وثائقي | البعث.. حكاية الحزب الذي شيّعته الثورة السورية

The Rise and Fall of the Arab Nation and the Ba'ath Party

Introduction to the Arab Nation

• The speaker emphasizes the concept of a unified Arab nation with a lasting message, contrasting it with its division into separate states.

• The Ba'ath Party is introduced as one of the largest and longest-standing political parties in the Arab world, which has faced internal conflicts among its leaders.

Founding Figures of the Ba'ath Party

• The speaker highlights Michel Aflaq and Salah al-Din al-Bitar as key figures in establishing the Ba'ath ideology, noting their socialist leanings.

• Zaki al-Arsuzi is mentioned as another foundational figure whose ideas contributed significantly to early Ba'athist thought; he was born in 1899 in Alexandretta, now under Turkish control.

Historical Context of Ba'athism

• Al-Arsuzi's vision for an Arab identity began in Alexandretta and expanded into a broader pan-Arab ideology, leading to the establishment of the Ba'ath Party in 1940.

• Concurrently, another nationalist movement called "Arab Revival" emerged under Aflaq's leadership while studying at Sorbonne University alongside Bitar.

Evolution of Political Movements

• By late 1939, Aflaq and Bitar aimed to transform their ideas into a political movement that would eventually lead to forming a party focused on Arab socialism.

• Despite initial struggles, by 1947, after Syria gained independence from French colonial rule, they successfully established the Arab Ba'ath Party.

Challenges Faced by Early Leadership

• Following its formation, the party faced repression from new authorities; many leaders were imprisoned or forced into exile during late 1940s and early 1950s.

• In 1954, after merging with other factions to become known as the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party, it became one of Syria's two major political forces alongside communists.

Regional Influence and Expansion

• The party gained popularity across various Arab nations during this period; branches were established in countries like Iraq, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine, Yemen, Kuwait, Mauritania, Sudan, and Morocco.

• However, internal disputes arose among regional leadership within these branches due to differing national interests versus pan-Arab unity ideals.

Military Coups and Political Strategy

• The party capitalized on military coups occurring throughout the region; notably influenced by Egypt’s successful revolution led by Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1952.

• Efforts were made to recruit military officers sympathetic to Ba’athist ideals across several countries but faced varying degrees of success based on local conditions.

Syrian Political Landscape Post-Independence

• Syria experienced numerous military coups post-independence; notable events include Colonel Husni al-Zaim's coup against Shukri al-Kuwatli in 1949 followed by subsequent power shifts among military leaders.

• Ultimately leading up to Syria’s unification with Egypt under Nasser’s leadership (1958), which lasted until another coup ousted him from power in 1961.

This structured summary captures key insights from each segment while providing timestamps for easy reference.

The Rise of Ba'ath Party in the Arab World

The Initial Power Shift in Syria

• The Ba'ath Party's rise to power marked a significant moment as it became the first party to assume authority in the Arab world, unifying various factions under one banner with regional leadership.

• This victory was expected to have major repercussions for neighboring countries, particularly Iraq, which would later experience its own brief history with the Ba'ath Party.

Historical Context of Monarchy and Republic

• King Faisal I initially ruled Syria but was ousted by French forces in 1920, leading him to reign over Iraq under British mandate. This reflects Britain's support for monarchies compared to France's preference for republics.

• The monarchy in Iraq lasted until 1958 when a military coup led by Abdul Karim Qasim and Abdul Salam Arif established a republic, marking a shift from royal rule.

The Ba'ath Party's Influence and Internal Struggles

• In 1963, following a coup against Qasim, the Iraqi Ba'athists struggled to maintain control amidst internal conflicts that saw Abdul Salam Arif reclaim power shortly after their takeover.

• By 1968, however, the Ba'ath Party successfully organized another coup that solidified its governance over both Iraq and Syria simultaneously—a rare occurrence in Arab politics at that time.

Sectarian Dynamics within the Region

• The complexities of sectarianism played a crucial role in shaping the political landscape; minorities were often drawn towards the Ba'ath ideology due to its promise of unity above sectarian divides amid diverse ethnicities and religions present in regions like Greater Syria and Iraq.

• Various religious groups coexisted within these territories—Arabs, Kurds, Turkmen—and each had internal divisions (e.g., Sunni vs Shia), complicating national identity formation under an overarching Arab nationalism promoted by parties like Ba'ath.

Emergence of Nationalist Ideologies

• Following Ottoman rule's collapse, nationalist movements emerged advocating for Arab unity over sectarian identities; this included figures like Anton Saadeh who founded the Syrian Social Nationalist Party emphasizing regional unity rather than broader Arab nationalism.

• Early Ba’ath ideologues also hailed from minority backgrounds yet sought comprehensive Arab unity across all nations from Morocco to Iraq—contrasting with more localized nationalist sentiments prevalent among other groups at that time.

Political Developments Post-Coup

• After taking power in Syria post-coup (1963), Amin al-Hafiz faced challenges from leftist factions within his party leading to his eventual ousting by figures such as Salah Jadid who aimed at consolidating Alawite influence while maintaining Sunni representation symbolically through leaders like Noureddine al-Attasi.

• Despite initial attempts at inclusivity during early governance phases where even Christians held ministerial positions, rising sectarian tensions began reshaping political dynamics significantly under new leadership focused on empowering Alawites within government structures post-coup era around 1966 onward.

The Dynamics of the Ba'ath Party in Iraq and Syria

Historical Context of the Ba'ath Party

• The Iraqi Ba'ath Party has been active since 1951, led by Fouad al-Rikabi during a Sunni monarchy, with early attempts to seize power failing in 1963.

• After initial failures, the party escalated its leadership with Sunni figures like Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr and Saddam Hussein, who took control in Baghdad in 1968.

• The Iraqi branch maintained a commitment to Arab unity while the Syrian branch shifted towards Syrian nationalism, leading to a split between them.

Leadership and Ideological Differences

• A generational shift occurred within the party; founders were intellectuals while new leaders were military figures who overthrew political elites.

• Both Saddam Hussein and Hafez al-Assad sought to unify the Ba'ath Party but pursued different administrative strategies influenced by their respective national contexts.

• Iraq emphasized Arab nationalism while Syria focused on maintaining its own identity, creating further ideological rifts.

Sectarian Influences on Politics

• Saddam viewed Sunni Arabs as the majority entitled to rule, whereas Hafez represented an Alawite minority resistant to Sunni dominance.

• Each regime supported opposition movements against each other: Baghdad backed Syrian dissidents while Damascus aided Iraqi opponents.

Shifting Alliances and Conflicts

• Both leaders deviated from original Ba'ath principles for political survival; Assad allied with international forces contrary to his anti-imperialist rhetoric.

• The fall of either leader was seen as a potential end for their version of Ba'athism due to personalistic rule overshadowing party ideology.

Key Events Leading to Downfall

• Saddam's rise culminated in his complete control by 1979 but faced immediate challenges from Iran's Islamic Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini.

• Tensions escalated into an eight-year war with Iran that resulted in significant losses for both sides without clear victory for Iraq.

Final Stages of Power

• In pursuit of regional dominance post-Iran war, Saddam invaded Kuwait in the early '90s, leading to international backlash and eventual U.S. intervention.

• This invasion marked a critical turning point that ultimately led to the collapse of his regime in 2003.

Comparison Between Leaders: Hafez vs. Saddam

• Unlike Saddam’s confrontational style, Hafez was pragmatic and engaged secretly with Israel despite public denouncements.

• Hafez faced internal dissent from groups like the Muslim Brotherhood but suppressed it violently during events such as the Hama massacre in 1982.

Transition of Power Post-Hafez

• Following Hafez's death in 2000, his son Bashar assumed power under controversial circumstances that defied constitutional norms.

• Bashar represents a third generation within Ba'athism lacking deep ideological roots or political acumen compared to previous leaders.

Bashar al-Assad's Regime and the Fall of Ba'athism

The Assassination of Rafik Hariri

• Bashar al-Assad, alongside his allies in Lebanon, including Hezbollah, orchestrated the assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafik Hariri in 2005. This act led to Syria's withdrawal from Lebanon.

• Despite this significant event, Assad failed to learn that violence does not yield positive outcomes; he continued oppressive tactics even as the Arab Spring began to unfold.

Response to Protests

• In response to protests across Syrian cities demanding an end to Assad's regime, the only method Assad understood was repression.

• Unable to suppress the majority of Syrians alone, he sought foreign assistance from Iranian and Russian forces to help quell dissent.

The Military Movement Against Damascus

• By late 2024, a military figure with roots in the Golan Heights initiated a movement towards Damascus after 13 years since the start of the Syrian revolution.

• This marked a pivotal moment leading to Bashar fleeing Damascus and potentially ending Ba'ath rule in Syria after 60 years.

Bashar's Escape and Its Implications

• In stark contrast to Saddam Hussein’s defiant end, Bashar fled out of fear without informing anyone, aided by Russian support.

• His escape symbolized not just a personal failure but also indicated a broader collapse of Ba'athism in Syria and possibly beyond.

The Future of Ba'athism Post-Revolution

• Following the decline of Ba'athism in Iraq and Syria due to American occupation and revolution respectively, questions arose about its potential resurgence.

• While remnants exist—particularly among those loyalists who grew up under Saddam—returning to power seems unlikely unless significant upheaval occurs within Iraq’s current governance structure.

The Death of Ideology

• Although some dormant cells remain within both countries that could act if conditions allow, public sentiment has largely rejected Ba'athist ideology.

• The party itself has been transformed into a tool for oppression rather than an ideological movement; its leaders betrayed foundational principles by ruling through force.