238ª Reunião Extraordinária do Conselho Consultivo da Anatel, de 14/04/2026

Telecommunications Evolution and Personal Experiences

The Role of Public Telephones

• Discussion begins with a light-hearted question about the use of public telephones (orelhão), highlighting nostalgia for past communication methods.

• Reference to "fichinha" (tokens used in public phones) indicates how communication has evolved over time, transitioning from physical tokens to digital devices.

Shift from Landlines to Mobile Phones

• The conversation shifts to the decline of landline phones, emphasizing that most people now prefer mobile phones due to their convenience and multifunctionality.

• Acknowledgment that having internet access on mobile devices provides users with everything they need, including music and information.

Communication Preferences Today

• Participants discuss their preferred modes of communication, revealing a trend towards texting and audio messages rather than traditional phone calls.

• Mention of using emojis in text communications illustrates how digital interactions have adapted to convey emotions more effectively.

Personal Anecdotes About Technology Use

• Daniel Vilas Boas introduces himself and his mission to explore people's relationships with telecommunications in Brazil.

• A humorous exchange about remembering the tune for collect calls reflects on shared cultural experiences tied to older technology.

Reflections on Technological Changes

• The dialogue highlights feelings of anxiety when without a mobile phone, showcasing how reliant individuals have become on these devices for daily life.

• Concluding remarks celebrate Anatel's 25 years of work ensuring quality telecommunications access for Brazilians, underscoring the importance of regulatory bodies in technological advancement.

Telecommunications Evolution and Personal Experiences

The Impact of Internet on Daily Life

• The speaker emphasizes that having internet access equates to having everything one needs, including music and communication tools.

• A discussion arises about the anxiety experienced when being without a cell phone, highlighting modern reliance on digital communication methods like texts and audio messages.

• The speaker shares personal anecdotes about using two phones, illustrating how technology has evolved and its impact on daily life.

Reflections on Past Communication Methods

• A conversation begins about the use of public payphones (orelhão), reminiscing about past experiences with them, such as using tokens for calls.

• The speakers discuss the decline of landline telephones in favor of mobile phones, noting that most people now carry a cell phone instead.

• There is a reflection on how life was before smartphones and the internet, prompting thoughts about historical communication methods like books.

Modern Communication Preferences

• The dialogue continues with an exploration of how people communicate today—primarily through text messages rather than voice calls.

• One speaker expresses a dislike for phone calls but appreciates sending audio messages as they convey tone better than text alone.

Meeting Proceedings at Anatel

• Transitioning to formal proceedings, a meeting is declared open by the chairperson, indicating it’s focused on internal regulations within Anatel.

• Discussion centers around proposed changes to the internal regulations of Anatel's Consultative Council, emphasizing collaborative efforts among council members to refine these rules.

• The chairperson acknowledges productive exchanges between meetings aimed at gathering diverse opinions from council members regarding regulatory updates.

Collaborative Efforts in Regulatory Changes

• Emphasis is placed on collective input from council members to ensure that new regulations reflect shared interests and perspectives effectively.

• The ongoing development of the internal regulation document is highlighted as a work in progress requiring further discussion before final approval.

Discussion on Council Proposals

Contributions and Divergences

• The speaker acknowledges the valuable contributions from council members that helped improve the draft document. This highlights the importance of collaborative input in decision-making processes.

• There is a recognition of challenges in facilitating open debates due to differing perspectives among council members, which may hinder collective understanding.

Key Discussion Points

• The speaker emphasizes the need for further maturation of certain points within the council's proposal, aiming for an ideal outcome as perceived by the Constitutive Council. This reflects a commitment to thorough deliberation before finalizing decisions.

• Four specific points are identified for discussion:

1. Elections of president and vice-president (Article 3).

2. Loss of mandate conditions (Article 5).

3. Access to information (Article 6, paragraph 4).

4. Budget considerations (Article 23).

This structured approach aims to ensure comprehensive coverage during discussions.

Article Review Process

• The speaker plans to read Article 3 as it currently stands in the draft, ensuring all members have a shared understanding before discussing potential amendments or concerns related to its content. This step is crucial for informed dialogue among participants.

Election Mechanism Insights

• Article 3 outlines that the Advisory Council will have a president and vice-president elected through independent votes with strict rules regarding representation from different blocks, promoting diversity in leadership roles within the council structure. This mechanism aims to enhance representativity among various sectors involved in governance processes.

• Specific election procedures are detailed:

• Majority vote required for election.

• Restrictions on candidates from similar representation blocks holding both positions.

• Invalid results if both positions are filled by representatives from the same block.

These rules aim to prevent concentration of power and ensure fair representation across different interests within the council's framework.

Concerns Raised

• A concern is raised about how restrictions on vice-presidential candidates might affect electoral choices, emphasizing that while representativity is important, it should not undermine voter preferences within the council's decision-making process. This indicates a tension between structural integrity and democratic choice among members.

• Additionally, it's noted that under current regulations, the role of vice-president lacks specific responsibilities beyond substituting for the president when necessary; this raises questions about whether such limitations adequately reflect member expectations or needs within governance structures moving forward.

Discussion on Council Leadership and Legitimacy

Concerns About Regulatory Framework

• The speaker acknowledges the noble intentions behind the regulatory device aimed at promoting plurality and preserving council functionality.

• Emphasizes that the legitimacy of a council president stems from peer trust, which is expressed through an electoral process involving votes.

• Highlights the organic nature of the current election process, where candidates must engage in dialogue to gain support, enhancing legitimacy.

• Argues that this organicity is crucial for pure and direct legitimization, contrasting it with artificial mechanisms imposed by regulations.

• Warns that a president not favored by the majority could discourage participation and affect overall council dynamics.

Implications of External Criteria

• Discusses how external criteria for eligibility can influence council leadership choices, potentially misaligning with members' interests.

• Acknowledges that while these criteria may be well-intentioned, they introduce exogenous factors affecting candidate selection.

• Points out that such external influences might lead to decisions lacking future relevance or effectiveness in different council compositions.

• Suggests maintaining current processes to preserve synergy within the council, as changes could disrupt existing dynamics.

• Raises philosophical considerations about representativity in democracy and how external conditions can shape leadership roles.

Call for Reflection on Election Process

• Proposes keeping election processes as free as possible to avoid unintended consequences from new regulations or conditions.

• Expresses concern over potential innovations in electoral processes that lack historical benchmarks for evaluation regarding regulatory efficiency.

• Reiterates that naturalness and organicity are vital aspects of any electoral mechanism within the council's framework.

• Concludes by inviting further discussion on these points while acknowledging their importance in shaping future deliberations.

• Opens up for additional comments from other council members following his reflections.

Acknowledgment of Contributions

• Another member expresses gratitude towards Paloma for her diligent work on the report and aligns with previous sentiments regarding pluralism and broad participation.

Discussion on Leadership and Election Processes

Overview of Council Dynamics

• The speaker notes a positive synergy within the council, emphasizing the importance of commitment to leadership roles such as president and vice-president.

• A concern is raised about potential issues if future elections result in candidates who are unwilling or unqualified for their roles, highlighting the need for genuine interest in leadership.

Election Procedures and Regulations

• Reference to Decree 2338, Article 39, which states that the president is elected by members through a secret ballot based on majority votes, regardless of candidacy status.

• The speaker questions whether current practices might conflict with established regulations regarding election processes.

Suggestions for Improving Electoral Timing

• A proposal is made to shift election periods to the second semester when quorum tends to be more effective due to higher member attendance.

• The speaker reflects on past experiences where council participation was lower in the first semester, suggesting that timing adjustments could enhance electoral legitimacy.

Strategic Planning and Functionality

• Emphasis on the need for strategic planning within the council's operations, advocating for predefined timelines to ensure effective functioning.

• Suggestion that moving elections could serve as a complementary strategy to improve overall organizational effectiveness.

Considerations from Other Councils

• Acknowledgment of contributions from other council members regarding electoral timing and its impact on quorum challenges.

• Discussion about ensuring broad eligibility criteria for vice-presidential candidates while maintaining representation balance between sectors.

Comparative Analysis with CONANDA Elections

• Insights drawn from CONANDA’s internal regulations regarding presidential elections highlight similarities with proposed changes; they emphasize alternating representation between government and civil society.

• Suggestion made to explore other councils' regulations further for potential adaptations or analogies that could inform current proposals.

Proposal for Alternation in Leadership

Discussion on Proposals and Cultural Norms

• The speaker proposes creating a policy or cultural norm to encourage leadership alternation, even if it is not formally included in the internal regulations.

• They reference existing customs in various governmental elections that are not explicitly stated in any formal rules but have become accepted practices.

• Emphasizing the importance of representation from different sectors, the speaker argues for discussing the custom of alternation within leadership roles.

Insights on Precedents and Comparisons

• A council member expresses interest in researching precedents from federal public administration regarding leadership alternation, indicating a collaborative effort to explore this proposal further.

• The speaker acknowledges their limited knowledge about CONANDA (National Council for Children and Adolescents) but highlights its specific focus on social policy and fundamental rights related to children and adolescents.

Differences Between Councils

• The discussion contrasts CONANDA's purpose with that of ANATEL's Consultative Council, noting that ANATEL has a more technical regulatory focus rather than solely dealing with rights issues. This distinction is crucial for understanding how each council operates.

• The speaker points out that while a rights-based approach may be reasonable for councils like CONANDA, ANATEL must also consider regulatory efficiency and obligations alongside rights discussions.

Researching Other Councils' Practices

• Another council member commends the work done by Paloma on the regimental proposals and suggests investigating what other councils have implemented regarding leadership structures without losing sight of their unique legal nature as a sectoral body.

• They emphasize the need to adhere to existing decrees while exploring new ideas, ensuring that any changes align with established frameworks rather than introducing unnecessary complexities.

Technical Considerations in Leadership Proposals

• Paloma agrees with most points raised during discussions but stresses the importance of maintaining a technical perspective grounded in human rights as they relate to telecommunications amidst digital transformation debates. She questions whether there is an established custom within the Consultative Council regarding alternating leadership among blocks.

Discussion on Institutional Culture and Leadership Roles

Proposal for Encouraging Tradition in Council Elections

• The speaker suggests that while mandatory rules may not be ideal, signaling the importance of maintaining traditions within the council's regulations could encourage future compositions to uphold these customs without imposing strict prohibitions.

Perspectives on Leadership Interest

• There is a discussion about the lack of competition for leadership roles (president and vice-president) within the council, attributed to unclear reasons and possibly a general disinterest in taking on such responsibilities.

Challenges of Leadership Roles

• Acknowledgment that leading requires significant effort, including organizational discipline and dialogical capacity, which not all council members may possess or desire. This reflects a broader issue regarding engagement in leadership positions.

Personal Reflections on Leadership Experience

• The speaker shares personal experiences transitioning into leadership, highlighting the complexities and bureaucratic nature of managing council functions, which can often be more challenging than anticipated. They emphasize that effective leadership involves careful planning and communication with various stakeholders.

Need for Formal Intervention Based on Evidence

• The speaker argues that formal changes to processes should only occur when there is clear evidence indicating that current practices do not serve broader interests effectively; they believe this is not currently the case based on their observations over two years.

Historical Context of Council Practices

• Discussion includes insights from past presidents about traditional practices within councils, noting a lack of pluralism in interest towards leadership roles and suggesting that some members may prefer stability over competition due to convenience or agreement among peers.

Comparison with Other Councils

• The speaker compares their council's election process with another (National Data Protection Council), where no electoral process exists for leadership roles but rather appointments are made based on regulatory definitions established by federal decree, illustrating different governance models across councils.

Discussion on the Advisory Council's Functionality

The Role of the Advisory Council

• The speaker reflects on the effectiveness of an ancient wisdom element within the Advisory Council, suggesting that it has functioned well due to its established nature.

• A norm is deemed sensible when it addresses a problem or becomes outdated; this perspective is crucial for understanding electoral decisions and their functionality.

• The speaker notes a recurring presence from the Senate in council positions, indicating a pattern in representation and potential implications for future appointments.

Considerations on Rule Changes

• There’s an emphasis on making changes only when necessary to resolve existing issues or when rules become misaligned with their intended social purpose.

• The discussion highlights that alterations should aim to solve problems rather than introduce unnecessary principles, as current practices have been effective.

Article 5: Loss of Mandate Provisions

Proposed Changes to Mandate Loss Criteria

• New provisions outline conditions under which members may lose their mandate, including conduct incompatible with dignity and excessive unexcused absences.

• Justified absences are defined clearly, requiring formal communication at least five days prior or valid reasons post-meeting, such as health issues or official duties.

Incompatibility Conduct Clarifications

• Specific actions that would be considered incompatible include using one's position for personal gain, conflicts of interest not disclosed, and misuse of confidential information.

• The rationale behind detailing loss criteria aims to provide clarity for council members regarding what constitutes justified absence and incompatible conduct.

Discussion on Mandate Loss and Council Dynamics

Proposal for Automatic Mandate Loss

• A proposal was made to include a provision for automatic loss of mandate in cases of unexcused absences, aiming to eliminate subjectivity from the presidency's decision-making process. This would establish a clear mechanism for mandate loss.

Concerns About Council Participation

• The discussion highlighted concerns regarding disinterest and participation difficulties within the Consultative Council, emphasizing the need for clarity on conditions that could lead to mandate loss. It is crucial to balance public interest with effective council functioning.

Excessive Detailing of Mandate Loss Hypotheses

• There was a debate about whether detailing the hypotheses for mandate loss might be excessive and potentially hinder council operations in the future. The collective perception of these hypotheses as reasonable limits was questioned.

Balancing Responsiveness and Obstacles

• The importance of having clear regulations for responses related to mandate loss was acknowledged, but it was also noted that such regulations could create obstacles depending on the political context or administrative functioning of the council.

Challenges Faced by Council Members

• Members face challenges due to their primary professional commitments, which can affect their availability for council duties. This raises questions about balancing voluntary service with public responsibilities, especially when meetings conflict with members' schedules.

Historical Context and Subjectivity Issues

• The need for clear definitions regarding conduct incompatible with council roles was emphasized as a way to fill historical gaps in regulations, reducing subjective interpretations that could jeopardize sector representation during complex selection processes.

Complexity in Selection Processes

• The complexity involved in selecting representatives through processes like those conducted by the Ministry of Communications contrasts sharply with simpler methods used by legislative bodies like the Senate or Chamber of Deputies, highlighting potential disparities in representation dynamics within councils.

Renunciation and Mandate Issues in the Council

Discussion on Renunciation of Executive Representatives

• The speaker acknowledges that there has been a previous renunciation of an executive representative, which took time to publish due to the need for a replacement.

• It is noted that a member may continue their mandate even if they no longer belong to the institution that originally nominated them, although this situation is not common.

Complexities of Representation

• The speaker reflects on similar situations within another council (CNPD), emphasizing the complexity when representatives lose ties with their original sectors.

• A potential conflict of interest arises when a representative chosen by civil society later aligns with business interests, raising questions about legitimacy.

Operational Capacity and Procedural Structure

• The discussion highlights the importance of having robust operational capacity to handle incidents related to mandates effectively.

• Emphasis is placed on ensuring procedural guarantees are in place for administrative processes concerning mandate loss.

Legal Framework and Competencies

• The necessity for specific expertise in handling these situations is stressed, alongside adherence to constitutional and legal frameworks guiding actions.

• Clarification is made regarding the authority for mandate loss being vested in the President of Brazil, as per Article 40 of Decree 2338.

Concerns Over Formal Procedures

• Questions arise about whether existing oversight bodies have competencies related to mandate issues within the council.

• There are concerns about discrepancies between proposed rules and existing laws, particularly regarding pre-hearing requirements before mandate loss can be decreed.

Discussion on Council Competencies and Information Access

Overview of Council's Competence

• The discussion centers around the competencies of the council regarding its functions, emphasizing that the decree and LGT define these roles. There is a concern about expanding competencies without proper validation.

• A question arises about who has the authority to make decisions, particularly whether it will be the president acting unilaterally or if there will be a collaborative approach within the council.

• Historical context is provided, noting past discussions during previous presidencies about similar issues, indicating that while no formal actions were taken before, such matters are likely to arise again.

Importance of Clear Regulations

• The need for well-defined rules is highlighted to ensure effective functioning of the council in future operations.

Comments from Council Members

• Council member Paloma expresses gratitude for contributions and introduces a significant point regarding information access as outlined in current proposals.

Proposal on Information Access

• Paloma reads from a proposal stating that it is within the council's competence to request information related to specific legal articles, which ties back to their oversight responsibilities.

• The proposal emphasizes adherence to Brazil’s Law on Access to Information (LAI), ensuring that councils have access to necessary documents while respecting confidentiality laws.

Discussion on Transparency and Accountability

• The rationale behind this proposal aims at enhancing predictability concerning information access levels and ensuring transparency in requests made by council members.

• Personal experiences shared by Paloma indicate that all her previous requests for information were met with responses, highlighting an existing practice but also pointing out gaps in formal regulations governing these processes.

Sensitivity Around Information Sharing

• It is proposed that when sharing sensitive information with the council, there should be clarity regarding any restrictions or partial disclosures required due to confidentiality concerns.

Reflection on Past Experiences

• Acknowledgment of past challenges faced by the council regarding information access leads into discussions about consulting legal advisors for guidance on decision-making processes related to sensitive data sharing.

Conclusion on Council Dynamics

• Emphasis placed on understanding the scope of mandates within councils suggests a need for better communication between advisory bodies and directors. This reflects ongoing efforts towards institutionalizing productive relationships within Anatel’s governance structure.

Discussion on Council Engagement and Autonomy

Importance of Council Participation

• The speaker emphasizes the significance of active participation in discussions with the Board of Directors, suggesting that increased engagement can lead to more effective outcomes.

• Recognition is given to various council members for their contributions, highlighting the importance of institutional gestures in fostering collaboration.

Autonomy and Operational Effectiveness

• The council's ability to function effectively is noted, even in the absence of specific dialogues with directors; autonomy is defined as being limited only by law and surrounding regulations.

• There is a desire for greater involvement in discussions with the Board, indicating a need for improved communication channels.

Information Access and Legislative Concerns

• The speaker expresses uncertainty about advocating for specific access to information but acknowledges that decisions will be made during plenary votes based on recommendations from relevant authorities.

• A call for broader debates within Anatel regarding potential changes to regulations or laws affecting council operations is made, emphasizing legislative engagement.

Reflection on Legal Frameworks

• The complexity of accessing information under current legal frameworks, including the General Data Protection Law (LGPD), is highlighted as a significant concern.

• Collective experiences from other councils are suggested as valuable insights into understanding mandates and operational limits.

Challenges in Transparency and Data Protection

• The discussion touches upon sensitive issues related to transparency and how recent laws may inadvertently hinder access to information.

• A journalist's inquiry illustrates real-world implications where requests for information were denied based on LGPD interpretations, raising questions about its application versus existing transparency laws.

Balancing Legal Considerations

• It’s noted that there was no prior expectation during legislative debates that LGPD would obstruct access to information; this reflects a gap in understanding among lawmakers.

• The speaker provides technical advice regarding data sharing contexts under LGPD, stressing that personal data can be shared legally depending on circumstances.

Discussion on Data Protection and Regulatory Frameworks

Evolution of Data Protection in Brazil

• The discussion highlights the lack of a regulatory framework like LGPD (General Data Protection Law) prior to the Supreme Court's positioning, indicating a significant evolution in understanding personal data as intrinsic to human dignity.

• The speaker notes that this maturation reflects both social and legal advancements, contrasting Brazil's situation with Europe, where deeper debates on data protection have been ongoing.

Challenges in Data Sharing

• There is uncertainty regarding whether the reluctance to share data stems from technical arguments or regulatory constraints imposed by LGPD. This raises questions about the motivations behind data sharing policies.

• The complexity of risk assessment in data protection is emphasized, noting that professionals must evaluate risks based on context-specific factors rather than applying a one-size-fits-all approach.

Contextual Considerations for Data Disclosure

• Different contexts require different treatments of personal information; for example, disclosing a public servant's CPF (Brazilian individual taxpayer registry identification) has distinct implications compared to revealing details about individuals receiving public funds through contracts.

• The conversation suggests that these contextual differences present significant legal challenges and necessitate careful consideration during discussions about data access and privacy rights.

Internal Discussions within Regulatory Bodies

• A proposal is made to reflect on the outcomes and scope of their mandate concerning internal discussions at Anatel (National Telecommunications Agency), suggesting that past incidents may not be isolated cases but part of broader patterns needing evaluation.

• The importance of gathering insights from various stakeholders within Anatel is highlighted to ensure comprehensive discussions around public access issues are conducted effectively.

Procedural Obligations and Timeframes

• A concern is raised regarding the rigid 30-day response requirement for formal propositions made by the council director, suggesting it may hinder effective deliberation due to existing workloads. Proposing an extension to 60 days could alleviate pressure while ensuring accountability.

• It’s noted that there exists a provision in legislation allowing for requests directed at the council director to be addressed within 60 days, aligning with suggestions made earlier regarding procedural flexibility.

Importance of Technical Dialogue

• Emphasis is placed on engaging with technical areas to understand limitations and opportunities presented by new regulations, which can enhance the effectiveness of their advisory role within Anatel’s structure. This dialogue aims at strengthening operational frameworks amidst evolving legislative landscapes.

Discussion on Budget Proposal for the Advisory Council

Overview of Budget Proposal Process

• The Advisory Council will annually draft a budget proposal necessary for its institutional activities, which must be submitted to the agency's board in line with internal processes for consolidating the NATEL budget.

• This budget proposal should include expenses related to council operations, meetings (both ordinary and extraordinary), social participation activities, technical studies, and administrative support.

Support and Transparency in Budget Execution

• The Advisory Council will receive technical and administrative support from relevant agency units to prepare the budget proposal, including access to information about previous budgets and cost estimates.

• The agency is committed to providing periodic updates on budget execution linked to the council, ensuring transparency and predictability in resource management.

Concerns Regarding Budget Execution

• There are concerns about the feasibility of executing the proposed budget due to potential delays between proposal submission and actual execution, which could span over a year or more. This raises issues regarding changes in council membership or priorities that may affect planned activities.

• The speaker emphasizes that if the council cannot fully execute its initially planned budget, it could pose problems not only for NATEL but also for public administration at large.

Clarification on Activities Funded by the Budget

• To enhance understanding among new council members regarding what can be funded through the budget, examples of eligible activities such as technical studies and special commissions are suggested for inclusion in the first paragraph of the proposal.

• There is a debate on whether to maintain detailed descriptions of fundable activities or revert to a more discretionary approach as currently outlined in existing regulations. This decision impacts how future councils might interpret their budgeting capabilities.

Broader Consultation on Budget Strategy

• A member expresses discomfort with innovating beyond current practices without broader consultation with ANATEL's technical areas, suggesting that they possess valuable experience regarding federal budgeting processes that could inform discussions within the council.

• It is proposed that engaging with these technical areas may enrich understanding of budgeting systems before making decisions about potential changes or innovations in their own budgeting process.

Discussion on Methodology and Next Steps

Methodological Approach to Meetings

• The speaker emphasizes the importance of a clear methodology for developing meetings, suggesting that a thematic discussion format will be more effective than presenting multiple drafts.

• There is an intention to avoid confusion by focusing on substantive themes rather than getting lost in minute details. This approach aims to streamline discussions around controversial topics.

Future Collaboration and Drafting

• A commitment is made to work on a final version of the draft before the next meeting, with an open invitation for council members to engage in dialogue and collective construction of ideas.

• The speaker expresses gratitude towards the president and encourages contributions from other council members, indicating a collaborative atmosphere.

Expanding Discussions with Technical Bodies

• Plans are outlined to involve technical bodies within ANATEL in future discussions, aiming for deeper understanding regarding regulatory reforms. This includes inviting representatives from these bodies for further insights.

• The speaker mentions ongoing dialogues with Dr. Cássio from the Federal Attorney's Office, highlighting his availability for necessary discussions related to regulatory revisions.

Engaging Other Councils

• An idea proposed by Councilor Paloma involves consulting other councils to explore different paradigms and best practices in regulation, which could enrich their own discussions. This initiative reflects a desire for broader perspectives in decision-making processes.

• The speaker confirms active communication with Víor Fernandes from the Ministry of Justice regarding digital rights, indicating potential collaboration opportunities across various councils.

Transparency and Documentation

• Emphasis is placed on ensuring transparency regarding remote deliberations conducted by the council; records will be maintained accurately as part of this effort.

• Specific proposals concerning accessibility regulations were approved unanimously during electronic voting sessions, showcasing effective decision-making processes within the council's operations.

Upcoming Meetings and Agenda Items

• The next ordinary meeting is scheduled for June 17th, where specific agenda items will include reviewing annual management reports as mandated by existing regulations set forth by ANATEL’s governing documents.

Meeting Rescheduling Discussion

Proposal for New Meeting Date

• The meeting is proposed to be rescheduled to the 17th, which falls on a Wednesday.

• Participants are advised that there is no immediate need for a response regarding their availability.

• Attendees are encouraged to check their professional and personal schedules before confirming attendance.

• If there are no objections, the intention is to proceed with the meeting on the proposed date, pending majority agreement.