4 Principle of Optimality - Dynamic Programming introduction
Introduction to Dynamic Programming
Overview of Dynamic Programming
- The video introduces dynamic programming, explaining its purpose and significance in solving optimization problems.
- It highlights the differences between dynamic programming and greedy methods, emphasizing that both aim for optimization but employ different strategies.
Greedy Method vs. Dynamic Programming
- The greedy method follows a predefined procedure to achieve optimal results, such as Kruskal's algorithm for minimum cost spanning trees or Dijkstra's algorithm for shortest paths.
- In contrast, dynamic programming explores all possible solutions to identify the best one, which can be more time-consuming than the greedy approach.
Principle of Optimality
- Dynamic programming is based on the principle of optimality, which states that an optimal solution can be reached through a sequence of decisions made at each stage.
- Unlike the greedy method where decisions are made once, dynamic programming involves making decisions at multiple stages throughout problem-solving.
Tabulation vs. Memoization
Fibonacci Example
- The speaker presents a recursive definition of the Fibonacci function as an example to illustrate tabulation and memoization methods.
- The Fibonacci series starts with 0 and 1; each subsequent term is derived from adding the two preceding terms.
Tracing Recursive Calls
- When calculating Fibonacci(5), multiple recursive calls are traced, demonstrating how many times functions call themselves (totaling 15 calls).
- This tracing reveals inefficiencies in computing values repeatedly due to overlapping subproblems inherent in recursion.
Time Complexity Analysis
Recurrence Relation
- A recurrence relation is established for the Fibonacci function: T(n) = 2T(n - 1), leading to a time complexity of O(2^n).
- This exponential time complexity indicates significant inefficiency when using naive recursion for larger inputs.
Optimization Potential
Memoization and Dynamic Programming in Fibonacci Calculation
Introduction to Memoization
- The speaker introduces the concept of reducing function calls in the Fibonacci function by storing results, thus avoiding redundant calculations.
- A global array is initialized with -1 values to indicate that no Fibonacci results are known initially.
Function Call Process
- The first call made is
fib(5); subsequent calls are made recursively until base cases are reached.
- When calculating
fib(0), it returns 0 as it's a base case. This value is then used to compute higher Fibonacci numbers.
- As results for lower Fibonacci numbers are computed, they are stored, preventing further calls for already known values.
Efficiency of Memoization
- By using memoization, the number of function calls is significantly reduced from exponential (2^n) to linear (O(n)).
- The total number of calls made during this process is counted, demonstrating how memoization optimizes performance.
Understanding Top-down Approach
- Memoization exemplifies a top-down approach where larger problems break down into smaller subproblems that build upon previously solved ones.
- Conditional calls based on stored results illustrate how unnecessary computations can be avoided through effective storage strategies.
Transitioning to Tabulation Method
- The speaker transitions to discussing an iterative method called tabulation for solving the same problem without recursion.
Iterative Function Explanation
- An iterative function starts filling an array from base cases (
f(0)=0andf(1)=1) and builds up towards the desired term using loops.
- For each term calculated, previous two terms are added together iteratively until reaching
fib(5).
Bottom-up Approach in Dynamic Programming
- This bottom-up approach contrasts with memoization's top-down strategy by starting from the smallest values and building up.
- The algorithm fills a table progressively, showcasing how dynamic programming often favors iterative solutions over recursive ones.
Conclusion on Dynamic Programming Strategies
- Both memoization and tabulation methods can solve problems effectively; however, tabulation is more commonly used due to its efficiency in dynamic programming contexts.