Garmin Forerunner 165 vs. Coros Pace 3: Das ist die Beste Einsteiger-Sportuhr!

Comparison of Garmin v.a. 165 and Kovos-Pace 3

Pricing and Versions

• The Kovos-Pace 3 is priced around €250, while the Garmin v.a. 165 starts at €280 for the standard version.

• The Garmin has a music version available for €330; the Kovos-Pace 3 includes music storage by default.

Design and Build

• Both watches are lightweight and primarily made of plastic, with the Kovos-Pace 3 measuring 41.9 mm in diameter.

• The Garmin v.a. 165 is slightly larger at 43 mm but similarly light at around 39 grams.

User Interface

• Both watches can be operated via touch or buttons; the Garmin has five buttons compared to two on the Kovos-Pace.

• The display technology differs: Kovos uses a transflective LCD, while Garmin features an AMOLED display.

Display Quality and Functionality

Brightness and Resolution

• The Garmin's AMOLED display is brighter with more vibrant colors than the Kovos' LCD.

• Both have a 1.2-inch display, but resolution differs: Kovos at 240x240 pixels vs. Garmin at 390x390 pixels.

Outdoor Performance

• Transflective displays like that of the Kovos perform better outdoors due to light reflection capabilities.

• The always-on feature of both displays affects battery life differently; transreflective is more power-efficient.

Battery Life Comparison

Manufacturer Claims

• The Kovos-Pace claims up to 17 days under normal use; Garmin offers up to 11 days without always-on mode.

Real-world Testing

• In testing, both started at 89% battery after gym use; after jogging, they were at approximately 84% (Garmin) and 82% (Kovos).

Comparison of Kovos-Pace 3 and Garmin V165

Battery Life and General Features

• The Kovos-Pace 3 has lost 17% battery, resulting in approximately 6 days of use.

• The Garmin V165 aligns more closely with manufacturer specifications for battery life.

• Both watches are designed primarily for runners, but the Kovos-Pace 3 offers a multisport mode.

Training Functions

• In training mode, the Kovos-Pace 3 can record multiple sports in one session; the V165 requires manual recording for each sport.

• Both devices track basic metrics like distance, pace, heart rate, and calories; advanced metrics include running power in watts.

• The V165 tracks additional metrics such as vertical oscillation and ground contact time directly on the wrist.

Sensor Connectivity and Pace Tracking

• External sensors can connect to both watches; however, the Kovos-Pace 3 only supports Bluetooth while the V165 also supports ANT+.

• The Kovos-Pace 3 tracks an incline-adjusted pace that the V165 does not offer.

• For workout planning, both watches allow setting target paces; however, the V165 provides more detailed strategies through its Pace Pro feature.

Training Analysis and Health Features

• Post-training analysis on the Kovos-Pace 3 includes training load values and effects categorized by aerobic impact.

• The watch features widgets for tracking weekly training load which are absent in the V165.

• Health functions include heart rate variability and blood oxygen saturation measurements; however, sleep monitoring is limited on the Kovos-Pace 3.

Additional Features

• The Garmin V165 offers a morning report summarizing key data upon waking—this feature is missing from the Kovos-Pace 3.

• While both watches provide impressive functionalities at their price points, they differ significantly in long-term training analysis capabilities.

GPS Accuracy

Test of Running Watches

Performance Comparison

• Both Kovos-Pace 3 and Garmin V165 accurately track running routes through various terrains.

• No visible differences between the two watches during initial tests; both performed well under challenging conditions.

• Minor inaccuracies are normal; both watches show comparable results despite the lack of multi-band support.

Navigation Features

• Neither watch offers topographic maps, but both provide basic breadcrumb navigation.

• Users can create routes via apps or upload GPX files for navigation; useful features include a rotating crown and touch display.

• Both watches have backtrack functions, compasses, and barometric altimeters for accurate elevation tracking.

Heart Rate Monitoring

• Garmin V165 uses a fourth-generation Elevate sensor; Koro employs its latest sensor for heart rate accuracy testing.

• Initial heart rate readings from both watches closely match those from a chest strap monitor during runs.

• During strength training, optical heart rate measurements are less reliable due to movement fluctuations.

Overall Accuracy and Recommendations

• Garmin V165 shows slightly better accuracy in heart rate monitoring compared to Koro Pace 3 during workouts.

• For activities like strength training, using a chest strap is recommended for more precise tracking.

Display Technology Comparison

• Transflective displays have advantages in sunlight conditions.

• If display technology is not a priority, consider Kurorspaces 3 for its lower price.