Opening of the Hearing

Introduction to the Case

• The hearing is held on February 26, 2026, at 12:02 PM in Juncamiento Court, Chanco District, Mexico. The purpose is to address penalties and damage reparations for case number 339/2025 against Jesús Adolfo Fuente Vázquez.

• The charges involve violence against victim Alondra Abigail Hernández Cruz and moral damages to commercial chain Oxo SADB represented by Vladimir González Blanqu. Legal framework references Articles 53 and 58 of the National Code of Criminal Procedure.

Presiding Judge and Participants

• The session is presided over by Armando Osorio González, a master in criminal procedural law. All parties are asked to introduce themselves for record purposes.

• Key participants include:

• Public Prosecutor: Estera Sánchez Maza.

• Legal Advisor: Fausto Manzano Vázquez.

• Defense Attorney: César Omar Sánchez Jiménez.

• Accused: Jesús Adolfo Puente Vázquez.

Proceedings of the Hearing

Notification Confirmation

• Both victim Alondra Abigail Hernández Cruz and Oxo SADB have been duly notified about this hearing as per judicial records dated February 25, 2026. This confirms readiness for proceedings.

Opening Statements

• The judge opens the debate and indicates that arguments from lawyers will be heard next, followed by evidence presentation relevant to this stage of the process before closing the debate again.

Arguments Presented

Initial Arguments from Prosecution

• The Public Prosecutor will present initial arguments regarding sentencing following a conviction against Puente Vázquez, including requests for penalties related to both material and moral damages incurred by the victims.

Defense Considerations

• The defense attorney emphasizes consideration of their client's alleged responsibility during this phase while also addressing potential reparations for damages (both moral and economic). They request careful evaluation based on presented evidence during trial stages.

Evidence Presentation

Final Arguments from Prosecution

• Following established procedures from July 9, 2025, it’s noted that no new evidence has been offered at this moment; thus, final arguments are requested from the prosecution side concerning sentencing recommendations based on previous trial evidence presented earlier in court sessions.

Sentencing Recommendations

• The prosecutor requests specific penalties under current legal statutes:

• Imprisonment and fines as outlined in Article numbers specified within state penal code.

• Suspension of civil rights along with public admonishment for Puente Vázquez.

• Seizure of items linked to crime (e.g., firearm-like lighter).

• Compensation claims totaling approximately $108,000 for moral damages plus additional amounts for material losses sustained by victims during incidents related to case proceedings.

Legal Proceedings and Arguments in Court

Consideration of Evidence and Victim's Rights

• The speaker emphasizes the importance of considering the evidence presented during the trial phase, requesting that it be used to uphold the victim's rights.

• Reference is made to constitutional articles and laws regarding reparations for damages, highlighting legal frameworks guiding the case.

• The defense attorney requests a minimum penalty for their client, stressing the need to consider both moral and material damage payments.

Challenges in Evidence Presentation

• The speaker argues that no new evidence was presented in this hearing to support the prosecution's claims, questioning its validity.

• A request is made not to consider certain petitions due to lack of supporting evidence presented at this stage.

Closing Statements and Deliberation

• After final arguments are recorded, the judge asks if the accused wishes to make any statements; he declines.

• The judge announces a recess for deliberation on sentencing based on arguments from both sides.