
BetterHelp: it's MUCH worse than you think. Let's talk about sponsors.
SponsorBlock: https://sponsor.ajay.app | BitWarden: http://bitwarden.com OUTRO: "Liar, Liar" by Millimeters of Mercury SUBMISSIONS: http://mackattack.millimetersofmercury.com/submit TO SEE MY DISLIKE COUNTS: http://mackattack.millimetersofmercury.com/dislike PATREON: http://patreon.com/yt_mackattack INSTAGRAM: @mackkozelka THREADS: @mackkozelka TIKTOK: @mackkozelka MUSIC: http://millimetersofmercury.com & Millimeters of Mercury on Apple Music/Pandora/Spotify/Tidal EMAIL: mack@mackattack.net
BetterHelp: it's MUCH worse than you think. Let's talk about sponsors.
Welcome and Sponsorship Segments
In this section, MAC discusses the absence of sponsor segments in their videos and provides reasons for this choice.
Reasons for Avoiding Sponsorship Segments
- Sponsor segments are perceived as irritating and disruptive to the viewing experience.
- Concerns raised about the integration of advertisements within content without clear demarcation.
- Not relying on YouTube for full-time income reduces pressure to accept sponsorships.
- Psychological impact of accepting sponsored content leading to a loss of control over messaging.
- Highlighting the potential exaggeration or misinformation in sponsored content, particularly regarding VPN services.
Misconceptions About VPN Services
MAC delves into common misconceptions surrounding VPN services and their actual benefits.
Misconceptions Regarding VPN Services
- Sponsored content may contain exaggerated or false claims due to approval by marketing departments.
- Explanation on limited scenarios where VPN enhances security, such as using public Wi-Fi networks.
- Limitations of VPN in protecting against hacking or preserving privacy effectively.
Online Security Recommendations
Recommendations provided by MAC for enhancing online security beyond using VPN services.
Online Security Best Practices
- Encouragement to enable two-factor authentication with physical security keys or authentication apps.
- Advocacy for utilizing password managers like Bitwarden for secure password management across devices.
Privacy Considerations and Final Thoughts
MAC concludes with insights on privacy considerations and the limited utility of VPN services.
Privacy Concerns and Final Remarks
- Emphasis on circumventing geographic content restrictions as a primary use case for VPN services.
Recipe Challenges and Sustainability Concerns
The speaker discusses the challenges of following a specific recipe from HelloFresh due to the complexity of sourcing ingredients and the sustainability issues related to packaging and recycling.
Recipe Complexity
- Finding all the required ingredients for a HelloFresh recipe is challenging, including items like garlic, lemon, pasta, cream sauce base, zucchini, parsley, Parmesan cheese, and chicken breast.
Sustainability Issues
- Critiques the excessive packaging used by HelloFresh for individual ingredient portions that contribute to environmental concerns.
- Discusses the inefficiency of plastic recycling compared to aluminum recycling.
- Highlights the economic and environmental costs associated with shipping pre-portioned ingredients.
- Mentions the guilt associated with using single-use plastics despite claims of recyclability.
- Points out the high cost of HelloFresh meals in relation to grocery budgeting and environmental impact.
Ethical Considerations in Sponsorship Deals
The speaker reflects on ethical dilemmas related to potential sponsorship deals with companies like Surfshark or HelloFresh due to conflicting values and concerns about research transparency.
Ethical Dilemma
- Expresses discomfort with accepting sponsorships from companies like Surfshark or HelloFresh due to conflicting values regarding sustainability practices and labor conditions.
- Mentions challenges in reconciling financial incentives with personal ethics.
- Raises concerns about avoiding thorough research or omitting critical information for sponsorship purposes.
BetterHelp: A Critical Examination
The speaker provides a critical analysis of BetterHelp's business model, highlighting concerns about accountability, service quality, and industry practices.
BetterHelp Critique
- Criticizes BetterHelp's business model for connecting users with therapists while taking a significant cut without assuming responsibility for outcomes or working conditions.
- Questions the qualifications of service providers on BetterHelp platform.
- Comments on the lack of accountability in tech-driven healthcare services like BetterHelp.
Therapy Comparison: Traditional vs. BetterHelp
The speaker compares traditional therapy with online therapy provided by BetterHelp, highlighting the differences in approach and features.
Traditional Therapy Challenges
- In traditional therapy, challenges like technical support, background noise, microphone issues, and network problems can disrupt sessions.
- Communication limitations exist in traditional therapy where one must wait to discuss issues during scheduled appointments.
BetterHelp Features
- BetterHelp offers chat, phone, and video sessions for convenience but may not suit everyone's preferences.
- Digital worksheets are available on BetterHelp as opposed to paper worksheets in traditional therapy.
Provider Matching and Switching
- Smart provider matching is a feature of BetterHelp that enhances therapist selection.
- Easy switching of providers on BetterHelp may impact the effectiveness of therapy due to frequent changes.
Cost and Accessibility Comparison: Traditional vs. BetterHelp
This section delves into the cost structures and accessibility aspects of traditional therapy versus online therapy through BetterHelp.
Cost Discrepancy
- While traditional therapy costs around $150-$180 per session, BetterHelp ranges from $65 to $90 weekly or $260 to $360 monthly.
Insurance Coverage
- Traditional therapy often accepts insurance coverage with copays; however, BetterHelp does not accept any form of insurance.
Ethical Concerns and Business Growth
The discussion shifts towards ethical considerations regarding mental health services like those offered by BetterHelp alongside its rapid business growth.
Therapist Compensation
- Questions arise about therapist compensation on platforms like BetterHelp compared to private practices or group settings.
Business Expansion
New Section
In this section, the speaker discusses a complaint issued by the Federal Trade Commission against BetterHelp for privacy violations.
Complaint Issued by FTC
- The FTC issued a complaint against BetterHelp for serious privacy violations.
- BetterHelp operates multiple sites catering to different user groups like Christian and LGBT users.
- Users pay $60 to $90 weekly for counseling and must fill out detailed questionnaires before signing up.
- Over 25,000 licensed therapists provide mental health therapy through video conferencing and other means on BetterHelp.
New Section
This section discusses the breach of privacy by the respondent in sharing visitors' and users' health information despite promises of confidentiality.
Breach of Privacy
- The respondent initially assured visitors that their health information would remain private between them and their counselor. However, in October 2021, these assurances were removed after the respondent shared intake questionnaire responses with Facebook for advertising purposes.
- Despite promising strict privacy regarding email addresses and intake questionnaires to induce sign-ups, the respondent disclosed this information to Facebook for advertising and its own purposes.
- Additional privacy assurances were given from August 2017 to December 2020, stating that email addresses would be kept strictly private. However, thousands still provided their email addresses.
- Respondent understood the importance of keeping mental health treatment private but disclosed email addresses to third parties for advertising purposes.
- Visitors were pushed into providing health information before reading any privacy disclosures while being repeatedly presented with privacy assurances in small, barely visible writing at the bottom of pages.
New Section
This section discusses how respondent uploaded email addresses to Facebook for retargeting and targeting new users with advertisements.
Uploading Email Addresses to Facebook
- Respondent matched over 4 million visitors and users with their Facebook user IDs from January 2017 to October 2018.
- Uploaded over 170,000 email addresses to Facebook for retargeting visitors and users.
- Uploaded over 15,000 email addresses in January 2018 through October 2018 to target potential new users.
- In October 2017, uploaded email addresses of current and former users (over 2 million people) to target them with advertisements or refer friends.
New Section
This part explains how respondent shared visitors' email addresses, IP addresses, and event records with Facebook for tracking actions on the sites.
Sharing Information with Facebook
- Shared visitors' email addresses, IP addresses, and event records known as events with Facebook.
- Events automatically tracked actions like answering questions or enrolling in the service.
- Recorded and disclosed events through web beacons placed on multi-sites.
New Section
The discussion focuses on disclosing user information to optimize advertisements on Facebook.
Disclosing User Information
- Disclosed that over 70,000 visitors signed up but did not become paying users in January 2018.
- Shared previous therapy data of over 1.5 million users gathered through intake questionnaires from November 2018 to March 2020.
New Section
This segment highlights sharing visitor information with third parties for advertising purposes.
Sharing Visitor Data
- Shared financial status of over 3.5 million visitors from October 2018 to November 2020.
- Revealed that over 180,000 visitors became paying users in January through December of 2020 via an event denoting credit card entry after questionnaire completion.
New Section
Discusses revealing visitor's prior therapy history and sharing data with third parties like Snapchat.
Revealing Prior Therapy History
- Analyst revealed true meanings of events coded by inexperienced marketing analyst to Facebook in July of 2018.
- Disclosed prior therapy history of millions of visitors/users by decoding questionnaire responses shared with other third parties in January of
Information Sharing Practices and Consequences
The transcript discusses how BetterHelp falsely claimed not to share protected health information with third parties, leading to significant consequences.
False Information Sharing
- BetterHelp provided false information about sharing protected health information with external entities.
- Senior employees consistently denied sharing health information with third parties from September 2013 to December 2020.
Misrepresentation of HIPAA Compliance
This section delves into BetterHelp's misrepresentation of HIPAA compliance through the display of misleading seals on their platforms.
Misleading Representation
- BetterHelp displayed misleading HIPAA seals on its websites, implying compliance with HIPAA regulations.
- Consumers were led to believe that a government agency or third party had reviewed and approved BetterHelp's privacy practices.
HIPAA Certification Misinformation
The discussion focuses on the misinformation regarding HIPAA certification and the lack of actual compliance.
False Claims
- BetterHelp misrepresented being HIPAA certified, assuring customers they could view the certification on web pages.
- No government agency or third party verified BetterHelp's practices for HIPAA compliance.
Consequences and Penalties
This part outlines the repercussions faced by BetterHelp due to their deceptive practices.
Regulatory Actions
- Following an investigation, BetterHelp was fined $7.8 million by the commission for deceptive practices.
- They were prohibited from using certain information for advertising and required to comply with specific regulations.