Prince Harry's court claims warrant 'fair amount of scepticism': Megyn Kelly

Prince Harry's Testimony on Phone Hacking

In this section, the speaker discusses Prince Harry's testimony about how his privacy was invaded through phone hacking. The speaker expresses skepticism towards Harry's claims due to his history of criticizing the media.

Prince Harry's Claims

• Prince Harry claims that his privacy was invaded through phone hacking by British newspapers.

• The news organization denies these claims and there are many plaintiffs claiming their communications were intercepted.

• The speaker is skeptical of Harry's claims due to his constant criticism of the media and calling journalists criminals.

• Harry also accuses the royal family of withholding information from him regarding the issue.

Speaker's Opinion

• The speaker looks at this situation with an open mind but a fair amount of skepticism towards Harry's claims.

• The speaker believes that it doesn't make sense for someone to pick fights with those who buy ink by the barrel, as it hasn't worked out well for Harry or Meghan in the past.

Day Two of Prince Harry's Testimony on Phone Hacking

In this section, the speaker provides an update on day two of Prince Harry's testimony on phone hacking. Witness statements have been made public and there is insight into what they all knew and when.

Witness Statements

• Witness statements have been made public which provide insight into what they all knew and when regarding phone hacking.

• Prince Harry claims that two private investigators said that The Daily Mail paid them to hack his voicemail, obtain credit card bills, and follow his friends.

• It was made clear to Harry that the royal family did not sit in the witness box because it could open up a can of worms.

• Other complainants, such as actress Sadie Frost and Baroness Lawrence, also provide statements about their experiences with voicemail hacking and electronic surveillance.

The Daily Mail's Response

• The Publishers of The Daily Mail vigorously contest the claims being made in court and argue that their claims have been brought too late to have their day in court.

Conclusion

In this section, the speaker concludes by thanking the audience for listening to their thoughts on Prince Harry's testimony on phone hacking.

Final Thoughts

• The speaker thanks the audience for listening to their thoughts on Prince Harry's testimony on phone hacking.

Prince Harry's Legal Battle with Associated Newspapers

This section discusses Prince Harry's legal battle with Associated Newspapers, the owners of The Daily Mail and The Mail on Sunday.

The Case Against Prince Harry

• Prince Harry may believe that he can simply tell his truth in court and win the case, but under cross-examination, things could turn around.

• Associated Newspapers will defend themselves vigorously against the allegations. They claim that the offenses are too old to take action against and that they did not commission or employ anyone to carry out any unlawful activities.

• They have a sworn statement from Gavin Burrows, who allegedly carried out these activities, stating that he was not commissioned or employed by The Daily Mail to do anything.

Potential Consequences for Prince Harry

• If this case goes to trial, it will be a real slugging match and very uncomfortable for Prince Harry.

• In his book "Spare," Prince Harry talks about drug use such as smoking weed on the beach and using cocaine. A conviction for drug offenses would prevent him from entering the United States due to their strict laws regarding Class A drugs.

Overall, this section provides an overview of the legal battle between Prince Harry and Associated Newspapers. It highlights potential consequences for both parties involved.