¿Es posible entender la mecánica cuántica? | El Premio Nobel de Física 2022

¿Es posible entender la mecánica cuántica? | El Premio Nobel de Física 2022

Understanding Quantum Mechanics: Is It Possible?

The Nature of Understanding in Quantum Mechanics

  • The speaker questions whether it is possible to understand quantum mechanics (QM), suggesting that the answer varies based on individual interpretations of "understanding."
  • Many authors claim to have understood QM and write books about it, indicating its complexity and the subjective nature of understanding.
  • Classical mechanics (CM) is described as intuitive, while QM lacks this intuitiveness due to our inability to perceive atomic structures directly.

Intuition vs. Non-intuition in Physics

  • The speaker argues that CM can also be counterintuitive; for example, a feather and an apple dropped in a vacuum fall at the same rate despite expectations.
  • Gravity acts equally on all objects regardless of mass, illustrating that both CM and QM present challenges to intuition.

Geodesics and Space-Time Curvature

  • A geodesic is defined as the shortest path between two points; gravity curves space-time, causing objects (including light) to follow these paths.
  • Einstein's hypothesis states that acceleration and gravitational fields are locally equivalent, leading to significant equations explaining universal phenomena.

Black Holes and Their Understanding

  • Einstein's equations predict black holes' existence; however, true comprehension requires solving complex equations which many physicists struggle with.
  • Theoretical physicists propose bold hypotheses linking general relativity with quantum mechanics, suggesting our three-dimensional reality may be a hologram.

Complexity of Quantum Concepts

  • The discussion highlights how difficult concepts like wave-particle duality exist within QM—particles can exhibit properties of both waves and particles.
  • Interference patterns demonstrate how particles like photons can behave differently than classical objects, complicating our understanding further.

Spin States in Quantum Mechanics

  • An electron's spin represents its intrinsic angular momentum; measuring it reveals either an "up" or "down" state but not both simultaneously.

Understanding Quantum States and Measurement

Coherent States of Particles

  • A photon can be circularly polarized, with its electric field rotating as it moves. This coherence allows particles like electrons to exist in superpositions, pointing both up and down simultaneously according to quantum mechanics.
  • Achieving coherent states is more complex for larger systems, such as Schrödinger's cat, due to their intricate nature. The loss of coherence complicates the construction of quantum computers.

Measurement and Wave Function Collapse

  • When measuring a coherent state that has equal probabilities of being in two states (up or down), the outcome will yield one state or the other with a 50% chance. This phenomenon was historically referred to as wave function collapse.
  • Modern interpretations suggest that this measurement process can occur smoothly through interference rather than abrupt collapse, raising philosophical questions about observation in quantum mechanics.

Determinism vs. Quantum Mechanics

  • Unlike classical mechanics, which is deterministic given an initial state, quantum mechanics introduces inherent unpredictability. This leads to discussions about parallel universes arising from events like radioactive decay.
  • The concept of parallel universes suggests that every event creates bifurcations into different realities; however, these universes are orthogonal and unobservable.

Entangled States and Experiments

  • Discussing entangled objects reveals complexities beyond single-state measurements. For instance, when measuring one particle's spin direction (up or down), the other particle's state is instantly determined due to their entanglement.
  • An example involves two photons emitted from a calcium atom excited by lasers; their polarizations are correlated despite being sent vast distances apart (e.g., Andromeda).

Instantaneous Correlation and Einstein's Concerns

  • In experiments where one photon’s polarization is measured at a distance (like Andromeda), the other photon's polarization correlates instantaneously—an effect troubling for Einstein who favored local realism.

Understanding Quantum Mechanics and Local Realism

The Role of John Bell in Quantum Measurement

  • John Bell, a key figure from CERN, proposed measuring two photons to understand their polarization through linear polarizers.
  • The experiment involves using polarizers at different angles (Alpha and Alpha prime) to determine the polarization direction of each photon.
  • Bell's theorem suggests that the accumulated probability of certain measurement outcomes should be less than 2 under local realism, but quantum mechanics predicts it can exceed this limit.

Implications of Measurement Outcomes

  • If Alice measures a photon with a specific polarization and Bob does the same, their results can yield values of +1 or -1 based on alignment or orthogonality.
  • The combination of these measurements leads to total results ranging between +2 and -2, challenging classical interpretations of reality.
  • Local realism posits that measured outcomes preexist measurement; however, quantum mechanics contradicts this notion by suggesting outcomes are not predetermined.

Experimental Evidence Against Local Realism

  • Experiments conducted by Aspect and others demonstrate that results align with quantum predictions rather than local hidden variable theories.
  • Data collected shows clear exclusion of local realism as valid; thus, hidden variable theories are deemed false according to experimental evidence.

Einstein's Perspective on Quantum Mechanics

  • Einstein's skepticism about quantum mechanics is highlighted as he believed in a more intuitive understanding of reality; however, Bell’s findings challenge this view significantly.
  • The phenomenon where distant photons exhibit correlated behaviors implies they act as a single entity despite vast distances separating them.

Speculations on Universal Connectivity

  • The discussion introduces the idea that distant points in space may be connected via wormholes, theorized by Einstein and Rosen.
  • This hypothesis suggests that what appears far apart could actually be closely linked through non-local connections within the universe.

Reconciling Quantum Mechanics with General Relativity

  • There is speculation about reconciling quantum mechanics with general relativity through concepts like wormholes instead of viewing them as incompatible frameworks.
Video description

En los años 30 Einstein, Podolsky y Rosen –entre otros– trataron de dar una explicación a los postulados de la mecánica cuántica con hipótesis erróneas sobre qué magnitudes físicas son reales, como la de variables ocultas locales. Este error de Einstein es, sin embargo, uno de los más fecundos, puesto que nos permitió avanzar enormemente en la comprensión de la naturaleza. Posteriormente, el teorema de John Bell en los años 60 y los trabajos derivados de este otorgaron el Nobel de Física de 2022 a los investigadores Aspect, Clauser y Zeilinger. Hoy, la mecánica cuántica es esencial para la tecnología actual y tiene un gran futuro por delante. Todas sus predicciones se han probado correctas, pero no deja de ser antiintuitiva e inquietante… aunque también la mecánica clásica lo es, como nos explica Álvaro de Rújula. En este vídeo nos habla sobre mecánica cuántica y qué pasa cuando comprendemos, o al menos creemos haber entendido, la naturaleza. #física #divulgación #ciencia #mecanicacuantica #nobelfísica #einstein #entrelazamiento #johnbell No te pierdas ningún vídeo: solo tienes que... ¡SUSCRIBIRTE!, ¡es GRATIS!: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCk195x4zYdMx4LhqEwhcPng?sub_confirmation=1 Más vídeos como este: El Nobel de Física 2022 va a transformar el mundo https://youtu.be/ahBuPoipKj4 La realidad no es como crees | Nobel de Física 2022 https://youtu.be/Ayl3ak9lx3I ¡Síguenos en TWITTER! https://www.twitter.com/ift_uam_csic ¡INSTAGRAM! https://www.instagram.com/ift_madrid/ ¡También en FACEBOOK! https://www.facebook.com/IFTMadrid ¡Ahora estamos en TIK TOK! https://www.tiktok.com/@ift_uam_csic ¡Y consulta nuestra página web! https://www.ift.uam-csic.es Producción: Ángel Uranga y Laura Marcos CRÉDITOS Olas del mar https://www.pexels.com/es-es/video/mar-naturaleza-agua-oceano-7587126/ Bolas de billar https://www.pexels.com/es-es/video/persona-gente-barra-amigos-7279073/ Experimento de la doble rendija https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqS8Jjkk1HI Polarización circular http://users.ntua.gr/eglytsis/OptEng/Interference_p.pdf Gatos con comportamientos extraños https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TinHUHMAUQ0 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLLIwFMPmWA Ordenador cuántico https://www.wired.com/story/googles-quantum-supremacy-isnt-end-encryption/ Árbol caído https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfoUZJWKlyM Interpretación del gato de Schrödinger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation#/media/File:Schroedingers_cat_film.svg A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, (1935) 'Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?' Phys. Rev. 47, 777. https://journals.aps.org/pr/abstract/10.1103/PhysRev.47.777 Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 illustration: © Johan Jarnestad/The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences A. Einstein and N. Rosen, (1935) 'The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Relativity'. Phys. Rev. 48, 73. https://journals.aps.org/pr/pdf/10.1103/PhysRev.48.73 Escena de la película 'Interestellar' (2014) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXDHwCv5rhQ