions instead.

A call for legislative action is made to redefine work as a source of human dignity rather than exploitation.

Legislative Proposals for Labor Reform

The speaker advocates for reducing the workweek to 40 hours and ensuring at least two days off per week as essential steps toward improving worker conditions.

Another speaker acknowledges the progress being made in Congress against opposition from certain political factions regarding labor rights reforms.

Emphasis is placed on how current legislation aims to address the needs of exhausted workers who lack time for family or personal care.

Historical context is provided by referencing past reforms under previous administrations that negatively impacted worker benefits and pensions.

Concerns are raised about proposals from opposing parties that threaten further reductions in worker rights and benefits.

Commitment to Worker Welfare

The discussion highlights the need for compensating workers who have already suffered losses due to previous government policies affecting retirement benefits.

Criticism is directed towards political opponents advocating for new labor reforms perceived as detrimental to worker rights and welfare.

A clear distinction is drawn between current government commitments aimed at supporting workers versus those proposing austerity measures affecting pensions and wages.

The importance of maintaining salary levels while reducing working hours without loss of pay is emphasized as crucial for enhancing quality of life for workers.

Final remarks stress the necessity of providing more free time for families while ensuring fair compensation remains intact amidst ongoing discussions about labor reform.

Discussion on Brazilian Workers' Rights and Employment Policies

Concerns Over Changes to Worker Benefits

The speaker highlights the negative impact of changes made to workers' rights, particularly regarding pension adjustments and inflation affecting minimum wage.

Acknowledgment of various absent deputies during the discussion, indicating a lack of participation in critical debates about worker rights.

Importance of Detailed Debate

The speaker emphasizes the need for thorough discussions on proposed policies, appreciating the relator's report that outlines global debates and developments.

Points out that previous requests for more time to discuss the PEC (Proposed Constitutional Amendment) were beneficial for national dialogue on differing viewpoints.

Work Schedule Adjustments and Their Implications

The speaker notes that many workers desire reduced work hours (from 6x1 to 5x2), which could enhance their quality of life without being inherently problematic.

Raises concerns about who will bear the financial burden if work hours are reduced while maintaining salaries, suggesting potential deficits for employers.

Economic Impact on Employers

Discusses how reducing work hours could lead to a 22% increase in costs for employers, questioning whether these costs will be passed onto consumers or absorbed by businesses.

Uses hospitals as an example where reduced working hours would necessitate hiring additional staff, complicating financial sustainability for such institutions.

Challenges Faced by Small Businesses

Highlights that micro and small enterprises generate 80% of new formal jobs in Brazil; increased labor costs could threaten their viability.

Emphasizes competitive disadvantages faced by Brazilian businesses due to high operational costs compared to international competitors.

Need for Compensation Mechanisms

Calls attention to the absence of compensation strategies within the PEC or related projects, stressing that any reduction in working hours must consider employer burdens.

Advocates for broader discussions within special committees to address compensation needs adequately before finalizing legislative changes.

Discussion on Employment and Legislative Proposals

Concerns About Job Losses

The speaker expresses concern over the rapid approval of a project that could lead to a potential loss of 1.2 million jobs in Brazil, emphasizing the need for thorough debate and alternative solutions.

Economic Impact of Legislation

The speaker disagrees with claims that new legislation will create more jobs, arguing that the current economic conditions in Brazil will increase costs for employers by 22%, making job creation unrealistic.

Challenges Faced by Various Sectors

Recent changes to payroll tax exemptions have negatively impacted 17 sectors, leading to increased costs passed onto consumers; however, these exemptions may not benefit all segments equally.

Importance of Small Businesses

Emphasizes the necessity for alternatives that support small and medium enterprises, highlighting their role in job creation and community sustenance.

Call for Collaborative Solutions

Advocates for collective efforts among stakeholders to find solutions that maintain employment levels while addressing proposed changes from a 6x1 work schedule to a 5x2 model.

Legislative Process and Historical Context

Introduction of Proposed Changes

Acknowledges the long-awaited discussion regarding the PEC aimed at abolishing the 6x1 work schedule, noting its initial proposal dates back to 2019.

Political Dynamics Surrounding Legislation

Highlights how political support has accelerated legislative processes, particularly after backing from President Lula, which has led to increased urgency in voting on this matter.

Addressing Opposition Arguments

Critiques opposing views claiming job losses due to this PEC as fearmongering reminiscent of past arguments against labor rights advancements like paid vacations or minimum wage laws.

Recognition of Key Contributors

Thanks key figures involved in drafting and supporting the PEC, including Deputy Paulo Azi for his technical approach and balanced perspective during discussions.

Focus on Admissibility Rather Than Merit

Clarifies that current discussions are focused solely on admissibility rather than merit; emphasizes that rejecting this PEC would contradict established labor standards recognized internationally.

Workplace Rights and the 40-Hour Work Week

The Need for a 40-Hour Work Week

The speaker emphasizes that after many years, it is finally time to define a standard work week of 40 hours, highlighting the importance of work in dignifying human life.

There is a call for workers to have time for leisure, health care, and family rather than living solely to work. The modern world has advanced significantly, with most countries adopting shorter work weeks.

Voting against the proposed constitutional amendment (PEC) would be seen as an unjust legal maneuver. The speaker urges swift action on this matter as it has been discussed extensively already.

Historical Context and Legislative Progress

Acknowledgment of past struggles with the "6 by 1" work schedule; the goal is to ensure that this outdated model becomes a part of history as Brazil moves towards a more humane working environment.

Recognition of key figures in the legislative process who have contributed to advancing this proposal over time. It reflects on how long discussions have taken place regarding labor rights.

Sovereignty and Workers' Rights

Emphasizes that true national sovereignty involves caring for its citizens through access to fundamental rights and public policies such as education and healthcare.

Advocates for ensuring all Brazilians can live dignified lives while exercising their citizenship rights effectively within a structured work week.

Economic Considerations

Discusses how maintaining an appropriate daily or weekly workload allows individuals to engage fully in civic duties and benefit from public services.

Highlights the connection between labor rights and social justice, referencing Christian teachings about supporting workers’ causes.

Vision for Brazil's Future

Expresses hope for Brazil becoming a global reference point where everyone can live with dignity while also supporting national entrepreneurship.

Stresses that economic growth should not come at the expense of worker rights; both must coexist harmoniously for sustainable development.

Urgency in Legislative Action

Calls attention to historical delays in addressing labor issues since discussions began back in 1988 regarding reducing working hours from 48 to 40 per week.

Points out that there are significant mental health implications tied to excessive workloads, urging immediate action on legislation aimed at improving worker conditions.

Arguments Against Workers' Rights

Historical Context of Labor Rights

The speaker draws parallels between current arguments against workers' rights and historical justifications for slavery, suggesting that claims about economic collapse and inflation are recycled rhetoric.

They emphasize that the same arguments were used during the drafting of Brazil's constitution, indicating a persistent elitist attitude towards labor rights.

Critique of Elitism

The speaker criticizes an elite class that dismisses workers' rights, arguing they perpetuate a cycle of oppression by claiming that granting rights would worsen conditions for workers.

They reference the historical context of slavery in Brazil, highlighting how this elite benefited from exploitation without acknowledging the suffering caused.

Current Labor Conditions

The discussion shifts to contemporary issues faced by Brazilian workers, particularly women who bear additional burdens due to societal expectations regarding domestic responsibilities.

A statistic is presented showing over 70% public support for reducing work hours, emphasizing the need for change in labor practices to improve health outcomes.

Health Implications of Work Hours

The speaker warns about rising health risks associated with long working hours, citing a 60% increase in work-related accidents as evidence of unsustainable labor practices.

They argue that productivity increases when work hours are reduced, countering the notion that longer hours equate to greater output.

Legislative Support for Change

Acknowledgment is given to ongoing legislative efforts aimed at reforming work schedules to promote better mental health among workers.

The importance of rest and recovery is emphasized as essential for worker well-being and productivity; thus advocating against the traditional 6x1 work schedule.

Personal Experiences and Advocacy

Personal anecdotes illustrate the challenges faced by those working under demanding schedules; these experiences underscore the urgency for reform in labor laws.

Statistics on worker illness due to excessive workloads highlight significant economic costs associated with poor labor conditions, reinforcing calls for legislative action.

This structured summary captures key discussions from the transcript while providing timestamps linked directly to specific points made throughout.

Discussion on Work Hours and Employee Well-being

The Unsustainable Work Model

The current work model is deemed unsustainable for workers, emphasizing the need for a healthier balance between work and rest to enhance productivity.

A reduction in working days can lead to better health outcomes for employees, which ultimately benefits employers through increased productivity.

Economic Arguments for Reduced Working Hours

Employers can save costs by reducing the number of sick employees, suggesting that discussions should focus on this economic perspective.

The constitutionality of proposed changes to work hours is under scrutiny, with claims that a 6x1 schedule violates fundamental rights such as health and leisure.

International Examples of Reduced Work Hours

Countries like Iceland have successfully reduced work hours from 40 to 35/36 per week, resulting in improved employee well-being and productivity.

Japan's corporate experiment showed a 40% increase in productivity when reducing the workweek while maintaining total hours worked.

Impact of Legislation on Employment

France's legal change from a 39-hour to a 35-hour workweek led to the creation of 350,000 new jobs alongside increased hourly productivity.

Germany's trial reduction from 40 hours to between 28 and 32 resulted in significant job retention among younger workers seeking better quality of life.

Addressing Youth Expectations

Young professionals are increasingly prioritizing quality of life over traditional employment structures; legislation aimed at reducing working hours aligns with these values.

Emphasizing cultural experiences and personal growth resonates with today's youth, making legislative changes regarding work hours crucial for attracting talent.

The Importance of Legislative Changes in Work Schedules

Overview of Proposed Constitutional Amendments

Discussion centers around PEC 221/2019 aimed at abolishing the exhausting 6x1 work schedule while promoting more sustainable practices.

Economic Implications

The proposed changes are not expected to raise service or product prices since many workers already operate under a more favorable 5x2 schedule.

Personal Experiences Highlighting Exhaustion

Personal anecdotes illustrate the mental and physical toll associated with the demanding nature of a 6x1 schedule, stressing its impact on family and social life.

Discussion on Work Hours and Labor Conditions

Advocating for a 5x2 Work Schedule

The speaker emphasizes that transitioning to a 5x2 work schedule will enhance the quality of life for workers, highlighting the urgency of this change.

There is a call to reduce working hours from 40 to 36 per week, arguing that this can be achieved without harming the economy, countering past fears about reduced hours leading to business failures.

Historical Context and Economic Arguments

The speaker reflects on historical claims regarding work hour reductions (from 48 to 44 hours), asserting that such changes did not lead to business collapses as predicted by employers.

Drawing from personal experience as both an employee and employer, the speaker argues that better working conditions lead to increased productivity and enthusiasm among workers.

Ethical Considerations in Labor Practices

Acknowledging the detrimental effects of exhausting work schedules on health, the speaker stresses that excessive workloads harm both employees' dignity and public health resources.

The argument is made for ending the 6x1 work schedule based on legal, economic, ethical, and human relationship perspectives.

Human Dignity and Productivity

The importance of maintaining human dignity through reasonable work hours is emphasized; overworking reduces humanity to mere biological restoration rather than fostering creativity or collaboration.

The discussion highlights how women disproportionately bear domestic responsibilities after long work weeks, leading to further exhaustion and health issues.

Enhancing Workplace Relationships

Stressful working conditions hinder collaborative relationships among colleagues; improved rest leads to better interactions and productivity at work.

Employers are encouraged to recognize that investing in worker well-being ultimately benefits company profitability through enhanced productivity.

Conclusion of Discussions

The speaker concludes with a vision for transforming labor relations into more humane practices that respect individual contributions while benefiting society as a whole.

Personal Reflections on Work Schedules

Personal Experience with Work Hours

A new speaker shares their personal history with a demanding work schedule (6x1), emphasizing the need for balance between professional obligations and personal life.

Discussion on PEC and Labor Rights

Critique of the Proposed PEC

The speaker argues that the proposed PEC does not effectively address labor issues, as it maintains the existing informal work structure (6 for 1 scale).

They express skepticism about the intentions of the authors, Reginaldo Lopes and Érica Hilton, suggesting that a simple project of law would suffice to reduce working hours instead of a lengthy PEC process.

The speaker believes that using a PEC is merely a political strategy to prolong discussions rather than genuinely seeking to improve workers' conditions.

Historical Context and Promises

They reference past promises made during the "PEC das domésticas," which claimed improved rights for domestic workers but resulted in increased informality instead.

The speaker criticizes Érica Hilton's absence from crucial discussions, highlighting her lack of commitment to advocating for worker improvements.

Economic Considerations

A call for genuine economic reforms is made, emphasizing tax cuts and increased purchasing power as real solutions for improving workers' lives.

The discussion shifts towards cutting government spending as necessary for tax reductions, noting reluctance among parliament members to give up personal benefits.

Political Integrity and Accountability

The speaker emphasizes their willingness to lose votes rather than compromise their principles or mislead voters regarding labor rights.

They predict that after elections, workers will realize they were misled by populist rhetoric surrounding the PEC.

Debate on Political Strategies

Perspectives on Political Alliances

Fausto Pinato acknowledges respect for differing opinions while expressing concerns over political strategies resembling "bread and circuses."

He critiques both left-wing and right-wing approaches in Brazilian politics, suggesting they often fail to address core issues affecting citizens.

Social Welfare Programs

Pinato discusses social welfare programs like Bolsa Família, arguing they have become tools for vote-buying rather than genuine support systems.

Call for Honest Debate

He stresses the importance of honest dialogue within parliament about unemployment and labor rights without resorting to populism or deceitful tactics.

Discussion on Labor Rights and Political Accountability

The Role of Land and Technology in Brazil's Future

The speaker criticizes the ultraright's approval of land sales to China, emphasizing that Brazil needs to focus on technology and job creation for its sovereignty.

Questions arise about whether emerging countries like China and India are engaging in similar political rhetoric or genuinely working towards their citizens' welfare.

Challenges Faced by Workers

Highlights the struggles of entrepreneurs who face heavy taxation, strict regulations, and a lack of willing labor force, as many prefer informal employment.

Accuses politicians of being irresponsible for not addressing these issues while focusing on electoral demagoguery.

Critique of Right-Wing Politicians

Points out the absence of right-wing parliamentarians during critical discussions, labeling them as cowardly for avoiding accountability.

Critiques Governor Zema for his stance against work schedules that exploit workers, noting his privileged background.

Personal Experiences with Work Conditions

Argues that some politicians lack real-world work experience, making it easy for them to support exploitative labor practices without understanding their impact.

Calls out specific politicians like Kim Cataguiri and Flávio Bolsonaro for their disconnect from the realities faced by everyday workers.

Legislative Progress Towards Worker Rights

Emphasizes the importance of advancing worker rights through legislative measures that protect labor conditions rather than rolling back protections established in previous reforms.

Expresses optimism about potential victories over extreme right ideologies that disregard workers' rights.

Response from Opposing Politicians

An opposing politician challenges claims made regarding work experiences and productivity within parliament, suggesting hypocrisy among critics.

Defends the need for serious discussion around labor laws while criticizing inaccuracies presented by opponents regarding proposed legislation.

Discussion on Admissibility and Worker Rights

Introduction to the Debate

The discussion centers around the admissibility of a proposed constitutional amendment (PEC), emphasizing that merits will be addressed later.

A call for responsibility in legislative actions is made, highlighting concerns about potential job losses and economic downturns.

Contributions from the Liberal Party

The speaker asserts that the Liberal Party has significant contributions to make regarding modern labor relations, advocating for a system based on hours worked and received.

There is an intention to improve what is described as a "horrible" PEC from the current government, with promises of responsible engagement in discussions.

Government's Role and Worker Support

The government is urged to implement compensatory measures for sectors adversely affected by changes in legislation. Solutions will be presented when discussing merits.

The speaker claims alignment with worker interests, distancing themselves from electoral opportunism amidst poor governmental approval ratings. They criticize past governance for neglecting workers' needs over 20 years.

Modernization of Labor Relations

Emphasis is placed on the need to modernize labor relations in Brazil, advocating for autonomy for both workers and employers through flexible work arrangements.

Criticism is directed at outdated union practices that no longer serve workers effectively, suggesting that unions have become obsolete in their representation roles.

Seriousness of Political Discourse

A commitment to serious debate without being influenced by electoral politics is reiterated, aiming to protect jobs and businesses while addressing worker rights responsibly.

Counterarguments Against Electoral Opportunism

Addressing Misconceptions

A call for brevity in political discourse emphasizes avoiding falsehoods regarding President Lula's actions during his term related to worker support initiatives like increasing aid amounts temporarily before elections.

Legislative Intentions

The speaker defends recent legislative proposals aimed at reducing work hours to enhance family time, countering accusations of political maneuvering with factual assertions about legislative intent focused on worker welfare.

Historical Context

Reference is made to historical labor laws established decades ago which are now being criticized; this highlights a disconnect between past achievements and current criticisms against them as harmful or regressive towards workers' rights.

This structured summary captures key points from the transcript while providing timestamps for easy reference back to specific moments within the discussion.

Reducing Work Hours: A Constitutional Proposal

Overview of the Proposed Changes

The proposal aims to reduce the workweek from 48 hours to 44 hours, establishing a constitutional limit for collective agreements to further lower it to 40 hours in specific sectors.

Emphasizes the need for legal security for all entrepreneurs, particularly vulnerable workers who earn less and require constitutional changes for better working conditions.

Highlights that productivity is a significant challenge; advancements in technology could increase productivity by up to 20%, benefiting various sectors including agriculture.

Impact on Workers and Society

Discusses the reduction of informal labor from 55% in 2018 to an expected 36% by 2026, indicating a positive trend towards formalization despite challenges.

Notes that reducing work hours will positively impact both workers' families and employers through increased productivity, addressing issues like mental health-related absences from work.

Personal Experience and Advocacy

Shares personal anecdotes about working long hours since adolescence, emphasizing the struggles faced by many workers who cannot negotiate better terms due to their circumstances.

Advocates for the rights of over 31 million workers who lack time for education or skill development due to excessive work demands.

The Role of Collective Bargaining

Legislative Context

Acknowledges gratitude towards colleagues while transitioning discussions towards legislative responsibilities regarding worker rights and protections.

Importance of Modern Negotiation Models

Commends efficient handling of legislative processes while recognizing the urgency surrounding worker negotiations within modern contexts.

Asserts that those who work hardest often earn the least, particularly affecting women and youth engaged in domestic duties or educational pursuits.

Challenges with Current Agreements

Points out that current collective agreements are often insufficient for protecting low-income workers, necessitating legislative intervention.

Calls attention to societal demands for improved productivity gains through modernized workplace practices while ensuring fair treatment of all employees.

Discussion on Constitutional Amendment and Workers' Rights

Importance of Constitutional Treatment

The speaker emphasizes the necessity for the matter to be addressed within the constitutional text, arguing that it provides legal security for a significant issue.

Economic Impacts and Legislative Collaboration

Acknowledges that once the discussion shifts to the merits of the proposal, economic impacts must be considered. The speaker expresses hope for collaboration among workers, entrepreneurs, and government to create balanced legislation.

Recognition of Key Contributors

The speaker congratulates key figures involved in the legislative process, particularly highlighting Deputy Érica Hilton's commitment and involvement in discussions both inside and outside legislative settings.

Historical Significance of Current Proceedings

The speaker describes today's events as historic for parliament, urging fellow deputies to vote in favor of approving the constitutionality of PEC 221/2019. This reflects a pivotal moment in legislative history.

Clarification on Discussion Scope

There is a clarification regarding previous requests for views; these were not intended to delay merit discussions but rather focused solely on admissibility related to over 30 million workers affected by current labor conditions.

Workers' Rights Advocacy

The speaker advocates strongly for workers’ rights, referencing specific groups like street cleaners who lack adequate working conditions and emphasizing their right to manage their own time effectively.

Critique of Labor Conditions

A critique is made against outdated labor practices reminiscent of past injustices, asserting that modern workers should not have their autonomy compromised by exploitative work arrangements such as intermittent contracts.

Call for Legislative Change

Urging an end to outdated work schedules (6x1), the speaker calls for greater worker autonomy and happiness while condemning any sentiments that support oppressive labor practices or nostalgia for authoritarian regimes.

Conclusion on Legislative Process

Following a successful vote on admissibility, there is recognition of respectful dialogue throughout this process, affirming the committee's role in ensuring constitutional matters progress appropriately through legislative channels.

Future Steps in Legislation

The matter will now advance to a special committee where further debate will occur with societal participation; appreciation is expressed towards those who contributed significantly during this phase of discussion.

Parliamentary Achievements and the End of 6x1 Workday

Acknowledgment of Contributions

The speaker commends a balanced and serious deputy for their expected contributions to the special committee, emphasizing collaboration among parliament members.

Gratitude is expressed towards all participants, including the press and committee staff, marking the day as historically significant for Brazilian parliament.

Legislative Progress on PEC 6x1

The speaker praises the technical quality of a report presented by Deputy Paulo Azi, highlighting its approval as indicative of its merit.

Following President Lula's support for PEC (Proposed Constitutional Amendment), there was unanimous approval in CCJ (Constitutional and Justice Committee), signaling strong political momentum against the 6x1 workday.

Commitment to Workers' Rights

The speaker emphasizes that this moment represents hope for workers across Brazil, advocating decisively against the 6x1 workday.

Recognition is given to various deputies and President Lula for establishing a new pace in legislative processes regarding labor rights.

Critique of Opposition

The speaker notes that many who opposed ending the 6x1 workday did not show up to defend their stance, labeling it as cowardice.

A call is made to embrace workers' rights while condemning anti-union sentiments as criminal behavior that isolates workers from collective bargaining power.

Vision for Future Labor Policies

The speech concludes with an affirmation of solidarity with Brazilian workers and a commitment to abolishing the 6x1 work schedule.

Emphasis is placed on family time being essential for human well-being beyond just economic needs, urging lawmakers to prioritize policies that enhance quality of life.